User talk:Tgeorgescu/Archives/2023/January

January 2023
Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Romania for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you.  // Timothy :: talk  22:55, 10 January 2023 (UTC)


 * WP:DNTR. tgeorgescu (talk) 23:04, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you.  // Timothy :: talk  23:29, 10 January 2023 (UTC)


 * WP:DNTR, again. tgeorgescu (talk) 23:29, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Don't use talk pages as a forum for general discussion and POV monologues  // Timothy :: talk  23:31, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

You are part of the conspiracy
It is clear that you are working for illuminati USA. 2A00:23C7:5882:8201:95C7:89D4:717:5483 (talk) 16:50, 17 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Why USA? tgeorgescu (talk) 16:52, 17 January 2023 (UTC)


 * I wonder what makes it "clear"? Joshua Jonathan  - Let's talk!  19:57, 17 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Sorry, if I were to say what I think, I would be blamed for violating WP:NPA. tgeorgescu (talk) 21:34, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

I do not know how to respond to your straw man arguments
I don't know how to literally respond within the chat stream you state them.

Also, I don't know why you keep using weird straw men. So far you have ignored every word I said and argued very strange irrelevant issues.

One was this: "As stated above "fundamentalism" does not necessarily entail "violent"." I have no idea where you were coming from, here.

Nor this: "And the label of "fundamentalism" is sourced to non-fundamentalist Rabbis and other Jewish scholars." Which is accurate, it's a pejorative term sourced by nonobservant Jews, and I would never argue that. But it's also irrelevant to anything I said.

Nor this: "About sexual abuse: any closed religious community suffers from similar problems" This has nothing to do with what I said. No one has asserted that this horrifying and terrible thing doesn't exist in the Charedi world, as it does in every society to keep criminal records on such things throughout history. I don't know why you keep using weird straw men.

Nor this: "so Wikipedia does not single out the Haredi" Never said they did.

Seriously, you guys have ignored 100% of everything I said, and automatically undo every edit that's both factually accurate and reflects the articles posted.

Meanwhile, you guys maintain lies unsupported by the very sources cited for them, and you personally use idiotic straw men.

This is deeply disturbing. 46.19.85.230 (talk) 09:06, 26 January 2023 (UTC)


 * I don't know. Friendly advice: listen to WP:NOTTHEM (i.e. write friendly) and you'll have more chance of being listened to. tgeorgescu (talk) 21:44, 26 January 2023 (UTC)