User talk:Tharakan

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

-- Pamri &bull; Talk 16:22, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Kariappa...
[Field Marshal K.M. Cariappa isnt this a copyright issue. --[[User:Aravind parvatikar|Aravind Parvatikar]] 10:27, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

I wasn't sure where to write about 'permissions' (so I had written it as a footnote along with Cariappa's Image). I asked Seetal (Admin of bharat-rakshak.com) specifically for permission which was granted willingly. So unless I get a reversal on that, this shouldn't be an issue. --Robins 08:16, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Bitmap indexes in PG
Postgres does not support bitmap indexes in any released version, contrary to your edit. Bitmap index scans (supported since 8.1) and on-disk bitmap indexes have very little in common. Neilc 06:34, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Wealth Insight
A tag has been placed on Wealth Insight, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - Tiswas (t) 17:28, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Kodandera Madappa Cariappa.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Kodandera Madappa Cariappa.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Kodandera Madappa Cariappa.jpg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: copyvio http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/LAND-FORCES/Army/Army-Chiefs/Chiefs-Army03.html To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Kodandera Madappa Cariappa.jpg, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Kodandera Madappa Cariappa.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Spam in Mutual Fund Insight
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Mutual Fund Insight, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Mutual Fund Insight is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Mutual Fund Insight, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 18:31, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:ValueResearchOnline.png
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:ValueResearchOnline.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  03:46, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

File:India Gate at night.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:India Gate at night.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:13, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Kutumb for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kutumb is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kutumb until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Regards,  KC Velaga  ✉  12:56, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Value Research for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Value Research is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Value Research until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Regards,  KC Velaga  ✉  12:57, 12 August 2016 (UTC)