User talk:ThatsNotCanon

March 2018
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to 1999 in music, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Stop adding star wars to everything - it's irrelevant and you've continued to mess up formatting. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  21:14, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Who are you to define relevance?
The point of an encyclopedia is the get lots of useless information in a easy to access place. The things I have added are actual facts. The layout looks fine too me. ThatsNotCanon (talk) 21:50, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
Your recent editing history at 1999 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 02:59, 14 March 2018 (UTC)