User talk:TheArguer/Archive 1

False warning
Since when is reverting vandalism considered an unconstructive edit? Please revert your edit to my talk page. 98.248.32.44 (talk) 05:19, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Another False warning
I corrected a song title on the John Lennon Collection page and you placed a warning on my page, I'm presuming because you've got a bot to automatically flag any insertions of that particular word (which IS a part of the song title) on any page. Please revert your edit to my talk page. Sonitus (talk) 23:01, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for reverting vandalism on my User:talk Wikipedia!WebFlower1 (talk) 04:57, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Rollback
Hello, this is just to let you know that I've granted you Rollback rights. Just remember:
 * Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
 * Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
 * Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
 * Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
 * Please read Help:Reverting and Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
 * You can test Rollback at New admin school/Rollback
 * You may wish to display the User wikipedia/rollback userbox and/or the Rollback top icon on your user page
 * If you have any questions, please do let me know.

 Wifione  Message 07:29, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Could you explain this edit please?
, why did you expand and even research the name of the earthquake for a fresh ip addition that was not only blatant vandalism, but obviously an absurd addition? (there is No way that was just to Be funny). This does not behoove someone who was recently granted rollbacker rights.Dave (talk) 14:27, 21 March 2012(UTC)


 * Must have been a mistake Dave. AGF here. Wifione  Message 15:18, 21 March 2012(UTC)
 * Agreed, When I first saw this I thought it was pretty egregious. But the more look at it, it is easily explainable by a lack of caffeine, etc. My apologies if my first response sounded biting. Dave (talk) 17:03, 21 March 2012(UTC)
 * Sorry that I'm human. After reverting edits such as "james wuz here," things like this look promising. I even left a nice welcome note on the offender's talk page. I'm glad a real roadgeek looked into it further. I'm not terribly familiar with U.S. Routes and I obviously need to start researching. If it was an Interstate route, I probably would have caught the bullshit, as U.S. Route 6 isn't even remotely close to AZ. No offense taken. Have a good day. =)  TheArguer  SAY HI! 21:39, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm quite confused as to how this happened... how does a road temporarily exist during two earthquakes? Especially one in Japan? --Rschen7754 23:20, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Lupin's Anti-vandal tool flagged the word "freak" in this edit. I'm usually dealing with absolutely ridiculous edits. I didn't look close enough, it seemed legit, and I wikified it. If I saw the map of the route or actually took time to think about the edit, I would have caught what happened. I don't really know what debating my edit is going to accomplish. I made a stupid mistake, and it was corrected.  TheArguer  SAY HI! 23:40, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * All I'm saying is to slow down, and to be careful; quality over quantity here. --Rschen7754 00:31, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Edit to Demi Moore
So just because you think its unconstructive you delete it? Look at the pics. Demi's pussy is extremely hairy. Please revert your edit now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iwannawikiu (talk • contribs) 22:14, 2 December 2012‎
 * Comment: Honestly, I don't see how it was constructive. It seemed unencyclopedic to me, which was probably the reason for the revert. Not to mention, you've been making edits on other articles such as Paula Deen that add negative information. Lugia2453 (talk) 22:20, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

It's not "negative information." Deen is overweight. FACT. Moore's pussy, as featured in Oui, was extremely hairy. FACT. I am simply providing an expansion of information for the wikipedia user and enhancing their experience. I trust that you will revert these edits immediately.


 * These edits not follow Wikipedia's policy regarding information on biography of a living person. I will not revert my edit at this time. TheArguer  SAY HI! 22:29, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

What part of the policy does it not follow. Cut the bullshit and revert the edit, this is petty. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iwannawikiu (talk • contribs) 22:34, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Please read it; it's pretty self-explanatory. TheArguer  SAY HI! 22:42, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

How did I attack her?
Dude, I just told them that they were a meanie-jerk. Antony Dauis — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.175.114.35 (talk) 23:59, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * "Insulting or disparaging an editor is a personal attack..." TheArguer  SAY HI! 00:08, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

I sees it and I still think I didn,t attack them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.175.114.35 (talk) 00:52, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

HEY
WHY DID YOU SEND ME A MESSAGE SAYING MY EDIT WAS BAD? I REMOVED A FRENCH WORD THAT SHOULDN'T BE ON THE ENGLISH PAGE TO DESCRIBE MEXICAN FOOD...

