User talk:TheDJ/Archive 15

File:Bigfootflippingoff.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bigfootflippingoff.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jordan 1972 (talk) 17:39, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge can you sort that out, it's messed up.♦ Dr. Blofeld  15:39, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:WikiProject British TV channels
Template:WikiProject British TV channels has been nominated for merging with Template:WikiProject Television. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 23:17, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:WikiProject British television
Template:WikiProject British television has been nominated for merging with Template:WikiProject Television. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 15:48, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:WikiProject Heroes
Template:WikiProject Heroes has been nominated for merging with Template:WikiProject Television. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 19:42, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

mobile variant css formatting
Thanks so much for your work on Template:Intro to single/styles.css. I'm trying to update Template:Intro_to/sandbox at the moment and I just wanted to check what the following bit of code does: @media screen and (min-width: 1101px) { .introtosingle__main { max-width: 1100px; } }

Do you know if there's away to specify different CSS when on a mobile screen? In particular, on mobile for the left-hand menu items: 1) omitting vertical padding between the menu items and 2) omitting their subtitles. Is there a way to implement the equivalent of: .mw-parser-output .onlymobile { display: block; }

Thanks for any ideas! T.Shafee(Evo &#38; Evo)talk 05:11, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , "what the following bit of code does:" When the screen is 1101pixels or wider, limit the width of introtosingle__main to 1100pixels (instead of the default to make it as wide as required to fit the content (aka auto)). Note I chose these pixel values because i wanted to preserve the width that was set in the original version of the template, which was 1100pixels.
 * "different CSS when on a mobile screen" I just explained one ☝️. In general it is best not to assume a device, instead just work with the available width and adapt the styling based on that (viewport width breakpoints). See also something like: meta:Template:Main_Page/styles.css used for the main page of meta. —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 14:45, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 * "different CSS when on a mobile screen" I just explained one ☝️. In general it is best not to assume a device, instead just work with the available width and adapt the styling based on that (viewport width breakpoints). See also something like: meta:Template:Main_Page/styles.css used for the main page of meta. —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 14:45, 29 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Perfect - thank you! Very good point about basing it on display size rather than device. That way if put in a narrow window on a desktop display it'd make itself similarly compact for readability to how it would on a phone, whereas on a large tablet, it'd still make use of the available space. T.Shafee(Evo &#38; Evo)talk 23:44, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I think I've managed to get something sensible working at Template:Intro_to/styles.css. If you have a moment to cast an eye over the changes in behaviour at 1100px and 800px screen width I'd be intersted in your throughts. Also, is there pros and cons to merging Template:Intro_to/styles.css and Template:Intro_to_single/styles.css? Thanks! T.Shafee(Evo &#38; Evo)talk 23:24, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
 * , sorry, i haven't had time for this yet. I hope to look at it soon. —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 10:39, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Lang titlepart
Hey, I'm trying to understand what valid use Lang titlepart has, as when I tested it, it produces a warning message for incorrect use. --Gonnym (talk) 09:43, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * , must have not used it correctly: : "". The purpose is to use this inside DISPLAYTITLE usages, when you want to markup a single word inside a title as being in a foreign language. It's really a shortcut od lang with disabled categorisation. —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 10:35, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Example —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 10:38, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Ok, now I see. Thanks. Just out of curiosity, have you ever seen a use-case for this? Asking as this isn't used anywhere for a 8+ year template. --Gonnym (talk) 10:59, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * , it was used back then, but i guess the uses got replaced. it's creation was the result of an WP:VP/T discussion. —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 11:59, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

responsiveContent
Howdy TheDJ - Through a process of elimination I discovered that responsiveContent was causing the problem seen in the image to the right—I'm not sure what to call it. Wordwrap (text wrap) not working? Or margins? Image placement? - I'm sure you'll know! Main point is it made it really hard to read the text to the left of the table.

Background & specifications info

 * See Talk:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic for my initial discussion with other editors, who helped me problem solve.


 * I followed the instructions at mw:Help:Locating broken scripts.


 * I use the Vector skin.


