User talk:TheBirdsShedTears/Archives/2021/November

Request on 14:22:28, 2 November 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Watercyclist
Thanks for your feedback on the proposed wikipedia page for the Rural Water Supply Network. Our sister-network, the Sustainable Sanitation Alliance (SuSanA) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sustainable_Sanitation_Alliance does not appear to have significant third-party "Significant Coverage", so I'm struggling a bit to understand what the bar is here that needs to be cleared.

Watercyclist (talk) 14:22, 2 November 2021 (UTC)


 * , Most of the sources are primary. Please see WP:IS. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 14:38, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Kanakam Kaamini Kalaham
I have expanded the article, Draft:Kanakam Kaamini Kalaham by adding more content and references and kept it for re-review. Now the article has more information than the teaser release informations. Moreover the film is going to be released in a week. So I request you to kindly re-review the article and move it to the article space if possible. Sonal Mathew (talk) 11:20, 4 November 2021 (UTC)


 * , Please see WP:NFF TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 11:44, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Your opinion on Tulip Telecom
Hey, this is a company that was shut down [] but it is written in a way that still promotes the company in good light. But, I think the company would be considered notable because there is coverage about it's journey. I nominated the founder for AFD. I wanted to move this to drafts but not sure if that's the right move since it is already reviewed. Please see what should be done here. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:00, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
 * , If you think it is a non-notable company, it should be taken to AfD than moving a ten years old article into draftspace. You may also discuss this issue with who created this article. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 16:41, 6 November 2021 (UTC)


 * I think the company is notable but the page is a mess and might deserve WP:TNT. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 21:27, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Regarding Sándor Belák's article rejection on July 20th
Hello TheBirdsShedTears,

On July 20th you wrote about this article:

''Tagged with cn by reviewers, but issue is still present. Zero improvements. Either cite with reliable sources or remove any sourced material. We cannot accept poorly or unsourced biography of living people.''

I understand. Sorry for the delay but due to circumstances (COVID-19, vacations etc) I was not able to deal with this matter before now. But now I have found a thorough and reliable reference of Sándor Belák in a recent Newsletter of the HUNGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES HUNGARIAN SCIENCE ABROAD PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE, where all facts are confirmed that are in the Wikipedia article. I have put this as a reference nr.3 in the article, which is bilingual in English-Hungarian. I have resubmitted the article. Hope this is good enough, if not, please come back to me.

Thanks for your consideration to this matter, yours --Fmasszi (talk) 15:02, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Request on 08:56:52, 15 November 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Willfullylost
Hello,

You mentioned that local sportspersons are not usually approved, but I used several other fellow Pac-12 football players as a reference to an approved college football athlete's page. What is the difference between these pages? I believe that I had found multiple articles where the subject was the main focus in the article. Another fellow Cal football player that I used as a reference was Chase Garbers. Thank you for taking your time to review my request.

Sincerely, Willfullylost Willfullylost (talk) 08:56, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

new submission of Clay Reynolds author page
Hi, there, I just wanted to let you know that I resubmitted the article you declined on author Clay Reynolds. Sorry for the delay. I tried to make the fixes you suggested. I also added a few more secondary sources. By the way, I learned that the wiki policy on verifiability does allow primary sources to be quoted and provides some rules that must be followed when doing so. In the Talk section on my submission I explain how my draft complies with this official Wikipedia policy. I don't know if you are supposed to review it again, so I am letting you know.