User talk:TheDragonFire300/Archive 1

Welcome!
Hello, TheDragonFire300, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 11:45, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Uno (bus company) page
I don't see why the pronuciation is not needed on Uno's page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.224.39.227 (talk) 10:27, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The thing is, it's in the wrong place. It should be somewhere else, not in the middle of the article. I know, prove me wrong, but this is my opinion. No other article has a pronunciation guide in the middle of the article. It could be useful, but in the place it was in your edit, it is totally unnecessary. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me &#124; Contributions). This message was left at 23:19, 1 August 2017 (UTC) P.S, you should sign your reply.

Self-trout
You have been trouted for: faling to read the policies for reporting a user to the administrators. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me &#124; Contributions). This message was left at 10:14, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

the dragonfire300
who are you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.50.182.227 (talk) 07:11, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 * One of the many editors patrolling the recent changes page and rolling back/undoing any bad faith edits, as yours was. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me &#124; Contributions). This message was left at 07:14, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 * By the way, another one of your edits was reverted.

Macquarie Park edit
Hi, I recently tried to edit the Macquarie Park Aboriginal Culture section What I was trying to do was remove the sentence "Their descendants live on, though their language, social system, way of life and traditions are mostly lost." My wife has aboriginal heritage and she objects to that statement. Seems I deleted more than that. Please forgive me. NorthRyder (talk) 21:38, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Of course, you're forgiven if it was an error. Next time though, use the sandbox (either Wikipedia's or your own). But before you go... check your talk page. There's a surprise for you. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me &#124; Contributions). This message was left at 04:47, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Whack! Ouch! But thanks for the chips! NorthRyder (talk) 01:44, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

I HAVEN'T REMOVED ANYTHING!!!
I HAVEN'T REMOVED ANYTHING, WHEN I GOT THROUGH EVERYTHING WAS STILL ON THE PAGE, I HAD JUST ADDED A NEW LINK, COMPLETELY RELEVANT TO THE SHOW!!! To a Cartoon Network Fan-site Page Dedicated to the show pertaining to a Fan-Made Soundtrack to the show, since the creator never made one, how am I supposed to get the word out there if you keep removing it, I didn't remove anything, all the original info was still there!!! I even tried to put it at the very bottom of the page and you still claimed that I was removing info. I will make one more edit to the Codename: Kids Next Door Page adding the link back, with photo evidence this time. Contact me at:. Peace!

69.40.23.166 (talk) 14:05, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Explain this. Warning still stands. You have a point though; I did roll back the wrong version... Also, I rolled back only ONE revision. If you want to blame someone for removing your content, blame the right person. I didn't remove any content past what you blanked out. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me &#124; Contributions). This message was left at 01:57, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also: TonyBallioni (talk) 22:55, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

M. Vulcănescu
Hello!

I noticed for a fact that M. Vulcănescu page in English shares information out of the context and so very incomplete on who really was this figure. It skipped so many important parts of his life aspects and work that I find it insulting to the memory of this great personality. So that is why I left a link towards the Romanian version, the one that shares a much more appropriate light, giving details beyond the political figure (even that one being so distorted in english version). So please take into consideration that this english page for M. Vulcănescu might throw a lot of discrimination on the figure of a man who fought communism and died almost as a saint giving his life for others.

best regards

188.25.152.0 (talk) 10:11, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 * However, it is inappropriate for many readers. If you have something to fix, then be bold and fix it yourself. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me &#124; Contributions). This message was left at 11:04, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Trouted
You have been trouted for: Revrting a page that was merged 94.99.230.177 (talk) 10:54, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * You edit-warred with other users. Seek consensus. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me &#124; Contributions). This message was left at 10:55, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * We decided to merge but other users edit warring 94.99.230.177 (talk) 10:58, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I have only revete reverted another edit of yours. Also, don't blame me for edit-warring when you've done so as well (see WP:PETARD). Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me &#124; Contributions). This message was left at 11:04, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

User Warnings
It would be well advised to allow a person reverting an edit time on their own to notify the reverted user. Thanks for your help with RC patrol! -- Dolotta (talk) 01:58, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
 * You're probably talking about this warning. If so, I did try to revert it myself, but you beat me, even though Twinkle opened up the talk page anyway. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me &#124; Contributions). This message was left at 02:26, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't doubt it. It just makes it look like I have a bad memory and forgot to notify the person I reverted. I'm sure my wonderful spouse would agree with the memory part (smile). -- Dolotta (talk) 02:45, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Rollback
Have you considered asking for Rollback? I think you would certainly qualify and it comes in useful -- especially on the Special:RecentChanges page. It makes it easier to know which edits on the page are current. I'll certainly vouch for you! -- Dolotta (talk) 02:45, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I could. Someone had it denied because Twinkle was good enough, but I think I'm a different story... It also lets me use Huggle, which seems to be faster than the old RecentChanges -> View Diff -> Twinkle revert -> Warn process. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me &#124; Contributions). This message was left at 05:25, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi TheDragonFire300. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ATheDragonFire300 enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 12:36, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.
 * Congrats DragonFire! Use it well! -- Dolotta (talk) 13:42, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Image-bacteria-eat-plastic-590x433.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Image-bacteria-eat-plastic-590x433.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi TheDragonFire300! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 12:15, Wednesday, March 29, 2017 (UTC)

