User talk:TheEdanJT

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saint Francis Xavier's College (October 11)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:TheEdanJT/sandbox/Saint Francis Xavier's College and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:TheEdanJT/sandbox/Saint Francis Xavier's College, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:TheEdanJT/sandbox/Saint_Francis_Xavier%27s_College Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_arndt&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:TheEdanJT/sandbox/Saint_Francis_Xavier%27s_College reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 03:23, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

You're not a reliable source by an encyclopedia's standards
OK, let me try and explain this in a way you might understand. Time (magazine) is an established reliable source, The Newcastle Herald is an established reliable source. By comparison, User:TheEdanJT, is not an established reliable source, User:TheEdanJT is just one person using a computer to edit an encyclopedia (much like myself). You cannot use yourself as a source, regardless of whether you go to the school, graduated from the school, or just know a lot about the school. Please read WP:RS if for some reason you still need further help understanding what a reliable source is and what you can use as a reliable source on Wikipedia.

Any information on Wikipedia that is unreferenced can be challenged and removed, as I have done in this case. If you want to add the information to the article, it is up to you to find a reliable source. I am within my rights to remove the information; you on the other hand are violating Wikipedia's guidelines by re-instating contested unsourced material. Continuing to do this will likely result in your account being blocked from editing. Damien Linnane (talk) 23:59, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Damien Linnane (talk) 03:46, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:06, 20 October 2019 (UTC)