 * Windows 10 Pro, version 1909, installed on 2 Aug 2019, OS build 18363.752


 * Google Chrome Version 81.0.4044.92 (Official Build) (64-bit)

Thanks! - Mark D Worthen PsyD  (talk)   (I'm a man—traditional male pronouns are fine.)  07:25, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , i'm unable to reproduce with Chrome 81.0.4044.92. Possibly that means that it is a combination of modifications/gadgets that you have installed, or a fluke, or it requires very specific set of page content conditions. —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 15:27, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Cool. Hopefully that means it's a rare occurrence! Thank you very much  - Mark D Worthen PsyD   (talk)   (I'm a man—traditional male pronouns are fine.)  15:40, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Discussion re Common.js
I started a discussion at MediaWiki talk:Common.js that you might be interested in. Enterprisey (talk!) 02:09, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

/* heres to being kind to us beggeners */

 * D :D :D — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thebaconhalrguru (talk • contribs) 16:08, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Questionnaire invitation (a new tool to be developed, to verify media data)
Hi there, I'm developing a tool to assist users in verifying (structured) data of media on commons.

To understand the community's needs, I would like to invite you to participate in this questionnaire: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScbNdJdQYN1yBvEeKne48eWDU6SBsdlUfNBAmZyvUEBkCR1Gg/viewform?usp=sf_link. It should take ~2 minutes.

Thanks a lot. :D

(You received this message as you seems to have experience with structured data on Wikimedia projects.)

-- Gabrielchl (talk) 00:04, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

WikiLoop Battlefield new name vote
Dear TheDJ,

Thank you for your interest and contributions to WikiLoop Battlefield. We are holding a voting for proposed new name. We would like to invite you to this voting. The voting is held at m:WikiProject_WikiLoop/New_name_vote and ends on July 13th 00:00 UTC.

xinbenlv Talk, Remember to "ping" me 05:15, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Emptying comon.css?
Hey, TheDJ, I saw on the thread at Mediawiki talk:Common.css where you said that we are trying to empty this file. I am absolutely not disputing that, it squares with everything I've seen on that page, but is there a discussion or decision you can point to where that choice was made? Timeshifter is being...insistent about it, and I feel that being able to point them to writing that says, "try not to add things to common.css" might be helpful, if it exists. Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 16:19, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
 * , there is a longstanding convention upheld by the MediaWiki:Common.css maintainers to add as little CSS as possible. There is also longstanding convention to prefer inline styles (and later TemplateStyles) over classes being added to MediaWiki:Common.css. These are simply logical conclusions from the fact that any CSS on site wide CSS pages gets delivered on every single pageview, regardless of wether they are needed by that page. I'm not sure if that was ever documented.
 * But one of the whole points of TemplateStyles was to find a way to address this problem. See also mw:Help:TemplateStyles. Unfortunately en.wp has a LOT of legacy. So 4 years later and important constructs like mbox, infobox, navbox still make use of Common.css, simply because trying to change that is so much work and is likely to result in so many angry comments by those who only care about the tiny breakages and not the technical details, that this transition is still far from over.
 * Timeshifter is right that TemplateStyles are not entirely ideal in this situation, as tables are often used without templates. So it is a bit silly to have to put a templatestyles tag inside the wiki text directly to fix this. However, it is the best we have. Wrap the template styles in a separate table alignment classes that people can include just before the table and I think you also have a decent fix. —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 11:44, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I have made a comment on this last one on the related VPT thread. --Izno (talk) 12:01, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck
Hi , you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page. Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly! María Cruz

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC) If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.

testje
mijn test

Quick question
Do you think that Village pump (policy) (or whatever of that is realistically feasible) would be small enough to handle in the Community Wishlist? (Please ping me.) Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 02:20, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , probably yes. —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 12:35, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

New, simpler RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck
HI , I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users. Thanks and see you around online, María Cruz MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC) If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.

Actual Live Preview
Hello! I tried this script a few years back and was not able to get it to work. Tried it again today and had the same issue. I've tried changing skins in case that was a conflict. When I extend my window horizontally, all it does is extend the margins, not bring the preview alongside the text box. Any advice? It's a great idea. czar 01:30, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

