User talk:TheBritishColumbian

Welcome!
Hi TheBritishColumbian! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:



Alternately, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:



If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:



Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!  Cryptic   Canadian  03:16, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Fatty acid ratio in food, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Nutrition is about human health, a topic requiring WP:MEDRS reviews. Your sources do not meet this standard. '' Zefr (talk) 00:09, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, TheBritishColumbian

Thank you for creating Mathe's sign.

User:Spicy, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:


 * Hello and thank you for your comment. Sure! I will use more recent sources. In this case, it won't make any difference as the info provided for the Mathe test is very basic and nothing changed.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Spicy (talk) 00:40, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Global Virtual Performance for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Global Virtual Performance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Global Virtual Performance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lopifalko (talk) 14:20, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

September 2021
Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Plagiarism, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Ninja Diannaa (Talk) 14:48, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Rhodes' Risk Environment Framework
You really ought to do an article on the scientist, who is clearly notable  DGG ( talk ) 09:32, 2 October 2021 (UTC)