User talk:Thaonguyen050300/Evaluate an Article

Hi, nice job on your article evaluation. You did a thorough job briefly addressing all the major aspects of the article. I have to warn you against choosing this article for your project however, since it is already pretty well developed and has a wp:c-class evaluation. This means that it might be difficult to find new information to incorporate into the article. I'm less concerned about that with this article than some because the topic is rather broad and I believe there will be a great deal of published information about it that you can draw on to improve the article.

I think you have a lot of great ideas in your article evaluation about how to improve the article. Discussion of how technological and social changes shaped the practice of graphic design seems cool! I also like the idea of reorganizing the "applications" section or giving it a new sub-head. I also think images could be important given the topic of the article. Let me know if you want to work on adding an image and I'll help you navigate the policies around that.

That said, I think that it's pretty typical to find that it's more difficult to improve an article that's already more developed and so you might prefer to change your topic. I think at this point I would advise against that, but it's still an option if you want to take it.

I'm excited to see how this project develops!

Groceryheist (talk) 02:17, 25 January 2021 (UTC)