User talk:TheEarthLove

STOP
stop deleting the image on Miss Universe. Ң Д M M®  (Hun dry Marq uina!) 14:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Miss International Beauty 2009
Have you checked the news before undoing my edit?

http://vietnamnews.vnagency.com.vn/showarticle.php?num=02CUL030809 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.69.45.173 (talk) 11:29, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Miss Earth article section subheadings
Hi Earth Love. Thank you for editing Miss Earth-related articles. You have undone my edits specifically the "section headings" of the Miss Earth article. Please take note that my edits are in accordance to the Manual of Style of Wikipedia. Please see the guidance in the "Article titles, headings, and sections," then proceed to the "section subheadings" in the Manual of Style as a reference. Here's part of the Wikipedia Manual of Style:  "Section names should not normally contain links, especially ones that link only part of the heading; they will cause accessibility problems. Section names should not explicitly refer to the subject of the article, or to higher-level headings, unless doing so is shorter or clearer. For example, Early life is preferable to His early life when His means the subject of the article; headings can be assumed to be about the subject unless otherwise indicated. Capitalize the first letter of the first word and any proper nouns in headings, but leave the rest in lower case. Thus Rules and regulations, not Rules and Regulations.Unspaced multiple equal signs are the style markup for headings. The triple apostrophes (') that make words appear in boldface are not used in headings. The nesting hierarchy for headings is as follows: the automatically generated top-level heading of a page is H1, which gives the article title; primary headings are then ==H2==, followed by ===H3===, ====H4====, and so on. Spaces between the == and the heading text are optional (==H2== versus == H2 ==). These extra spaces will not affect the appearance of the heading, except in the edit window. A blank line below the heading is optional. If there are no blank lines above the heading, one line should be added, for readability in the edit window. Only two or more blank lines above or below will change the public appearance of the page by adding more white space."''

Read also all the Wikipedia rules indicated in your User talk:TheEarthLove as guide in editing. Sometimes, we are vandalizing the article without our knowledge, since our edits are not in accordance with the Wikipedia guidelines. I can say that I'm still in the processs of incorporating all the guidelines into my edits. Please undo your edits in the Miss Earth article pertaining to "section subheadings." One more thing, please don't forget to fill the edit summary because it is considered vandalism if you ignore the edit summary. I would love to collaborate with you more in editing Miss Earth-related articles. Happy Editing!--Richie Campbell (talk) 13:35, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia rule of capitalization
I have reverted your recent edits in the Miss Earth article, since it is considered vandalism. See Wikipedia Manual of Style MOS:CAPS: "Capitalize the first letter of the first word and any proper nouns in headings/sections, but leave the rest in lower case." One of the most common mistakes in most articles in Wikipedia related to beauty pageants (like Miss Universe, Miss World, Miss International, and Miss Earth) is the use of capitalization in article headings, sections, and subsections; if you visit the main page of Wikipedia [Alt-z] you can observe the featured articles to be paralled to my edits. Take note that Wikipedia has its own policy in capitalization. Your edit is a clear violation with the MOS:CAPS, which is considered vandalism if one editor would correct it and someone would undo the correction. Please refer to the MOS:CAPS and let me know your feedback.--Richie Campbell (talk) 14:49, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

August 2009
This is a warning for your disruptive edits. I have already informed and reminded you about the guidelines twice. If you continue to vandalize Miss Earth Wikipedia article, you will be blocked from editing. --Richie Campbell (talk) 14:11, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. --Richie Campbell (talk) 02:20, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia words and phrases to watch for
I have reverted your edit in Miss Earth 2009 with the use of the word prestigious in lined with peacock terms. In Wikipedia articles, forgo unsourced or unexplained peacock terms that merely promote the subject of the article without imparting verifiable information. Examples include describing people or event as "important", "main" or "among the greatest" in their field. Deciding whether a particular wording is suitable on any given occasion is a matter of good editorial judgement. The following is a list of words that are often misused in Wikipedia:


 * acclaimed
 * amazing
 * astonishing
 * authoritative
 * award&#x2011;winning
 * awesome
 * beautiful
 * best
 * brilliant
 * canonical
 * charismatic
 * classic
 * defining and definitive
 * eminent
 * enigma
 * esteemed
 * excellent
 * exciting
 * extraordinary
 * fabulous
 * famous and infamous
 * fantastic
 * fully
 * genius
 * global
 * greatest
 * iconic
 * immensely
 * impactful
 * important


 * impressive
 * incendiary
 * indisputable
 * influential
 * innovative
 * inspirational
 * inspired
 * interesting
 * intriguing
 * leader
 * leading
 * legendary
 * long
 * major
 * masterly
 * mature
 * mediocre
 * memorable
 * notable
 * noted
 * outstanding
 * picturesque
 * pioneer
 * popular
 * premium
 * prestigious
 * primary
 * really good
 * remarkable
 * renowned


 * select(ed)
 * seminal
 * short
 * significant
 * skillful
 * solutions
 * single-handedly
 * staunch
 * successful
 * superior
 * superlative
 * talented
 * the most
 * top
 * transcendent
 * trusted
 * undoubtedly
 * unique
 * virtually
 * virtuoso
 * visionary
 * well-educated
 * well-established
 * well-known
 * well-regarded
 * world-class
 * world-renowned
 * world-famous
 * worst

Please refer to the Wikipedia guidelines pertaining to WP:PEACOCK for more details.--Richie Campbell (talk) 14:03, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)