User talk:Thatgonegirl

April 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Would I Lie to You? (TV series) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:54, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Would I Lie to You? (TV series) was changed by Thatgonegirl (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.879172 on 2018-04-27T06:54:24+00:00.

Proposed deletion of Beau (short film)


The article Beau (short film) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable short film lacking in-depth, non-trivial support."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. red dogsix (talk) 02:32, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Beau (short film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beau (short film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Beau (short film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. red dogsix (talk) 13:18, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2020
Hello, I'm Magnolia677. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Baauer, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:33, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

September 2023
Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the Amazon Women in the Mood plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 15:59, 28 September 2023 (UTC)


 * hello, thank you for getting in touch. i think it is at least important to include the skeletons with the crushed pelvises for context as otherwise mentioning "death by snu snu" comes completely out of nowhere. Thatgonegirl (talk) 01:15, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Please see MOS:TVPLOT. DonIago, we need to cut this in half. Drmies (talk) 01:18, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
 * respectfully, now it's worse and makes even less sense. want me to rewrite it from the ground up? Thatgonegirl (talk) 01:24, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
 * If you can do so in a way that keeps the summary within the recommended word count guideline, I'm open to seeing what you come up with. I can't speak as to whether I'll feel it's better or worse than what's currently there without having a chance to review it, of course.
 * Another option is to start a discussion at the article's Talk page as to whether we should waive the guideline, but I have a tough time imagining you'd get a consensus for that in this instance. DonIago (talk) 01:35, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
 * ok, tried something. i wasn't able to do an accurate word count, but it fits in about the same space as the previous version. Thatgonegirl (talk) 02:46, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
 * You are correct: that's 266 words. Drmies (talk) 13:04, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)