User talk:TheDeadRat

Speedy deletion nomination of James Casey (Actor)


A tag has been placed on James Casey (Actor) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ubelowme U Me  18:49, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

I was struggling for references, I was sure there was newspaper articles about his performance but I cant find them. Its probably best it goes for just now.--TheDeadRat (talk) 19:08, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of James Casey (Actor) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Casey (Actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/James Casey (Actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ubelowme U Me  19:23, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

In Search of La Che
Could you possibly stop trying to add this to the article? If anything it belongs at the Cultural depictions of Margaret Thatcher article, but it is definitely not for the main article. --John (talk) 21:24, 11 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Sorry Mate, thought with CNN now reporting on it, it was worthy of being on the main page. TheDeadRat (talk) 23:26, 11 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Where were CNN reporting on it? --John (talk) 23:31, 11 April 2013 (UTC)


 * In this article its the 2nd picture in http://edition.cnn.com/2013/04/10/opinion/lynn-yes-prime-minister-thatcher TheDeadRat (talk) 16:46, 12 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Sorry should point out kinda new to wikipedia and not too sure what constitutes a reliable source but i thought CNN would qualify TheDeadRat (talk) 16:48, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Glasgow Filmmakers Alliance
Hello TheDeadRat,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Glasgow Filmmakers Alliance for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:13, 19 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi, what kind of information would be required to keep the page going? TheDeadRat (talk) 00:36, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andrew O'Donnell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scottish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chris Quick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your connection to Lynn Murray
In Articles for deletion/Lynn Murray you mention the actress in question has been in touch, but whatever contact there has been it doesn't appear to have been onwiki. What's your connection to Murray? – Teratix ₵ 04:09, 29 February 2024 (UTC)