User talk:Tgreve

Speedy deletion of SSAI Board
A tag has been placed on SSAI Board requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 21:19, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Falmouth Theatre Guild
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Falmouth Theatre Guild, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Falmouth Theatre Guild. ... disco spinster   talk  21:26, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Your request that User:Discospinster should be blocked
I've participated in the discussion that you have initiated at AN/I, and await your contributions to answer the concerns raised there.AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 23:40, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Seacoast Shores Association
A tag has been placed on Seacoast Shores Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Neil N   talk  ♦  contribs  03:35, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: Seacoast Shores Association
The reason I deleted this article was that it did not show any evidence of notability by Wikipedia's criteria. If you want to recreate the article, be sure that there is something in it that indicates it has at least "been the subject of coverage in secondary sources" (from the Wikipedia guidelines for notability of organizations). ... disco spinster   talk  20:01, 5 April 2008 (UTC)