User talk:ThatOhioGuy

Welcome!
Hello, ThatOhioGuy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 17:36, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at User talk:Quinton Feldberg, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 17:51, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:21, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Elite Indoor Football


The article Elite Indoor Football has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Appears non-notable per WP:GNG (currently unsourced because it is new, however, even a search of news sources turns up three mentions mostly about the Cape Fear Heroes playing a game against the Steam). There is not even any WP:ROUTINE coverage (something that is not enough to GNG and typically only proves existance) of this and despite having already played one season, no scores or records were ever reported. Not to mention, the games I did find reported on their self-published social media platforms, for an 'indoor' football league all but two games were played outdoors and the other two (maybe up to four, hard to tell which were actually played) were in the unnamed converted warehouse. As of right now, this is still WP:TOOSOON for notability here."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yosemiter (talk) 16:20, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Elite Indoor Football for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elite Indoor Football is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Elite Indoor Football until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yosemiter (talk) 18:33, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Elite Indoor Football
Thanks for creating the Elite Indoor Football article! I noticed that the article doesn't cite any sources. When adding or changing info, please be sure to cite your sources. Thank you. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 00:40, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Updating standings
Please see this edit for how to fully update standings. Thank you, Yosemiter (talk) 21:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rochester Kings
Hello, ThatOhioGuy. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Rochester Kings, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit edit the page]
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Dom from Paris (talk) 16:47, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Rochester Kings for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rochester Kings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rochester Kings until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dom from Paris (talk) 18:15, 3 February 2018 (UTC)