GENIUS — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.160.148.103 (talk) 00:34, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Foreign reactions to Sandy Hook article
I undid your removal of that section and started a discussion on the talk, which I hope you join. Shadowjams (talk) 01:36, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Message from 90.244.146.125
There is nothing neutral about 'anti-feminism' or for that matter feminism. And nothing objective about feminist proper-gander and your removal of valid anti-feminist views. such is bias and none objective by a feminist *you) when each anti-feminist point is too valid to be argued against. — Preceding unsigned comment added by90.244.146.125 (talk) 22:03, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Regardless, you cannot add personal commentary into articles as doing so goes against Wikipedia's Core Content Policies. TheArguer  SAY HI! 22:36, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Message from John.Toth.uk..essex
i want to add this line to the page

Without knowing the actual time scale outside the "Universe".We can never be sure of the actual "Universal Time Scale" within this Universe.

its true without knowing how time exsists outside the universe then people will never know how time realy exsists inside this universe making all calculations inaccurate.is very simple to understand.earth time is just make beleaive and meaningless in relevance to the universe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by John.Toth.uk..essex (talk • contribs) 22:14, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

no i wont bother updating page again bye have a good life...... — Preceding unsigned comment added by John.Toth.uk..essex (talk • contribs) 22:21, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

how simple is that cant beleive you want page link to source something so simple and so obvious... — Preceding unsigned comment added by John.Toth.uk..essex (talk • contribs) 22:27, 23 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Just because you say something is true doesn't make it true. If you want it in the article, please find and reference an appropriate source to comply with Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. TheArguer  SAY HI! 22:36, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

its not that important cant be bothered. bye have a good day.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by John.Toth.uk..essex (talk • contribs) 22:45, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

if i know something is true in my mind then i say it if it was not true i would not say so.. im a very thoughtful person.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by John.Toth.uk..essex (talk • contribs) 22:49, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

if i locked you in a room for 7 days at the begining of the 7 days i start a clock outside the room. then after 7 days i give you a clock inside the room and ask you to set your clock to the exact time of my clock outside the room without seeing my clock i dont beleive its possible for you to do that.

thats the same thing i just said about the universe impossible to know how long we have been inside the universe without seeing the clock outside of this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by John.Toth.uk..essex (talk • contribs) 23:01, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * That's nice. If you would like to add this to the article, you need to find an appropriate source. Attempting to convince me that you're right doesn't accomplish anything. TheArguer  SAY HI! 23:06, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

in that example clock meaning machanical or biological because this universe could be either.know one knows — Preceding unsigned comment added by John.Toth.uk..essex (talk • contribs) 23:08, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

ok no problem when i get time ill look for a source

would like to add that 1 line sometime if possible in a good way without degrading the importance of that page.would just like to make that page a little more varible..

have a good night there arguer.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by John.Toth.uk..essex (talk • contribs) 23:17, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

December 23, 2012
Sorry about the Cali Swag District editing Article confusion. Sincerely, Spindocter123 (talk) 00:06, 24 December 2012 (UTC)


 * No worries. TheArguer  SAY HI! 00:11, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Change to Church Universal and Triumphant
Hi, I'm curious why you undid my addition to the Church Universal and Triumphant's page? I am a member of the church.

Best, George — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.45.108.227 (talk) 01:24, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Re: Aloysia citrodora/ Cedrón
Yes, you made a mistake. In future, before unilaterally deleting something that is clearly not vandalism, I recommend performing some research. Spanish language wikipedia has an article which clearly notes "cedrón" as (one of the) Spanish name(s) for Aloysia citrodora in South America (the place of the plant's origin): Here.

On top of that, here's a photo of the commonly available product: Image

It's important to remember the purpose of references: to back up contentious information. We don't reference the colour green every time we describe something using that word, because we all know what green is and it's not contentious. Similarly, the common name for something as spoken by millions is not contentious - except to those who are unfamilar with that area. In which case, those people should not be editing articles on topics with which they are unfamiliar.

