User talk:Thapadushy

Notability of Democratic Empowerement Party
seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. --Android Mouse Bot 2 17:49, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

May 2007
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Vision of Votesizing, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wombatcat 17:52, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Democratic Empowerment Party
seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. --Android Mouse Bot 2 17:54, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Votesizing improvements

 * Well in order to beef up the article to save it from deletion sources will need to be added. These citations are needed to verify the information and to prove notability, and should be independent from your organization and be from reliable sources with a reputation for fact checking. So far the only information I could find about votesizing is from the democratic empowerment party, which would not qualify it as independent. Please see Article development for guidelines on how to write a great article. Thanks for contributing to the encyclopedia. &mdash; O cat ecir  Talk  02:28, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

As you see that the article on votesizing has been shifted to Dushyant/Vote sizing as per the Wikipedia's regulations for articles udner construction. I shall be soon adding the relevant referances. till then you can also visit www.votesizing.org. Thank you for your contribution and interest in the project.--Thapadushy 05:30, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Note
I have moved your content into the userspace by placing your content here. Sr13 04:03, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Dushyant/Votesizing
fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: Redirect to deleted page --Android Mouse Bot 2 04:29, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote-sizing?
Hi, I don't think I've seen any reputable media coverage of "vote-sizing" as described in your recent edits to the Voting System page. Could you cite/source this section so that we know this is a phenomenon adequate for inclusion in Wikipedia? best, -- Joebeone (Talk) 21:26, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi Joebeone, it is hard to precisely define a "reputable media coverage". In short the concept of vote sizing is to politicaly empower the bottom layer in the social strate which in turn should help them bridge the gap in social and economic strata. The belief is that if the poor are politically effective and have a stronger political voice then it will automatically lead them to be economically, and socially powerful.--Thapadushy 16:36, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Vote Sizing
A "" template has been added to the article Vote Sizing, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Dhartung | Talk 06:57, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Gangtok at Night.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Gangtok at Night.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. RobertG ♬ talk 08:36, 23 June 2009 (UTC)