User talk:Tgeorgescu/Archives/2019/November

Pilose399
. I admire patient people like you. I couldn't do it. Bishonen &#124; talk 17:03, 1 November 2019 (UTC).


 * Thanks. Tgeorgescu (talk) 18:05, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

edit war
You are in danger of breaching 3RR.Slatersteven (talk) 10:25, 6 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Yup, 3RR is more than three reverts. Consecutive edits (uninterrupted by another editor) count as only one revert. Even Twinkle knows that. Tgeorgescu (talk) 10:57, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

The quotes
Hi Tgeorgescu, I think we're in agreement about all the essential points about the Exodus, however, I'm not sure that the posting of long quotes of previous discussions is helpful. I would suggest just summarizing your view now rather than quoting previous exchanges. I realize this is sort of an endless task and gets tedious, but I think it would benefit everyone and maybe lead to less outrageous reactions from Jgriffy.--Ermenrich (talk) 14:02, 7 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Ok, I'll collapse two of the quotes. Besides there was a joke about a scorpion and a tortoise, I don't think that he could change his ways. Tgeorgescu (talk) 14:07, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Up yourself
Hi Tgeorgescu, I think you are up yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.32.163.173 (talk) 22:27, 8 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Nope, I am not even an admin. I could have been, but never bothered to apply for it. Anyway, this isn't an anything goes forum for crank science, it is an encyclopedia. All I say to some people is that they lack support from WP:MAINSTREAM WP:SCHOLARSHIP. It does not mean that I hate them. I don't hate people, but I hate breaking WP:RULES. We're simply doing a job, and some people are inapt to do it, maybe because of lacking education or because they are highly biased (WP:NOBIGOTS). This is explained as:




 * Quoted by Tgeorgescu. Otherwise this is a place for people who are proud that they are intelligent and educated. You see, magnanimity (megalopsychia) is a virtue, not a vice. This isn't a place for people who are ashamed they have a library, or are ashamed of mainstream science, or are ashamed of mainstream Bible scholarship. We have a solution for people who bash Cambridge, Harvard, Oxford, Princeton, Sorbonne, and Yale: we show them the door. We do not like them and they do not like us. We do not need their support, since bigotry and Wikipedia are incompatible. This is hardly a secret, we want everyone to know it. I'm not being mean but telling it as it is. Don't like what Harvard teaches about the Bible? Keep that to yourself, do not bother us with your POV. I'm not saying that you have to like Harvard. It is just that not liking it is not appreciated around here. The Wikipedia community cannot afford to bash scholars of the highest reputation. That is simply not done upon this website. WP:CHOPSY rule the pages of this encyclopedia. That's part of who we are, part of what Wikipedia is. We make no apologies for it. People who say that Harvard teaches junk simply don't belong among us. As a serious encyclopedia we have no other choice. We really have no other choice than assuming that WP:CHOPSY are the light on the path. Their handbooks are not a secret, their publications are not a secret, so we may know what they teach there. If you don't want that their knowledge becomes available to the masses, you don't belong among us. Our purpose has never been preventing the public from knowing their teachings. We do not seek to pamper the true believers. We render hard-core Bible scholarship and make no excuses for it. Its light will be spread, unless you succeed in disbanding Ivy Plus and all US state universities (to not even mention Europe, Canada and Australia). All I stated here is a matter of encyclopedic knowledge (academic learning), not of a superiority complex. An encyclopedia dedicated to academic learning renders top academic learning. This seems pretty straightforward and uncontroversial to me. Bigots would have none of that, that's why this encyclopedia is not meant for them. Bigots would like a Wikipedia without Big Bang, without evolution, without mainstream Bible scholarship and obviously endorsing their own pet theology. If the above seems to be inferred from insufficient information: I regularly get attacked by quacks, New Age woo peddlers, protochronists, extremists, nofappers and bigots. So I guess this time because of bigots, since that essay I have recently created and promoted to top Google searches. I have read "Appendix D" from Ken Ham's Already Compromised. Well, we don't consider his POV encyclopedic knowledge, since we're not Conservapedia or New World Encyclopedia. "Appendix D" only shows how absurd and ridiculous the claims of creationists are, for a scientifically educated person. We side with scientifically educated persons, not with Ken Ham. That guy would preach all day long that astronomy, nuclear physics and biology are Antichristical sciences. We have a low tolerance for such craps. If reputable scholars have written that the theology of some Pauline epistles contradicts the theology of other Pauline epistles, it is not our task to WP:CENSOR that information. Tgeorgescu (talk) 16:13, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Masturbation and the rabbis
For reasons that totally baffle me you seem to take an interest in this topic. Read, and be enlightened. Achar Sva (talk) 04:50, 28 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Ok, thanks. Tgeorgescu (talk) 11:49, 28 November 2019 (UTC)