User talk:TheDanaM

Hello, TheDanaM. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Dana M. Haggard (album), you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Jinkinson  talk to me  02:32, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Dana M. Haggard for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dana M. Haggard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dana M. Haggard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:49, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Dana M. Haggard. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Just an FYI: I also nominated the songs and discography for deletion under the same entry. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:57, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Dana M. Haggard. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. ... disco spinster   talk  04:07, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Look Over Me (Dana M Haggard song)


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Look Over Me (Dana M Haggard song). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Look Over Me (Dana M. Haggard song). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Look Over Me (Dana M. Haggard song) – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:07, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Look Over Me (Dana M Haggard song)


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Look Over Me (Dana M Haggard song). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Look Over Me (Dana M. Haggard song). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Look Over Me (Dana M. Haggard song) – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:59, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Joyful Season (Dana M Haggard song)


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Joyful Season (Dana M Haggard song). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Joyful Season (Dana M. Haggard song). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Joyful Season (Dana M. Haggard song) – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:59, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at Look Over Me (Dana M Haggard song), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Please stop using wikipedia to appear to promote your songs. You are free to join in the AfD discussion, but creating pages new without periods after your middle initial to get around an AfD discussion will not prevent it from going forward.'' TonyBallioni (talk) 05:02, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove a file deletion tag from the file description page of a Wikipedia file without resolving the problem that the tag refers to, as you did at Dana M. Haggard, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Please stop removing AfD banners and recreating pages after CSD if those pages already exist. The last AfD banner was removed before I gave a final warning, but again, if you want to discuss this, please go to the AfD page.'' TonyBallioni (talk) 05:07, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Dana M. Haggard (album) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dana M. Haggard (album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dana M. Haggard (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jinkinson  talk to me  21:29, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

ANI report
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:48, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about User:TheDanaM
Hello TheDanaM,

I wanted to let you know that I just nominated User:TheDanaM for deletion, because I don't feel that it's appropriate for Wikipedia. You can participate in this deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TheDanaM. If you would like to edit User:TheDanaM according to the feedback in the discussion, you're welcome to do so (but please don't remove the deletion tag from the top of the page). Skamecrazy123 (talk) 01:03, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Secret account 01:59, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello =)
I just want to say that when you are unblocked that I hope you can become a great editor here improving articles that need help and additions to. Wikipedia is a great place to show how great of a singer you are but only if you are featured in reliable news media. Even if say I were to re-create the articles you made they would most likely be deleted for not having these sources attributed to you. When you do get picked up by the media and sources to back up your claims think of re-creating your pages then. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 22:10, 17 November 2013 (UTC)