User talk:TheDJ/Archive 2

Joe Sanchez page
Hi, I was wondering if you would remove the afd tag on the Joe Sanchez page. I made many changes to the external links and he meets the WP:BIO criteria of notability for Secondary sources. I just added the page yesterday and was not given any opportunity to edit the page before you nominated for deletion. could you move to talk page until the page is edited? -Brentwood

Hi Buddy
Why the article is considered for deletion? I assure the information is wholly correct. --Prashrb 18:06, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

re: ''Hi, I was looking at your most recent changes to, and i highly doubt that the part"This (root template category)", is intended as displaying: "This (root template category)" in the final result. Can you clarify ? --TheDJ (talk • contribs • WikiProject Television) 21:36, 17 March 2007 (UTC)''


 * This will have to do for now. The problem is the name that the name/link which needs 'displayed' along with it's text varies all over hades. Not even my English is that bad MOST of the time.  I've written and tested a utility to test multiple site names a couple of weeks ago (I think on Wikiversity), and that will need be relocated to do this up better. Thanks for the heads up... that was pretty bad. // Fra nkB  16:04, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Hey
Hey TheDJ, I was wondering, would you be interested in joining a new WikiProject, WP:IS NOT WAS? We need some members :P .. Anyway, I'd be fine if you said no :) Illyria05 (Talk • Contributions) 18:35, 18 March 2007 (UTC) Have a nice day!
 * Although I share your point of view, I do not think it's wise to fair into such a WikiProject at this time. I'd like to take active part in this discussion that is currently ongoing, but I don't want to be vulnerable to a potential "campaigning" claim if this gets out of control. --TheDJ (talk • contribs • WikiProject Television) 18:39, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, okay, no problem, I respect your choice :) .. You're the first and only person I've asked so far, but I won't be spamming :D .. Have a nice day! Illyria05 (Talk • Contributions) 18:42, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Why did you remove those checkmarks?
Why did you remove those checkmarks on the top right corner of the Wikipedia policy pages that bring you to Policies and guidelines? I was trying to make those articles better. Masky (Talk |  contribs) 12:05, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Succession Lists
Okay, what I did was went into the internals of the Template:Episode navigation and changed the first two parameters (preceded by, the title of the show) and to match the standards as established by WikiProject Succession Box Standardization. The third one (succeeded by) I modified slightly but kept as an independent script so that it would still say followed by. I think this will work the best. Since I did that on the master template, all sub-templates such as Template:AD navigation are automatically following the same standards. Thanks for the note, anything to standardize this site is good for the site. – Whale y  land  (  Talk  •  Contributions  ) 01:55, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

4400
Exactly. It also does not use a few fields the primary infobox uses, such as images (which are used within the context of the article to comply with the FUC), by variable I mean it is varied from other infoboxes. Matthew 21:32, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Logos
The logos are already loaded into Wikipedia and just shorted down to size. If fair-use is put into effect for use this way, it would have to be for the logos on the pages already used. (ie: CBS logo on the CBS page). - SVRTVDude (Yell - Toil) 01:48, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Being that I actually have the strength to fight you on this one now....I am asking for specific rules on fair-use. Everyone's interpretation of the rules, vague as they are, are just going to lead to back and forth fights like this and articles that are blank of historic images and information because of one editor's interpretation of the fair-use rules.  There can't be an image that is both OK and in violation at the same time. - SVRTVDude (Yell - Toil) 05:13, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * But since it is being used a visual cue on the main page (ie: NBC) and others that have to do with the respective networks, use of them on the network affiliates, some of which are owned and operated (like WABC-TV is owned by ABC) is not too big a stretch. Now, if you were using it like, for the Peter Jennings page, then that could be a violation...yes, he worked for them, but everyone knows that.  I don't think 50px or smaller logos on the affiliates of the respective network, even on the ones that are owned by that network (so there is no violation there) is a violation nor decorative, actually it is innovative and different. - SVRTVDude (Yell - Toil) 05:34, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * OK, so it would even be violation on O&O pages? WABC-TV is owned by ABC, WNBC-TV is owned by NBC, WCBS-TV is owned by CBS....under current rules the respective logos could be added to these pages with no violation, but not to WHSV, WVIR or WDBJ (ABC, NBC, and CBS affiliates respectively).  Does this make sense? - SVRTVDude (Yell - Toil) 05:55, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Nice trying to explain it as if this was a sentence. But....WABC, being a station owned by ABC, and ABC, the owners of the ABC logo, would be allowed to use the ABC logo in the WABC page, since the owners are the same.


