User talk:TheDarkKnight180

Removal of chart and link on three pages
On the Elastic Heart Wikipedia page you removed the Australian chart. There is a link provided that states that the song peaked at number 67 on the ARIA Charts. There was a note that clearly stated not to remove the chart. There is a link provided that says that it charted at number 67. There is no need to remove it. The link states this: 'No.67 ELASTIC HEART – Sia Feat. The Weeknd & Diplo. Whilst Sia has been a feature artist on hits like David Guetta’s Titanium (No.5 Sep. ’11) and She Wolf (No.11 Sep. ’12), her new single Elastic Heart marks the first Top 100 single as a primary artist since Bring Night (No.99 Nov. ’10). The track is the second single taken from The Hunger Games: Catching Fire soundtrack following Coldplay’s Atlas (No.30 Sep. ’13).' You also removed a chart with a similar link on another page. PDFs are perfectly fine as long as they actually give right information. You removed another two charts on the page, Changed the Way You Kiss Me. They had links that provided evidence. Why did you remove the AUSTRALIAN charts and their links?(124.181.209.130 (talk) 03:04, 30 November 2013 (UTC))

Re: Removal of chart and link on three pages
As for Elastic Heart, the Australian Recording Industry Association (ARIA) officially only recognises songs that chart within the Top 50. If you head to their website, you will find that they only classify the Top 50 best-selling singles of that particular week, and as Elastic Haert reached No. 67, it is not officially recognised as a part of the Top 50, NOT Top 100. If it reaches No. 50 or higher, I will leave it up there, but as it did not, it didn't formally chart in terms of official charts. A helpful resource you can check out is australian-charts.com which tells you what songs charted in the Top 50 and when, and Elastic Heart is not shown to have charted yet. That is my reasoning.--TheDarkKnight180 (talk) 04:40, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The ARIA Charts only issue the Top 50 to the public and the complete Top 500 to the media such as magazines for reporting to the public. On their website there is a section called Chartifacts which they discuss songs and albums that made it into the Top 100. The ARIA Charts refer to the Top 100 selling singles of a single week unlike New Zealand which only ranks the Top 40. If that is your reasoning are you going to remove all the Canadian charts? The Canadian Billboard Charts only rank the Top 50 on their website but they are a chart that actually ranks the Top 100 songs of a single week of singles sales. Even if the songs didn't make the Top 50 and they made it below they still count. The songs charted within the Top 500 and that is what the ARIA Chart ranks, even if they only issue the Top 50 to the public. That is why they publish the Chartifacts. As for the australian-charts.com they rank songs that charted within the Top 50 only because they are a public website.  The ARIA Singles Chart is a Top 500 Singles ranking chart. (121.220.118.206 (talk) 07:16, 30 November 2013 (UTC))

December 2013
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to You Used to Hold Me, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.  Snap Snap  16:31, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm GSK. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Avatar (2009 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GSK ✉ ✓ 08:11, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at You Used to Hold Me, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.  Snap Snap  02:28, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

March 2014
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Calvin Harris discography, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.  Snap Snap  18:34, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Selfie (song), you may be blocked from editing. — Indian: BIO  · [ ChitChat ] 02:36, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Summer (Calvin Harris song), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Please be sure there is a source that verifies the change referenced in the article and update the access date of the source with the date you looked up the info. I hope you feel you can do that for the betterment of the encyclopedia. -- Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 05:02, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Bound 2, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. STATic message me!   20:45, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Removal of Charts (Nirvana and Foo Fighters)
Right. The Top 100 of the ARIA Charts are official charts. They are published in the ARIA report that is made public. Also in Record charts it says that it is acceptable to use this source therefore I will report you to an admin for vandalism if you do it again.QuintusPetillius (talk) 12:36, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Removal of charts on Sia Discography
Why have you started doing this again! It was clearly stated in late 2013 that it is acceptable. Stop removing the charts, you have been told now many times, so stop doing it! (124.176.172.128 (talk) 08:07, 16 May 2014 (UTC))

May 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=610744624 your edit] to List of number-one singles from the 2010s (New Zealand) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:15, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Clean Bandit New Eyes.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Clean Bandit New Eyes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:37, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Greg Miller.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Greg Miller.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January ( talk ) 06:55, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Deadmau5 - while (12).jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Deadmau5 - while (12).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:27, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Now That's What I Call Music 42 (N.Z. series)


The article Now That's What I Call Music 42 (N.Z. series) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable album. No evidence of awards, charting or in depth coverage in independent reliable sources. No reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:11, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Your addition to Girl Meets World has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Episode summaries must be in your own words, even if there is a cited reference MPFitz1968 (talk) 08:10, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Calvin Harris - Motion.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Calvin Harris - Motion.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:02, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Assimlation as "American" of people of other nationalities.
Please review WP:OPENPARA. When we describe people's nationality, we use the nationality held at the time they became notable. We generally use a single nationality in the lead sentence. In particular, the use of xxx-born is prohibited by WP:OPENPARA. In addition, if a person is born as a national of another country, then even if they became notable after acquiring a new citizenship, then the article must report their naturalization along with citation of support it. This is not the case for M. Night Shyamalan. He must be described as Indian in both the lead sentence and the categories until such time as it is shown that he is a naturalized American citizen and did not become notable until after naturalization. Thank you. Skyerise (talk) 15:58, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

September 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Bastille discography, you may be blocked from editing. I have reverted you countless times in the past two or so years whenever you have added new New Zealand peaks to articles because you do not provide a link to the new peak. You still do not seem to understand charts.org.nz does not update at the same time as nztop40.co.nz. Considering nztop40.co.nz has just updated, you need to link to the URL of it or you will continue to be warned. This has gone on long enough. Learn to source your edits or you may be blocked.  Ss 112  05:34, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Hailee Steinfeld, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — ATS &#128406;  talk  08:27, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Tommy Wiseau - The Disaster Artist premiere SXSW.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Tommy Wiseau - The Disaster Artist premiere SXSW.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 19:31, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Eminem Revival.png
Thanks for uploading File:Eminem Revival.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

March 2018
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at 90th Academy Awards, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Acroterion   (talk)   03:42, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Greg Miller (Internet celebrity)
Hello, TheDarkKnight180,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Greg Miller (Internet celebrity) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Greg Miller (Internet celebrity) (2nd nomination).

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:15, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Bangers and Ballads.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:05, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bangers and Ballads.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bangers and Ballads.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Lewis Capaldi 2019.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Lewis Capaldi 2019.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the Non-free fair use tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:59, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Someone You Loved. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 'Are you still'' at this years later? You literally learned NOTHING from all the warnings given to you years ago. Keep it up and you will be reported.  Ss  112  ''' 05:10, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Gmail and the Restraining Orders a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Gmail and the Restraining Orders. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 18:00, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

December 2022
Hello, I'm Ss112. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, This Is What I Mean, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Ss  112   22:47, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)