User talk:TheCatalyst31

Welcome to my talk page. Feel free to leave a message.

Nomination of Churchill, Renville County, Minnesota for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Churchill, Renville County, Minnesota, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Churchill, Renville County, Minnesota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cornell, Modoc County, California


The article Cornell, Modoc County, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable location; seems to have just been a railroad waypoint. Passing mentions could be found:, but no significant coverage or information could be found. No mention in Cook's history of Modoc County: .  Without further information this site is a failure of WP:GEOLAND."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 16:07, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kitson Kapiriel


The article Kitson Kapiriel has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of notability and fulfillment of the GNG"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Invading Invader  (userpage, talk) 20:29, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Black Butte, California


The article Black Butte, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not a community, a non-notable railroad siding named for the nearby mountain of Black Butte, and the adjoining Black Butte Spring. No information found that wasn't about the railroad site, and no evidence was found that this was ever truly a community. It's hard to find information unambiguously about Black Butte (most coverage is of the mountain and surrounding area, or other California places with this name), making this article confusing as well as uninformative.  Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG without further information."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 03:05, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Clear Creek, Siskiyou County, California


The article Clear Creek, Siskiyou County, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable location. Little information found, although nondescript name makes it hard to find mentions that are unambiguously about this place. The cited sources (GNIS and a map) are sufficient for verifiability but not notability, and without further information this place fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.  Satellite view just shows two houses along a river."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 03:08, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Valerie, California


The article Valerie, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable location. No information found; not mentioned at all in either Holmes' (https://books.google.com/books?id=wm8UAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=riverside+county&newbks=0&hl=en&ovso=1#v=onepage&q=valerie&f=false]) or Lech's histories of Riverside County.  Satellite view shows a rural intersection with a gas station.  Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:22, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wadstrom, California


The article Wadstrom, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable location; no evidence this was anything more than a railroad waypoint, and not a 'community'. Not one mention in three histories of Ventura County:,, . Satellite view just shows an industrial area on the outskirts of Ventura.  Cited sources are not sufficient for notability; being in GNIS or being on a railroad line do not confer notability.  Glaring failure of WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:29, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Honda, California


The article Honda, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable rail siding, not an 'unincorporated community'. See maps at . Cited sources do not establish notability; fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:56, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Largo Vista, California


The article Largo Vista, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence that this location has encyclopedic notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Unreferenced articles February 2024 backlog drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Editor experience invitation
Hi TheCatalyst31 :) I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss 🍀  (talk) 19:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Linwood, Iowa for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Linwood, Iowa, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Linwood, Iowa (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red February 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:11, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Nomination of Indian Springs, Los Angeles County, California for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Indian Springs, Los Angeles County, California, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Indian Springs, Los Angeles County, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red March 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Proposed deletion of Leahy, Washington


The article Leahy, Washington has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable location; GNIS does not establish notability. Only mention of this place is a 1935 column describing the daily activities of several people 'of Leahy':, which is a trivial mention. No other sources found.  Satellite view of coordinates shows a rural intersection with two (2) buildings and two (2) trees.  Fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dulah, California


The article Dulah, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable location. The article itself says Dulah was just a rail siding, which is not a recognized place per WP:GEOLAND. GNIS is not sufficient for notability, and the other two sources do not mention Dulah at all.  No information found. Complete waste of bandwidth."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Deadwood, Tuolumne County, California


The article Deadwood, Tuolumne County, California has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Article is factually incorrect. Look at the satellite image of the coordinates: . Does this look like a 'community' located on a logging railroad?  No, it looks like two dirt tracks meeting in the middle of the forest, and zero other information could be found.  GNIS and a place-names book are both considered unreliable for purposes of notability.  Fails WP:V and WP:GEOLAND."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Han Kum-ok


The article Han Kum-ok has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of notability, nothing in English or Korean that I can find"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. toobigtokale (talk) 21:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

"Dulah, California" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dulah,_California&redirect=no Dulah, California] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red April 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:44, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Nomination of Seward, Oklahoma for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Seward, Oklahoma, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Seward, Oklahoma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red May 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Nomination of Deadman Crossing, Ohio for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deadman Crossing, Ohio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Deadman Crossing, Ohio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. signed,Rosguill talk 17:17, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

 * You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. 

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cloverland, Washington


The article Cloverland, Washington has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The article only has one source that that says it's a populated place (GNIS, source 1). GNIS is not considered reliable by the Wikipedia community for the classification of places. The Second source is a coat hanger for the garage. Unfortunately, notability of the Garage is not transferable per WP:GNG. Both commonly used Washington placename books don't list this place . The Washington newspapers contain articles about a farming district named cloverland and state that it is the farmland surrounded by the forks of Asotin creek. Basically, an Orchard . There are a couple of google hits implying it's a town, but looking at the actual sources, you see that it's just a rural area. This source, helps explain that it was the name of the voting precinct at one time . There is a website claiming it's a ghost town that lookis convincing but it is copied from one of the sources that misrepresented the place, and there was only a cemetary and a garage which isn't the makings of a town. The fruit operation mentioned in the newspapers failed to pan out, and the area became wheat fields instead of a town. That Garage seems to be all that was ever there. "

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James.folsom (talk) 00:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Cloverland, Washington for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cloverland, Washington is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cloverland, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. James.folsom (talk) 20:29, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Dabney Crossroads, Mississippi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dabney Crossroads, Mississippi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dabney Crossroads, Mississippi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Hog Farm Talk 03:20, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

"Dulah, CA" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dulah,_CA&redirect=no Dulah, CA] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 09:35, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red June 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Nomination of Trump, Ohio for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trump, Ohio, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Trump, Ohio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nooseneck, Rhode Island


The article Nooseneck, Rhode Island has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Topos show a 'Nooseneck Division' but no community named as such. Newspapers.com results are about a 'Nooseneck Hill' or Road. Notability not established with substantive sources."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 19:32, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red August 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Nomination of Eastport, Idaho for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eastport, Idaho is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Eastport, Idaho until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 03:46, 3 July 2024 (UTC)