 * No matter how you split it though, you can't deny that it is a 50px or less logo that most will more-than-likely overlook or go "wow, that's neat" and move on (and would never bring a lawsuit). I don't know how many new ideas (like this) are instantly reverted by "fair-use", hence my call for specific rules on fair-use, not this vauge crap that any ol' editor can interpret his/her own way. - SVRTVDude (Yell - Toil) 06:12, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * ...and I like I have said about a bazillion times, I would place good money on not one network suing over the use of the logo on Wikipedia, nor in such a small use, as long as credit is given.


 * I run a radio and TV news website. I use station logos all the time, with no problems.  I put in tiny letters, logo property of WXXX or whatever.  I also have a page that says that "all logos for radio stations, TV stations, etc are property of those stations and used by SVRTV (my site) for information purposes.  SVRTV is not affiliated with these stations."  Never asked permission to use them in the first place and never have had a single problem nor a single request to remove them.  Never been sued either.....so I kinda doubt ABC, CBS, etc are going to come after Wikipedia for using tiny logos like this Image:CBSeye.svg.


 * So, as long as it is being used in the station infoboxes and used properly, I see no problems. If Wikipedia is asked to remove them from the infoboxes, then you do so, til then, we should use them as a "visual cue" as you called it on the infoboxes....you have to admit, it does look cool. - SVRTVDude (Yell - Toil) 06:37, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Template:TVep
Martinp23 and I worked at it for some time but couldn't seem to get the delayed substitution to work (we had it *closer* using ), but still never got it perfect. Could you pop over to Template:TVep and give it a shot? Otherwise, we'll have to replace approx. 300 instances by hand, which will take *quite* awhile. Thanks. ^ demon [omg plz] 01:56, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, just drop me a note if/when you've got it working so I can set my bot to work on it. Many thanks, ^ demon [omg plz] 02:02, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Still doesn't work. It outputs the right text in read mode, but still puts a good portion of the function straight into the article. I'm beginning to think this template is un-substitute-able. ^ demon [omg plz] 07:33, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

A heads up on Mmbabies
When reversing anything, especially articles that have to do with Houston television, look at the data VERY CAREFULLY -- a banned user named "Mmbabies" has been using lots of IPs to change the information as he sees fit. For example, the page for KHCW, which you have reverted due to fair-use image abuse, was reverted to an earlier revision that had the CW on channel 14 (which is actually KETH) You can see his rap sheet at User talk:Mmbabies. -- azumanga 12:35, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

RE: American Dad!
While not my most eloquent contribution, I've added a section on the headlines used in the American Dad! opening. You can link to this subsection American_Dad!. I've also made a similar edit to Futurama at Futurama. Hoof Hearted 19:21, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Never mind, I took care of it. Hoof Hearted 18:06, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Article assessments
Thanks for your kind note on my talk page. The positive feedback is really important when faced with such a large task. I'd like to say thank you to your for all the work you've done re-energising the project, I've been editing lightly for a few months and it was refreshing to come back and see some activity at WP:TV. Your technical knowledge seems well in advance of mine so I might come by and bug you for help with templates in the future! Thanks again and:

The Original Barnstar

Thanks
I wanted to tell you thanks for participating in the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Use of international wheelchair symbol. Feel free to add anything else you'd like to say on the issue. —Remember the dot (talk) 02:39, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Template:Television
Hey, sorry, I was in the middle of several edits, and it looked like you jumped in. Did not mean any sort of edit war or dispute. I had previously tried num_seasons and it didn't work, which is why I reverted to num_series, since that always worked. Just trying to document only what actually works now. --Lexein 14:58, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Wikimedia logo
Organizational logos used on the article about the organization themselves are an acceptable form of use of unfree images; see logo. If you really feel compelled to see this listed on the image page, you're more than welcome to add a note to that effect.

