User talk:TheBoatGuy/sandbox

Suggestions/comments on rough draft article
Your lead section is good but it needs a more general introduction sentence unless you plan to keep the one from the original article. You do good covering relevant information to your topic and you have reliable sources. You did a good job with logical organization of subsections of your topic going from more general to more specific aspects. In the categorization section, do you think the categories should be more general as opposed to more specific in the original article? Also, using greater than and less than symbols might not be a good idea because some readers might not know what they mean. I wouldn't caption the picture of fuel tanks with that long of a caption and maybe not use the picture at all since it's hard to even see the labels. The table you created is a good addition because it is a simplified display of information that is easy to understand. I don't think that the flammable sign in Arabic is necessary since the original article already has two pictures of signs. Heppnean (talk) 23:49, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Peer-Feedback
Overall, the article is good. The structure is solid, everything is sourced, and nothing seems out of place. The introductory sentence very specific, so you may want to look into starting with something a little bro. It's a good sentence, but not a great lead. The categorization table could easily be turned into a table to make it easier to read, but it is okay as is. The content is spot on and does not trail off topic, but the pictures could be a little more specific. You may even want to find example pictures for the columns in the Labeling section. I am interested to see what the Storage and Transportation section has in store. Good job!

Hall3jl (talk) 00:42, 16 March 2019 (UTC)