User talk:Tgi417

License tagging for Image:Mk1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mk1.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 09:06, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Mk00020.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mk00020.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 10:09, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Mk00030.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mk00030.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:11, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Please stop creating inappropriate pages: Paddy the dog
Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages such as Paddy the dog. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. ---Casper2k3 14:23, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Please stop removing Speedy Deletion tags from articles you have created yourself: Paddy the dog
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles as it is considered vandalism. You may place hangon on the page and make your case on the article's talk page if you oppose an article's speedy deletion. Thanks. ---Casper2k3 14:36, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Uploading images and editing articles
Hi, Most of the images you have uploaded have dubious tags. You can't claim that you created them yourself even if you took the screenshot. They will probably have to be deleted unless they can be shown to fall under fair use. I'd suggest that you stop uploading images for the moment.

Also, the Con Murphy you refer to (broadcaster) is not the same person as the one originally in the article (President of the GAA). You can't just add info about two different people to the same article. Con Murphy from RTÉ would need his own article, but I'm not sure that he's notable enough.

Finally, instead of blanking Crimeline Ireland you should have used the "Move" tab to rename it to Crimecall. Now the first one will have to be deleted.

There's loads of info in WP:Help about all this. Ian Cheese 19:35, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Des c0101.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:Des c0101.jpg, has been listed at Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ian Cheese 21:52, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Crimeline.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:Crimeline.jpg, has been listed at Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ian Cheese 21:54, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Big dolores.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:Big dolores.jpg, has been listed at Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ian Cheese 22:04, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Jw 111.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:Jw 111.jpg, has been listed at Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ian Cheese 22:13, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Proposed deletions
I've added the "prod" template to the article Martina Stanley, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Martina Stanley. If you remove the dated prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ian Cheese 22:18, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

I've added the "prod" template to the article Mary Kennedy's Paper Tigers, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Mary Kennedy's Paper Tigers. If you remove the dated prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ian Cheese 22:18, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree images
Several images you uploaded have been listed at Possibly_unfree_images because their copyright status is disputed. If the images' copyright status cannot be verified, they may be deleted. --Fritz S. (Talk) 09:50, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Kat kw 001011.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:Kat kw 001011.jpg, has been listed at because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Tabercil 12:03, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Marilyn Babcock
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Marilyn Babcock, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Marilyn Babcock seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Marilyn Babcock, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 16:01, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Lynda leigh
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lynda leigh, because another editor is suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add db-author to the top of the page. ARended Winter 10:50, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Lynda Leigh
I have nominated Lynda Leigh, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Lynda Leigh. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Vinh1313 (talk) 21:05, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Kat_kw_001011.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Kat_kw_001011.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 23:16, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Mart00010.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mart00010.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:43, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Mk 0013.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mk 0013.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 05:55, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Keth417.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Keth417.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. [midnight comet]  [talk]  01:07, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Keith wynne
A tag has been placed on Keith wynne requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dismas |(talk) 10:06, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Playmate Model Mom
An article that you have been involved in editing, Playmate Model Mom, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Dismas |(talk) 19:28, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Keith Wynne


The article Keith Wynne has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A non-notable director of a non-notable film.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joe Chill (talk) 04:29, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

August 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Keith Wynne has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Fieldday-sunday (talk) 00:40, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Keith Wynne. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Fieldday-sunday (talk) 00:46, 16 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Please be aware that simply changing the text of a page to something like "deleted by non-notable" does not delete the article. Dismas |(talk) 01:23, 16 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Do you really want to get rid of Keith Wynne? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:53, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Tgi417! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:15, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Brenda Power -