On an largely unrelated note, if you should ever in the future actually wish to remove an image from an article (as opposed to merely raising trouble to try to make a point), please remember to remove the caption as well as the image. Thanks, --RobthTalk 11:43, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I have added a brief rationale to the image. Low resolution is something we do to ensure that we are not diminishing the value of someone else's image by providing a high-res copy that could replace the original, which is not a concern here. I suggest that you not remove the image from the article again. --RobthTalk 13:10, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Edit warring
Please do not edit war with your fellow Wikipedians, especially over an issue as stupid as the foundation's own logo. Such actions are grounds for a block. Show more cooperation and discussions, and do not attempt to be WP:POINT about it. You should know better than to do this, I would think. —Pilot guy cleared for takeoff  13:35, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for fixing up Template:Little Einsteins episode -- I was having a hard time with the template, and just gave up. Templates are not my strong point. Thanks! - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 23:27, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Inés
The aunt and presumed godmother's name is spelled Inés and they've already corrected the spelling of the middle name once from Inez to Ines. I think by the end of the day they will correct it again to Inés, the correct Spanish version of the name. But do what you want.--Bookworm857158367 11:42, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Template:Infobox rocket
I think you may have broken this template. See Space Shuttle, Ariane 5. - 66.93.200.116 13:31, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

sorry
I weren't cross at you I was cross at someone else anyway sorry about that. Dyou think we'd be better off with screenshots on the pages?

Help please!
I moved all of the 30 Rock articles you requested and bit off more than I can chew right now with the dabbing. I already did the main article (30 Rock) and that took, well, quite some time. There's no pressing urgency because all the old names are still blue-linked through redirects. In the hope that you are willing to help, I am posting below the dabbing links.

Special:whatlinkshere/The C Word

Special:whatlinkshere/Jack the Writer

Special:whatlinkshere/Jack-tor

Special:whatlinkshere/Jack Meets Dennis

Special:whatlinkshere/The Baby Show

Special:whatlinkshere/The Rural Juror

Special:whatlinkshere/The Head and the Hair

Thanks.--Fuhghettaboutit 00:32, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

not so much
seems to have taken exception:,. —  pd_THOR  undefined | 14:25, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Matanca.jpg
Howdy! I removed the DB tag from Image:Matanca.jpg because 'Wikipedia is not flikr' is not a criteria for speedy deletion. There are other tools you can use to suggest the deletion of the file, just not that. Thanks! - C HAIRBOY (☎) 14:39, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Sanchez Edits
please let me know what I can do to help remove your fears about my bias. I am just looking to improve the page. I made suggestions and they were ignored so the page was deleted. Is that not protocol? Please let me know how I can improve my editing. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Typewriter (talk • contribs) 00:43, 25 April 2007 (UTC).

commentReponse to your comments on my talk page.

"You cannot. your (relative short) edit history shows that 90% of your edits were to Sarah Robbins"

Correct. As I have admitted I maintain her page.

"or to articles about fellow Ball State University staffers and digital media related articles that are closely related to the courses taught by these staffers."

As mentioned in the there is a Central Indiana focus to the article but the NYT article and USAToday articles mention her in the same article as Harvard and other schools.

"Also I find it awfully coincidental that User:Intellagirl, which apparently is the "official" username of Sarah Robbins, just happens to pop in during the 2 weeks in which you basically write her entire article, just to supply a photo. This reeks as you being either a sockpuppet account, or you being closely related with the subject of the article."

I am very closely related to her but have tried to create a biography article that meets notability and template requirements.

"As such I think all your edits deserve a thorough review for accurateness."

Again please do. I want to increase the quality of wikipedia.

Also if t Sanchez article is improved i have no problem with it remaining.

