User talk:TheCascadian/Archive 4

Re: Feedback Dashboard
Hi Gold Standard, It's not a problem at all to contact me on my talk page. If you saw that I cleaned my talk page, that does not mean I think you are bothering me. Feel free to contact me anytime. About the Feedback Dashboard, it's a bit hard to answer thousands of feedback's everyday by yourself. SwisterTwister also does a very good job answering needy feedbacks, but sadly there is a bug that makes user's unable to reply to feedback's very quickly. It becomes sometimes tedious and redundant, as I feel a bot should answer some of these feedbacks. I can't investigate every user's talk page/contributions when they post a feedback. But I guess "it is, what it is.". As I will try to investigate as much as I can, thank you. Cheers! ---Webclient101 (talk) 20:03, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello Webclient101,


 * I understand your concern with responding to feedback being tedious and redundant, but please note that it would probably be more beneficial to the Feedback Dashboard project if you do investigate every user's talk page/contributions, even if it means you respond to less feedback. Also, please remember that helping is volutary, so don't feel pressure to respond to every bit of feedback if it means you're not checking contribs and talk pages.


 * Thanks, Gold   Standard  20:25, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Interlibertarians for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Interlibertarians is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Interlibertarians until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 16:08, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

New message
You have new messages at Editor review/Gold Standard, if you reply please ping me in my talk page! -- Tito Dutta  ✉  19:53, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
 * You have new message at editor's review page! -- Tito Dutta  ✉  22:13, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Also please see Yumura Onsen (Hyogo) above. LittleBen (talk) 01:38, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikify and the future of wikification
Hi! There is an ongoing proposal at the project talkpage concerning the future of wikification, including possible deprecation of the wikify template which is being discussed at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 August 10. Your input would be greatly appreciated!

You are receiving this message because you are listed as an active member of the wikify project. To update your status, go here.

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:41, 12 August 2012 (UTC) on behalf of Project Wikify

Any updates on images?
Any success with the Washington picture project? --Philosopher Let us reason together. 06:22, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Their lawyers are currently evaluating the licenses and determining how to release the images. Thus, I am still awaiting a final email.  I have considered sending an email requesting the status of the request I made, but the email operator that I contacted at the Washington State Legislative Information Center did say that they would contact me as soon as they heard anything from the lawyers.  Gold   Standard  00:35, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks for the update! Hope it all works out!  --Philosopher Let us reason together. 22:33, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review
This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 27 August 2012 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding  to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:14, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Ban User:Rollosmokes?
After going through a nasty time with User:DreamMcQueen (see my talk page and edit history), it has come to my attention that he is a sockpuppet of User:Rollosmokes. A lengthy review of edits and cases has led me to determine that he should be banned from the Wikipedia all at once. I'm sending you this message because of my personal feelings that I have been abused very harshly by him and is seeking full procedures to ensure all articles within the scope of WP:TVS. I am asking for your opinions on this manoeuvre, which I believe may not be necessary, or should be reduced to simply a topic ban. Please respond here and inform me via my talk page. Note this message has been sent to two other users as well. Thank you! Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234)  16:46, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Articles for Creation urgently needs your help!
Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation. If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page. Happy reviewing!  TheSpecialUser TSU
 * Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 08:59, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Steve Conway State Senator.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Steve Conway State Senator.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:15, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

AfC
I've accepted Anthony N. Michel. At the time you first declined it for not showing notability, and also the second time, there was already sufficient sourced material in the article to fully prove notability according to WP:PROF. It already contained a reference to a festschrift in his honor, and his fellowship in the IEEE, and his holding a named professorship at Notre Dame, and his publications--any of the four would be sufficient. Please review the criteria there before you work on any more academic bios.

You also commented about not using WP as a reference--which is certainly true, but the new editor merely used references where he should have just used links. The true references were always there. This sort of trivial error is not a reason for rejection, but for making the minor fix, either yourself, or by asking the editor to do it. Articles do not have to be perfect to be accepted.  DGG ( talk ) 05:13, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject:Articles for Creation October - November 2012 Backlog Elimination Drive
 WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive! The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 22, 2012 – November 21, 2012.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive. There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out! EdwardsBot (talk) 00:10, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikify: November Newsletter and December Drive

 * Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Wikify, 22:29, 28 November 2012 (UTC)