User talk:Tgemelli

The article Massage mavens has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. See also WP:SPAM and Wikipedia is not the Yellow Pages. NawlinWiki 16:10, 30 July 2007 (UTC)


 * It's a year-old company whose only mentions have been readers-poll wins for "Best Massage". That doesn't meet WP:CORP.  Nevertheless, per your request, I've copied the deleted text to your userspace at User:Tgemelli/Massage mavens. NawlinWiki 16:33, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, given that the article lists you as one of the two "key people" in the company, you should look at Conflict of interest. NawlinWiki 16:34, 30 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Vineyard Vines, among other things, states that "Vineyard Vines was ranked 217th in Inc. magazine's list of the 500 fastest-growing private companies in 2006." This is the kind of independent recognition of notability you would need.  Again, please read WP:CORP and WP:V.  That will answer a lot of the questions you are asking me. NawlinWiki 16:43, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:MassageMavens.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:MassageMavens.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:24, 31 July 2007 (UTC)