User talk:Tgillombardo

Proposed deletion of Abdul khaliq Ahmed Al-Baidhani
Hello, Tgillombardo. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Abdul khaliq Ahmed Al-Baidhani, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Abdul khaliq Ahmed Al-Baidhani to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Sourov0000 (talk) 23:13, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Abdul al-Rahman al-Ziahri


The article Abdul al-Rahman al-Ziahri has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Fiddle  Faddle  17:21, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Abdul khaliq Ahmed Al-Baidhani


The article Abdul khaliq Ahmed Al-Baidhani has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Fiddle  Faddle  17:30, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Greetings!
Greetings!

Welcome to the wikipedia! I see you have an interest in the Guantanamo captives -- an interest I share.

I'd like to help make sure the efforts you make on articles in this area are a effective as possible. So, I'd like to help make sure you don't duplicate work that has already been done. And I would like to make sure you don't make it more likely that efforts I have made get challenged.

At one time approximately 500 or more of the 779 Guantanamo captives had individual articles. But the wikipedia's criteria are more stringent now. Some of those articles meet the current more stringent standards. A significant fraction of those articles would have needed a lot of work to be brought up to the more stringest standards. And another significant fraction couldn't be brought up to the current more stringent standards, even with great effort, because there just weren't enough good references to meet those standards.

Recently you took four article titles that redirected to Saudi detainees at Guantanamo Bay or Yemeni detainees at Guantanamo Bay, and turned them into articles again.

No offense, but the new articles you started don't measure up to wikipedia's standards. That is why I changed the two which hadn't been nominated for deletion back to redirects.

If you are still interested in working on articles on these topics please let me help you do so in a way that will be accepted by all the other wikipedia contributors.

Can I just verify whether you personally drafted the new material you added? If some of that material was a WP:CLOSEPARAPHRASE, or an unattributed quote, that would probably eventually be found out, and lead to a large reversion.

Please see my comments at User talk:Kendrick7.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 19:29, 11 August 2013 (UTC)