User talk:Tfytfy1

Your submission at Articles for creation: QuEST Forum (October 29)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rankersbo (talk) 09:20, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Suggestion
Hello, I am an experienced editor of computer networking and telecommunications articles and might give some advice. Instead of trying to create a new article on the Quest Forum without independent sources, it might be a better idea to work on the related article that already exists: TL 9000. That one also has no independent sources, so would be subject to deletion if anyone notices. A combined article on both the group and its document would be a little easier to justify. That is typically what we try to do, until the article gets too long like Wi-Fi and the Wi-Fi Alliance or Ethernet Alliance and Ethernet for example and it is split. Each article needs independent sources to show it is "notable" in the Wikipedia sense. Generally this means someone who is not in the group nor trying to promote its document has published something about it. If a trade press has written an article about it, that should be cited to verify the information in the article. these might be a start? If you like, we can move the existing TL 9000 article to be called QuEST Forum, but that can be done at any time. Thanks for your efforts and patience is appreciated. W Nowicki (talk) 17:52, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: QuEST Forum (November 20)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:05, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/QuEST Forum


Hello Tfytfy1. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "QuEST Forum".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 08:55, 23 June 2014 (UTC)