User talk:TheAmazingChandler

Please check reference before you edit
Your edit in American Idol has been reverted. The rankings have references, please check references before changing, and supply an alternate reference when you change. There are various ways of ranking TV shows, by holdhold ratings, by total viewer numbers, by 18/49 demo. This ranking is by viewers number, and is consistent across all years. News outlets used to prefer household ranking for ranking, now it's more total viewer numbers, but as far as the TV network is concernd, the only rating that matters is the 18/49 demo because that is what determines advertising rate, and so their income. Hzh (talk) 08:51, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  :- ) Don 01:44, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Shogun vs Vera.jpg
Hi,

I have nominated this image for deletion on Wikimedia Commons, because Commons accepts only freely licensed media files, and just because an image is available on the web without cost ("for free"), this doesn't mean that we have permission to release is under a free license (which e.g. allows people to use it elsewhere without payment, too).

It may be possible to upload the same image here on the English Wikipedia, though, under the exceptions described at Non-free content.

Regards, HaeB (talk) 05:14, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Edit summary.
Hey, I see that you do a lot of edits of the ufc event pages. I just want to ask you if you do edit a page, you type in the summary what you changed exactly. Then others can see what has changed. Thanks in advance ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by SiMntjMMA (talk • contribs) 12:11, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you
I will drop a couple of lines to thank you for your valuable contributions in MMA articles. Happy editing!

LlamaAl (talk) 02:54, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

MMA Event Notability
You are invited to join the discussion at WT:MMA. Kevlar (talk) 19:14, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

WT:MMA
I think you might like to have a look at the outcome of the RfC on flags in MMA articles here. --LlamaAl (talk) 01:16, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

I saw it, but didnt agrre. it's pointless to remove flags. Since the beggining of wikipedia there were flags. Nonsense decision.
 * I didn't agree as well, but we should respect that decision. Remember this. --LlamaAl (talk) 01:22, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

I got it and accept it. But you guys should worry with things like the people who always wants to delete UFC records (who appears in every few months and they achieved that goal with UFC 155 and 156) and the people who do vandalism on the pages, not removing the nationality of the fighters. TheAmazingChandler (talk)

December 2012
Your recent editing history at 2012 in UFC shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poison Whiskey  (talk • contribs)  03:00, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

May 2014
Hello, I'm AldezD. An edit that you recently made to Cheers seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! AldezD (talk) 14:56, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)