User talk:ThatIPEditor/Archive 1

ThatIPEditor, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Welcome!

Hello, ThatIPEditor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I greatly appreciate your efforts to fight vandalism on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

If you find yourself cleaning up vandalism frequently, you might be interested in patrolling recent changes.

For the WikiProject on vandalism cleanup, see the Counter-Vandalism Unit.

To make vandalism reverts easier you can ask for the rollback feature to be enabled for your registered Wikipedia account.

Below are more pages related to vandalism:
 * Cleaning up vandalism
 * Anti-vandalism tool
 * Administrator intervention against vandalism

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on this page. Again, welcome!

S0091 (talk) 16:04, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Post order
Re your post at WP:COIN,lease see Talk page guidelines, and perhaps this on threading We generally try not to disturb the chronological flow of a thread by adding to a post that has already been replied to. The easy way to keep things clear is to add to the end of the thread, without going back to edit or expand earlier posts. Possibly (talk) 04:44, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that, ok, I will read through the talk page guidelines, thank you!

"Notification"
Is this a joke? That was already closed for being obviously retaliatory harassment. IHateAccounts (talk) 15:11, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * It might be, but either way, it seems like the person who reported you forgot to place the template. I just did it for them. That's all ThatIPEditor (talk) 20:44, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * One more thing, I posted the notice before it got closed, and also give you a heads-up ThatIPEditor (talk) 20:48, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Courtesy notice of undeletion request
A request for the undeletion of User:ThatIPEditor/redwarnConfig.js can be viewed at Interface administrators' noticeboard ✨ Ed  talk!  ✨ 21:38, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

G11 declined
Hello ThatIPEditor -- I'm confused as to why you tagged Draft:Cheriyam Hills as WP:G11 (promotional), as it did not seem to fit the criteria at all. I'm not seeing any other speedy criterion that applies in draftspace, either. Please reread the description before requesting deletion again. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 07:50, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Ah yes. That must have been an accident. I usually tag them in batches, where I open all of the pages that is G11, then, I would tag them all together. I must have opened it accidentally. I can assure you that would not happen again. Thank you! ThatIPEditor (talk) 18:52, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm guessing Draft:Jacinto Subías (now moved to correct title) was the same problem? Please do be careful with batching; it must be very disconcerting and off-putting for an inexperienced editor to be working on a viable article that isn't promotional and get a speedy tag for no reason. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 08:19, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Must have been. In the future, I will use two windows, and dragging the ones that needs to be deleted into the other one. Also, I'l read the content more closely, in case if it was not the same issue. ThatIPEditor Talk · Contribs 08:25, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:YOUNGGJNONi
Hello ThatIPEditor, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:YOUNGGJNONi, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. GeneralNotability (talk) 03:37, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * No problemo. Sorry for the late response. Just a note to whoever sees this, it still ends getting g11 deleted. ThatIPEditor (talk) 12:59, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Ali Sadpara
Hi there! I noticed that you reverted an edit by IP 86.20.255.109 on this page with a note that it was for unexplained content removal, but the IP did state their reason ("rv spam link") and they were also correct in identifying the spam. Please be careful undoing edits, especially with automated or semi-automated tools. Thanks much! NekoKatsun (nyaa) 23:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Ahh okie. Looking in the edit, seemed like that the IP just removed the spam links, and the things that the spam links are about. Yeah, I origionally thought that the IP was removing citations. Thanks though! ThatIPEditor (talk) 23:54, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

/* Overview */ Hi
Halo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.25.16.129 (talk)
 * 98.25.16.129, How may I help you?ThatIPEditor Talk · Contribs 04:03, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also: HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 17:33, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Your GA nomination of Dog
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dog you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wretchskull -- Wretchskull (talk) 19:21, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dog
The article Dog you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Dog for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wretchskull -- Wretchskull (talk) 19:41, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Marking edits as vandalism
Please take care when marking edits as vandalism, as you did on the Superman: Red Son article here. The edit you reverted was not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. For reference, in the animated adaptation of Red Son, the Bizarro clone is referred to as Superior Man. - Aoidh (talk) 01:08, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Icee Dan
Hello ThatIPEditor. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Icee Dan, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. Ged UK  16:09, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Incorrect measurements of Pardosa Amentata.
Hi, I tried to edit the measurements on the information page, but for some reason it was undone. On the page, it has the Pardosa Amentata measuring 5-8cm, which is incorrect, as this should be 5-8mm. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.233.153.89 (talk) 10:13, 22 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Ahh ok, I originally thought that it would be 5-8 cm long because, in the compare revisions, you can't see images. Sorry about that. Feel free to make the edit again :D ThatIPEditor Talk · Contribs 10:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello from Wikipedia
Hello from Wikipedia, great work on the HSW and Wikipedia in general! Thundercraft5 (talk) 01:07, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Ooh, you are here too! Welcome! ThatIPEditor Talk · Contribs 01:19, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi ThatIPEditor. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have&#32;temporarily [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3AThatIPEditor enabled] rollback on your account&#32;until 2021-06-20. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Anarchyte ( talk ) 16:50, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Rollback granted
Hi ThatIPEditor. After reviewing your request, I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3AThatIPEditor enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when using rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Seddon talk 00:51, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Tool tagging
Hi, just a note to say that when using a semi-automated tool, it is good and standard practice to ensure the edits are tagged so that other editors know that you have used a tool. These edits have lacked a tag/marker of the tool used. You don't need to do anything too fancy, you can simply add a link to the script page in your edit summaries to prevent confusion. Hope this helps, ✨ Ed  talk!  ✨ 06:06, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Hey there, I didn't really know this was a thing when I changed it up. Thanks for reminding me. I'll be sure to add a link before my next RW action. I'm currently working on changing a lot of things with it, and I'll be sure to bundle it in. Thanks! ThatIPEditor Talk · Contribs 06:11, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, you don't have to call it RedWarn btw, as long as you keep the copyright notices in the code ✨ Ed  talk!  ✨ 02:01, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC)