User talk:TheEpicTracks

You are the latest to decline my article for creation Mark A. York. While I keep adding sources that any editor can verify, they choose not to, apparently. Why is anyone's guess? The article's subject, the book Patriot on the Kennebec, is already an approved Wikipedia article so it begs the question of why the author should remain invisible? Notability is subjective. I did not write the sources. They are there in published authors' books crediting my work. That's a fact. Perhaps more experience with literary works and authors is needed here? Marky48 (talk) 14:30, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Quick thing on Nelson Dellis article
Hey TheEpicTracks, thanks so much for reviewing/posting the article for Nelson Dellis. One quick thing, though—it looks like a couple of the categories didn't get set up properly. Because I'm working on behalf of Mr. Dellis, I don't edit articles myself, so if you could fix the categories, I'd sure appreciate it! Cheers, ChrisPond (Talk · COI) 16:59, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ Thanks for taking care of this so quickly; I really appreciate it! Cheers, ChrisPond (Talk · COI) 18:59, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks
quite right too!. --  Cassianto Talk   18:17, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=568806665 your edit] to List of progressive rock bands may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s and 131 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:13, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

The List of Progressive Rock Bands Section.
Good evening, sir/madam. Are you copying and pasting the same text various times on the list of progressive rock bands section? If so, please stop doing that. This is not necessary for a variety of reasons. Thank you. Mr. Brain (talk) 01:19, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Bellerby & Co Globemakers.

Hi there, thank you for looking through my submission on the globemakers, which you decline for lack of reliable sourcing. Can I ask how I should improve this page to allow for its publication? Best wishes, hlhreid

== Bellerby & Co Globemakers. == Hi there, thank you for looking through my submission on the globemakers, which you decline for lack of reliable sourcing. Can I ask how I should improve this page to allow for its publication? I am new to this wikipedia lark so need to learn!

Best wishes, hlhreid — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hlhreid (talk • contribs) 13:09, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Talal Al-Zahrani
I've declined your speedy deletion nomination of this article, since neither of the criteria you cited apply here. WP:A1 is limited to articles where in reading the text you can't figure out who or what the article is supposed to be about. When dealing with biographies, if you have name, date of birth, and claim to notability (valid or not), there is enough context to figure out who the subject is. WP:A7 does not apply since the article makes a claim not only to importance, but to the higher standard of notability. Having played in the Saudi Professional League, Al-Zahrani meets WP:NFOOTBALL. To be fair, with only a small number of appearances, this is an edge case and there is a reasonable argument to be made that article should be deleted, but it's controversial enough that it needs to be discussed first]]. Happy editing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:04, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Biography Photo Epic Tracks.jpg


The file File:Biography Photo Epic Tracks.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused personal photo. Out of scope."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 10:49, 4 February 2022 (UTC)