Response to the "critical reception" of "Revival"
Hello TheDragonFire300.

It was never my intent to say that the critics were wrong, my main intent was to have the viewers of the article understand that not every single review of this album was mixed, as many reviewers had many conflicting opinions about the album, thus, me wanting to add that the album's reception was "polarized", as nobody could seem to agree on what parts of the album were good, bad, or in between.

Anythingworx23 (talk) 02:59, 7 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Alright then, I apologise for the misunderstanding. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me &#124; Contributions). This message was left at 05:15, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
Hi TheDragonFire300,

I think you criticized the wrong individual regarding the edit of Conventional weapon. My edit was a border-line minor change and I would be surprised if it ruffled any feathers. Also, I don't think you reverted it.

Clinton.tepper (talk) 21:35, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
 * The warning has been struck, and the right user has been warned. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me &#124; Contributions). This message was left at 21:58, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

User MrLuke485
Your comment on the incident board ignored the abusive messages this user has been posting, which now include trying to link me with other editors of whom I have no knowledge whatsoever. This editor addresses other editors as "Dear Random Troll". That is abuse. Trying to link editors randomly to other editors is also abusive. Therefore, the incident is in the right place. As far as the content of the article goes, I saw the programmes being discussed. MrLuke485 has publicly admitted they did not, nor were they even born when they were shown.50.254.136.250 (talk) 22:35, 6 October 2018 (UTC)


 * I can confirm that, but what 50.254.136.250 is neglecting to mention is that they have no reliable source either to say that Terry Wogan did host the preview show in 1975 and we would very interested to see where they got his information from. To judge a book as fan based is a bit of judgement call. The author, Mr. Roxburgh did state that he collected the information through individual who remembered it well, including staff at the BBC and even credits them for the information. I do feel that when I try, people do not give me the chance to explain my information and then poke fun at me for my misuse of grammar. Yes the Burnett one is ludicrous, but that has been on Wikipedia for aslong as three years, why wasn’t it sorted out before then. I do try and find as much relevant information, it didn’t help when you confronted me on the talk page. I am not a troll, I take my Eurovision work very seriously, I have done for the past seven years, to allow this user to call me abusive is absurd and irritating. Mrluke485 (talk) 22:47, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

And this above comment ignores the fact the ANI post was about a content dispute, not a user conduct issue. Furthermore, you,, broke Wikipedia's rule against personal attacks in your original report, with quotes such as MrLuke485 falls way short of the wiki guidelines, plus, they are now in violation of the 3RR rule and seem intent on making their edit which makes the article incorrect., which accuses them of being short of the guidelines without any consideration for your edits, suggesting a boomerang report against you. Please sort out your issues on the article talk page (not here), or at the dispute resolution noticeboard. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me &#124; Contributions). This message was left at 22:51, 6 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Addressing me as "Dear Random Troll" is personal abuse and falls way short of wikipedia's guidelines. I was thus right to point that out. Issuing a warning that they are in breach of the 3RR rule is not abusive. It is a fact. They are. Naming me as some random editor I've never encountered or ever heard of is abuse. Stating that addressing editors as "Dear Random Troll" is not abuse and thus being called out for this abuse is "absurd and irritating" is as ludicrous as it is absurd and irritating. I could not care less if articles on this site are incorrect. If it's so important to MrLuke to insist a programme he has never seen and was broadcast before he was born is incorrectly identified in an online encyclopedia, then good luck to him. The reality is, the book he is quoting is vanity published by a fan. Self publishing is called vanity publishing for a reason. I do care about being abused and being accused of things that have nothing to do with me. I suspect it's pretty clear the editor MrLuke485 is a sock puppet for TVArchivist, who apparently has been blocked from the site. It makes total sense now.50.254.136.250 (talk) 23:01, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm not going to comment further on this dispute. Please do not use this talk page as a vehicle to promote your dispute. And you are not automatically right on this site. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me &#124; Contributions). This message was left at 04:10, 7 October 2018 (UTC)