190.160.200.89 (talk) 14:37, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I never said that your edit was vandalism, and I never said that your edit was untrue. Wikipedia policy states that "any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed." So that's what I did. I am not familiar with shrubs, but your claim that I should not edit a shrub article because of that is completely absurd. This is a Wikipedia article on the English Wikipedia, not Spanish Wikipedia. Chances are that most people reading the article are not from Chile. Because of this, it is completely appropriate and necessary to cite your claim, and I did not make a mistake. I hope I've cleared up any confusion. TheArguer  SAY HI! 08:26, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Message from Syrus2013: Doof Wikipedia Page
Dude I am the original cast and krew from the culture, my name is simon antony roberts doe: 8/12/78 - i had been going as wishcraft in xoops.org for sometime, i am just making some requested changes that have been polled to be made on the page will you please revert as it is relievent and true and in our subculture we have other syabasis of english and gramagramication so please resolve you revert.. Thanks you are not the elite overlord like myself

http://twitter.com/espacey — Preceding unsigned comment added by Syrus2013 (talk • contribs) 11:02, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Message from Autodidact1
I added it because I have watched every one of the plays at least two times (have you?), and I also sent an e-mail about subtitles to Michael Colgan, the Artistic Director (which he ignored). I doubt that you can understand all of the dialogue in the plays, assuming that you are a speaker of American English and not an immigrant. These plays are inaccessible to the majority of American viewers in their present state, no matter if they speak English or Spanish or if they are deaf or if their hearing is impaired (as is mine). The addition of subtitles would not have placed a burden on the producers. Instead, they chose not to spend a penny on them, even though their budget was US$9,000,00, much of it from the public sector. Why don't you send a e-mail to Mr. Colgan? Perhaps he can justify this arrogance? My comments are accurate and serve the needs of consumers. Would you spend US$130.00 (per Amazon) on films you couldn't understand? I didn't cite a source because I couldn't find one, nor do I think it's necessary. This is a matter of observation. Please restore my edit. Thanks.Autodidact1 (talk) 11:25, 30 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Unless you can find a source to back that up, I will not undo my edit. TheArguer  SAY HI! 11:36, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

You failed to refute any of my objections to your arbitrary action. There are no subtitles. Let someone who has actually viewed these films do the editing. Autodidact1 (talk) 11:53, 30 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Please view Wikipedia's policy on verifiability, which states that "even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it." You said that you couldn't find a source. If no sources exist, this is original research and cannot be added to the article. TheArguer  SAY HI! 11:57, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Marita Koch article
My changes are honest and accurate, I can provide citations, if you reinstate my additions I can provide references — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.75.110.65 (talk) 12:53, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Message from 93.228.145.164
hi, i am jan koemmet and i think, i have the rights, to make some corrections in my wikipedia profile! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.228.145.164 (talk) 12:16, 30 December 2012 (UTC)


 * You have the right, but it needs to follow the manual of style. You also need to check out Wikipedia's policy on editing an article about yourself. TheArguer  SAY HI! 12:25, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

o.k. thank very much for this information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.228.145.164 (talk) 13:04, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism and attack pages
Thank you for reverting Vandalism to an article I'm working on, Province of North Carolina. That event stemmed from my repeated nominations for speedy deletion of the page Peter Jacobs (Lunatic). The author, User talk:Chris333999 is apparently intent on not only evading CSD, but vandalizing my stuff as well. Cdtew (talk) 14:36, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
 * And ow he's vandalizing my user page. please help! Cdtew (talk) 14:38, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem. I'll do my best. =) TheArguer  SAY HI! 14:41, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Edit summary
Hi. Your edit summary here was actually incorrect. Thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 00:59, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Typo fixes causing more typos? :)
Hey, TheArguer! I saw this edit of yours that seemed to introduce a typo in an edit meant to fix a typo, and just wanted to leave a playful nudge: maybe that means it's time for bed? :) (Just FYI: I'm about to do that myself; you have no idea how many times I misspelled "typo" in this section header. :P ) Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 04:52, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * It's my keyboard's fault, I promise! =) I'm not tired yet, so I'll make sure to be a bit more careful in my edits. Thanks for the heads up. TheArguer  SAY HI! 04:57, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh, no worries about that; if you're happy, I'm happy. Just checking in. :) Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 05:02, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

I was just sent a message saying that I made an edit to the 'Paddy McCourt' page. I never made such an edit, I have never even heard of the man before today, I believe this message was sent in error. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.45.47.58 (talk) 22:42, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

About my edit
If you look into the 2015 Atlantic Hurricane Season article, you can see that the strongest storm in infobox implied that's Hurricane Joaquin the strongest with 967mbar.--142.167.118.180 (talk) 23:17, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)