PerfektesChaos decorated, and positioning of coordinates
Thank you for your kind nomination. While deWP is attempting to solve a similar problem, I happened to dig in enWP gutts. Greetings --PerfektesChaos (talk) 14:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Now the decorative present arrived.
 * However, I will put an image of the giveaway on my awards page and wear a virtual shirt.
 * At T91481 you wrote in 2016: the coordinates template should never be restricted to such a “top” spot, but should also have an appropriate corresponding inline position
 * I learnt that it’s official policy at enWP to show regular coordinates and map link inside article contents, and use the thing in the top right corner as duplicate only.
 * The thing is clipped away in mobile skin.
 * Almost 60 % of accessing enWP article space pages for reading view seem to use mobile.
 * On sightseeing it is most valuable to read the article of next monument, get the map, indicated your position and see that there are less than 200 steps to walk. Bad fate if no map link is available on cell phone.
 * For future desktop skin development content area is supposed to be clipped for security reasons.
 * By accident or vandalism an element in content may leak, perhaps covering the entire viewport. Transparent layer preferred. Then interface links cannot be accessed any longer.
 * I was astonished to find apparently [ a quarter million] of articles with top right corner  only (multiple attempts depending on server load gave >260,000 matches).
 * They might result from early insertions like this one at year 1 before the mobile era.
 * It might be an idea to arrange a box at page bottom with explanation, data, map links.
 * An indicator icon might replace data in top right corner and link to the box at page bottom, or any other place (infobox) where geo is available for this parcular page.
 * According to WP:ORDER page coordinates are to be written at page bottom already.
 * However, there is no warranty that all authors transcluded exactly there. Some bot runs and dump analysis is to be taken before a transclusion can be turned into  and a box is drawn around. In the long run the   option and the entire   parameter could be obsoleted. However, as you wrote in 2016: will show up in unexpected places inside articles, because people never figured the template would show any content
 * You may put this issue on appropriate rails. It’s not my business, but you might trigger a maintenance operation.

Structured data across Wikimedia is starting!
Hello there, TheDJ! I am writing to you because a new WMF project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW), is about to start.

SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet.

The reason why I am contacting you is because of your work across the Wikimedia projects, and your opinion would be of great interest for us to kickstart the discussion. We defined a series of questions we would like to have feedback on. If you want to ask a question on your own, or just want to share with us your ideas or opinions, please feel free to do so!

Also, if you know some other user(s) that can be interested, please let me know or invite them to join the discussion. The more, the better!

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk) 14:56, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

erwin85.toolforge.org
Die Tools unter https://erwin85.toolforge.org/ funktionieren nicht mehr. Kannst du als Maintainer eingreifen? Gruß --FriedhelmW (talk) 15:53, 23 March 2021 (UTC)


 * @FriedhelmW I'll try to take a look, but that thing is soooo old.. it seems there has been a php update and I don't think I'll feel like rewriting all the mysql calls to make this ancient tool work again.. What about it do you miss, because almost all of its functionality is also provided by other tools —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 16:16, 23 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the answer. Could you have a look at T268122? --FriedhelmW (talk) 16:23, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

WikiLoop 2020 Year in Review
Dear editors, developers and friends:

Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.

Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.

Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!

María Cruz MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

timecorrection
Hi TheDJ, just to confirm, am I right that your patch https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/mediawiki/core/+/679959 now causes  to hold the current UTC offset (and not the UTC offset at the time of changing the preference)? – SD0001  (talk) 10:26, 19 May 2021 (UTC)


 * yup ;) —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 19:50, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok, can you also give me a sanity check on this: now it's possible to arbitrarily format dates in JS per user timezone, and the only bug that arises would be a 1-hour error when we're talking about an event on the other side of the DST switchover. Right? (Apologies if that's obviously correct or obviously wrong, but i live in a DST-free country so I'm not used to thinking about this :)) – SD0001  (talk) 18:21, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * That seems like a correct representation to me. The preferred way would still be to take the full timezone identifier and apply that to the date you want to show, to avoid the other problem as well. —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 14:45, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Cosmetic problem with WP banners
For what it's worth, there's a minor cosmetic problem with your "responsiveContent" script and WikiProject Banners which I've described at Template talk:WPBannerMeta. I'm not really expecting a solution, just letting you know. --  Dr Greg  talk 22:17, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Gadget "watchlist notice"
Hello, I pinged you on MediaWiki talk:Gadget-watchlist-notice-core.js, but then I noticed on your user page you have disabled notifications, hence this message. Regards, Od1n (talk) 08:56, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WPBannerMeta/core/styles.css
Template:WPBannerMeta/core/styles.css has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Q28 remind you that pay more attention to TFD 01:21, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lang titlepart
Template:Lang titlepart has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 00:26, 7 December 2021 (UTC)