User talk:TheBeatlesHere

Hunter Prey (film)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Hunter Prey (film), and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.hunterpreythemovie.com/mission.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:21, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Bender176 Talk to me 03:24, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Clock Tower (film)


The article Clock Tower (film) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * not clear how this might meet WP:FILM lacks any references to 3rd party reliable sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 11:25, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Copyright block
in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating copyright policy by copying text into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to quote non-free text. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Theleftorium (talk) 11:58, 8 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi. While in most cases you may remove content from your talk page, I am afraid you can't remove a declined unblock request until your block has expired. See User pages. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:30, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Forrest Whaley
A tag has been placed on Forrest Whaley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  ttonyb (talk) 04:25, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. One or more of the external links you added in this edit to the page The Beatles do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. You may wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ 04:26, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Forrest Whaley. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ 04:29, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Forrest Whaley


The article Forrest Whaley has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable amateur film maker. Appears to fail WP:BIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  ttonyb (talk) 04:32, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Forrest Whaley
I have nominated Forrest Whaley, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Forrest Whaley. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — Jeff G. ツ 04:36, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Forrest Whaley
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Forrest Whaley, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Removing these notices will not prevent the article from being deleted. RadioFan (talk) 11:21, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Good article nomination
Please do not add the template to articles that have not gone through the good-article nomination and review process. Repeatedly doing so is considered disruptive and may lead to suspension of editing privileges. If you would like to nominate the Anakin Skywalker article for good article status, you may do so by following the directions at WP:GAN. Thank you. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib

Proposed deletion of 30 Minutes or Less


The article 30 Minutes or Less has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Film is in pre-production. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  ttonyb (talk) 02:06, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hotel Transylvania (film)
A tag has been placed on Hotel Transylvania (film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kudpung (talk) 12:00, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 30 Minutes or Less
A tag has been placed on 30 Minutes or Less requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Theleftorium (talk) 12:16, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating copyright policy by copying text into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously been warned that this is against policy, and you have also previously been blocked for 24 hours because of it. Since you have continued to violate our copyright policy after the previous block, you have now been blocked indefinitely. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest it by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Theleftorium (talk) 12:22, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rambo V: The Savage Hunt (film)


The article Rambo V: The Savage Hunt (film) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Totally unreferenced, only mentions of this film in a Google search is on a few blogs. Fails WP:FILM.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Burpelson AFB (talk) 01:18, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Something Borrowed (film)


The article Something Borrowed (film) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Film not yet out of production.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 22:04, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of The Lorax (film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Lorax (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Lorax (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &mdash; JJ Be  rs  23:09, 1 April 2017 (UTC)