You may be interested the following edits though: 01:22, 10 March 2007 24.155.108.14 on Sarah's page and edits the same anonymous user made on the original Sanchez page.

KUMBALA VS KUMBALA
HAI, WELL,I RESIDE IN KUMBALA.IN THAT ARTICLE KUMBLE,MANY THINGS ARE WRITTEN WRONG;FOR INSTANCE IT IS WRITTEN THAT KUMBALA IS A SMALL TOWN BORDERING KARNATAKA.THIS IS ABSOLUTELY WRONG,AFTER ALL KUMBALA IS SOME 30 KM SOUTH OF KERALA-KARNATAKA BORDER.ALSO IN KERALA ,KUMBALA IS WRITTEN IN THIS WAY.PLACES IN KERALA SHOULD BE WRITTEN IN THE FASHION KERALITES CALL IT.ALSO THERE WAS NO TONS OF INFORMATION IN THAT ARTICLE.


 * )-ARUNKUMAR P.R

Wikifrenzy
Howdy. I and a few other users left messages on his talk page a few minutes after he started, when he was just starting on the SP introductions. I also stated that I would be reverting his edits, but he's ignored it so far and has continued. Short of threatening him further with a block I don't know what we can do here.

I do apologize if it's buggering up the history, but I'd like to point out that T-dot and SpikeJones have also been reverting his edits. I think it's inevitable that all of them will be reverted back eventually.

Also I checked most of his edits before modifying them ... all of the ones I saw were just pointless edits to numbers instead of the correct season/episode numbers. If there were legit edits I apologize for that as well, but I didn't see any before pulling the trigger. For what it's worth I'll stay out of reverting on the SP articles (assuming that's what you're talking about). Daggoth | Talk 13:59, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

wp:aiv reporting
Hey, TheDJ. When someone vandalizes one more time within one minute or two after a final warning, don't report that yet. They wre probably in the middle of their edit and they hadn't gotten the orange bar yet; it's essentially an edit conflict. If they vandalize yet again after that one time, or if the next vandalism comes like five minutes later, then go ahead and report. — coe l acan — 21:01, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

SPCK Committee
If you'll excuse the pun, this isn't the finished article. I'd appreciate the removal of your CfSD tag in the meantime, as I'm addressing your point vis-a-vis notability. Perhaps I would be better putting the information on my own site. All you get is agro on wikipedia. Orthorhombic 16:12, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

The wonderful thing about the internet used to be the egalitarian nature of the thing. Wikipedia was an ideal example. As your admin supervisor above wrote, you need to give people more time before deleting their work. Orthorhombic 16:32, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

is it just me...
... or has Wikipedia gone to pot and screwed up? I'm considering filing an arbitration case over this to be honest, for the little it's worth. Matthew 23:36, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The thing is: I don't believe the EDP agrees with them. Then there is the fact that the removal was a sneaky coordinated "attack", had this been another time of the year when people where online... meh, I've recently become more involved with TV.com, perhaps I'll move there for a few weeks (my level doubled from 7 to 14 yesterday apparently :-P). Matthew 23:58, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Sailor Mouth
I reported the IP who kept readding the cultural references section and the trivia section to WP:ANI this morning. Squirepants101 00:10, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Sailor Mouth
I guess, since you said tv.com, you must not know the difference between "Com" & "Tome". - Super48 20:40, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Episode list template
My edits were intended to be very minor, mostly to make the code more readable. Unfortunately I missed the ifeq: hack for undefined variables, which caused the layout problems. ed g2s &bull; talk 20:48, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Well pretty much every template with ParserFunctions has that warning, so if you are using an rare hack then it should probably be documented, so the same thing doesn't happen again. Thanks, ed g2s &bull; talk 20:56, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:217 heads with flag.gif
Hello, TheDJ. An automated process has found and removed a fair use image used in your userspace. The image (Image:217 heads with flag.gif) was found at the following location: User:TheDJ/Sandbox. This image was removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image was replaced with Image:Example.jpg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image to replace it with. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 00:03, 7 May 2007 (UTC)