User talk:TheChapriVerse

Speedy deletion nomination of User:TheChapriVerse


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:TheChapriVerse requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:37, 29 June 2022 (UTC)


 * But nothing here is against Wikipedia Guidelines. I use Wikipedia User template and what is wrong in that. Wikipedia itself allowed all users to do so. Please retrieve my page or clarify me what I have done wrong.
 * You’re sincerely Gorav Sharma TheChapriVerse (talk) 14:11, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (But Wikipedia itself provided the template. I have no problem with deletion if it’s against Wikipedia Guidelines but I’m in shock because “If template is against Wikipedia Guidelines then why Wikipedia allowed it?” ) --Gorav Sharma (talk) 14:15, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of &#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/GoravSharma0245. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. firefly ( t · c ) 14:50, 29 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Yeah I agree, but what is against Guidelines Here?
 * Having multiple accounts is legal in Wikipedia. I also didn’t edit anything till now. Then why? TheChapriVerse (talk) 14:53, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
 * @TheChapriVerse: you were blocked. You used another account to evade the block. You were blocked for a reason and you think you can just create a new account and pretend like nothing has happened? Here's my advice. Read WP:SO carefully. Do not reply to this message or your talk page access may be removed. 0x Deadbeef 03:00, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Not a block evasion
As I said in last paragraph that was not a block evasion. It’s ok if I remained blocked but delete one of the sockpuppet User:Thegoravsharma as i have same username on social media & every other place and it is causing many serious conflicts in my personal & social life. If not delete than atleast rename that account. Please User:Ohnoitsjamie, one last request. (I waited 8 long months for this) TheChapriVerse (talk) 20:00, 1 March 2023 (UTC)