User talk:TheDude1010

May 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Nathan Cody has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bmyspace\.com (links: http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendid=104745465&blogid=197860347). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:34, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. One or more of the external links you added in this edit to the page Nathan Cody do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. You may wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 21:01, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in this edit to Nathan Cody. Inappropriate links include links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that serve as advertising or promotion. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 21:10, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to Nathan Cody. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Eugene Krabs (talk) 21:12, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to Nathan Cody. Eugene Krabs (talk) 21:39, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Asd park full.jpg needs authorship information.
Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Asd park full.jpg is missing information as to it's authorship, or if such information is provided it is confusing.

If possible, please add or clarify this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

When adding authorship information to self published work please do NOT use describers such as 'I made this', 'own-work', 'self-made' or personal names, without making your user name explicit.

This is so that media can be more accurately traced, if it is transferred to Wikimedia Commons.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:10, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Asd utb.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:19, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

The wrong Maury?
I just got your email, but I think you have the wrong Maury. I have not worked on that page, but I see AMaury has. Maury Markowitz (talk) 14:45, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Asd utb.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Asd utb.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 03:15, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Another Single Day for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Another Single Day is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Another Single Day until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Whpq (talk) 14:39, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Nathan Cody at work.jpg


The file File:Nathan Cody at work.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused personal file, not encyclopedic, out of project scope."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Matr1x-101 (Ping me when replying) { user page (@ commons) - talk }  10:23, 17 September 2023 (UTC)