User talk:TheBhramaBull

Speedy deletion of Miss Round's House
A tag has been placed on Miss Round's House requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:33, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:39, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

August 2008
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. Oxymoron83 01:27, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:02, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

NUFC fan statement
Wikipedia is not intended for statements. An article on the NUFC Fan group may be notable and that would link to the statement wherever it was first published. Don't take this as a disagreement with your views. For what it's worth I feel that Keegan has been treated badly. Srushe (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2008 (UTC)