User talk:Tharel19

Your submission at Articles for creation: OzVision (May 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Daniel kenneth was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:OzVision and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:OzVision Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Daniel_kenneth&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:OzVision reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Daniel kenneth (talk) 15:37, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:OzVision


A tag has been placed on Draft:OzVision, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- Gestrid (talk) 15:57, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Thank you! Does this mean I can try to fix the article I submitted? --Tharel19 (talk) 11:47, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Block evasion
You have been blocked indefinitely as you are clearly the same person as. Once that user's block is resolved, you'll be free to pick whether to use Tharel or Tharel19 for editing, going forward. --Yamla (talk) 13:14, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi,

I did not evade the block - one of the editors changed my account. Please see OzVision talk (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Tharel). You'll see @PhilKnight renamed my account and that I've just asked him what is the meaning and how I should proceed.

And could someone tell me how I am to resolve the blocking? I've asked in the talk section but no one answered me. TXS --Tharel19 (talk) 13:25, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

This appears incorrect. There's still but also,. Two separate users. I'm aware that the user account, Tharel, was renamed. As to how to get the original account unblocked, I believe nobody has considered your request yet because it's not sufficiently convincing. I'll write more on that talk page. --Yamla (talk) 13:28, 13 October 2016 (UTC)