User talk:Thanto19

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Thanto19, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Timeline of the South China Sea dispute has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 23:09, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Fiery Cross Reef— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   03:39, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spratly Islands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flat Island. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Treaty of Tientsin (1885) into Timeline of the South China Sea dispute. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:33, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Nine-dash line. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Plagiarism, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:17, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

A reminder
Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. STSC (talk) 18:36, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Nine-Dash Line
1) Re: This edit I'm sorry, but it can't be BOTH "undefined" and vaguely "defined" at the same time. (i.e. I do not understand what you are attempting to communicate.) I agree that it can be BOTH "undefined" and "vaguely located". (But as I said, I do not understand what you are attempting to communicate.) Help me please. Pdfpdf (talk) 10:11, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

2) Re: This edit What's the point? It seems to be trivial nit-picking, and not worthy of addition. If there is some significant issue, please tell us all what it is. Pdfpdf (talk) 10:11, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

it's vaguely because China does not tell where are these dashes exactly. It's undefined because we do not know what these dashes are.Thanto19 (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

South China Sea
Thanks for your useful edits. Pdfpdf (talk) 10:26, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * (I continue to wait for your response to my previous post on this page. Pdfpdf (talk) 10:26, 12 October 2017 (UTC))