User talk:Tharg1000

Speedy deletion nomination of The 100 greatest metal guitarists


A tag has been placed on The 100 greatest metal guitarists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. [ dotKuro ] [ talk ] [ contribs ] 12:16, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of The 100 Greatest Metal Guitarists for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The 100 Greatest Metal Guitarists is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The 100 Greatest Metal Guitarists until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 14:26, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

August 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Owen&times; &#9742;  21:17, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

This comment is unwarranted. Someone must have used this IP address for vandalism. It certainly wasn't me. Tharg1000 (talk) 11:35, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Joe Caserta


The article Joe Caserta has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "BLP does not meet WP:NBIO- notability is inherited from his company."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:50, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi, Caserta's book, co-written with Ralph Kimball, was crucial to ETL processes at the time of its publication, rendering him notable.Tharg1000 (talk) 07:03, 7 December 2021 (UTC)