User talk:TheFarix/Archive 18

Determining air dates
Hi I was wondering how do you determen Naruto Shippuden English air datesE.hoary (talk) 02:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)E.hoary?
 * First and foremost through reliable sources of when episodes aired on a network (not on VoD). However, the episodes you added dates for have never aired in English. The last network that aired new English episodes of Naruto Shippuden was Neon Alley, which stopped at episode 312 on September 26, 2015. —Farix (t &#124; c) 04:01, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

List of D.N.Angel characters
If Anime has its own special assessment for lists then fair enough, I wasn't aware of that. However, you only needed to revert the anime part of my edit, not the whole edit. Thanks. --Jameboy (talk) 10:11, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Following the Plot
I apologize for threatening you just because you said something offensive to me. However, I may be adding original research (I looked for the word "protagonist" or "heroine" on the original research article, but there is none.), but I'm not trying to arbitrary rearranging characters. The reason why I'm rearranging them is because I'm following the plot. Please understand that. Nintenchris5963 (talk) 20:10, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kyojin no Hoshi manga vol 1 reprint.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kyojin no Hoshi manga vol 1 reprint.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Timeslot succession boxes
That succession box for anime that lists the previous and next anime in its TV timeslot. I see these on some anime pages, and I must ask what's the stance on them? It's typical behavior on the Japanese and Chinese Wikipedias, but I am not so sure about it on the English Wikipedia. It's irrelevant to the anime in most cases and in ten years nobody would care that, for example, Aikatsu replaced ZEXAL or VRAINS replaced Twin Star Exorcists. So, should they be on pages or not? --24.158.181.133 (talk) 06:19, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Sword Art Online/GA1
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Sword Art Online/GA1. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:18, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Aladdin (Animated TV series)
Hi my name is E.hoary I love tthe Aladdin animated TV series Eden and her master Dhandi are not voiced by the same voice actress Debi Derryberry witch Dhandi is voiced by, Eden is voiced by Valery Pappas. E.hoary (talk) 02:08, 4 April 2018 (UTC)E.hoary

Hi my name is E.hoary I love tthe Aladdin animated TV series Eden and her master Dhandi are not voiced by the same voice actress Debi Derryberry witch Dhandi is voiced by, Eden is voiced by Valery Pappas. E.hoary (talk) 02:08, 4 April 2018 (UTC)E.hoary — Preceding unsigned comment added by E.hoary (talk • contribs)

Grand Blue
Hello, TheFarix,

Simply out of interest, how does it make sense to you, that genres are listed on the page of Highschool DxD without a citation, but on the Grand Blue page they are removed? An explanation would be welcome. ZeR0101MiNt (talk) 22:05, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Other stuff exists. I cannot police every edit made to Wikipedia relating to anime and manga articles. But what I can do is search for specific unreliable sources and remove them and either replace with a fact tag, or simply remove the statement when the information is either questionable or original research. The source for the genres for Grand Blue was to ANN's encyclopedia section, which is based entirely on user generated content and is therefore an unreliable source. Give that genres are a frequent source of original research, I removed them when I removed the citation to ANN's encyclopedia. —Farix (t &#124; c) 11:57, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

It appears that the genre tag is a little bit tricky if there is no accepted source. Thanks for the explanation. ZeR0101MiNt (talk) 12:39, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Toonami
I included a linked reference that states the change in the schedule. https://twitter.com/ToonamiNews/status/982765857603489794 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.80.103.151 (talk) 23:17, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, I looked at what you wrote on the history page afterwards. Rather than write an entire new section, I thought it'd be more efficient if the schedule change of April 7 was included with the 14th since it's after the moving of Black Clover. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.80.103.151 (talk) 23:23, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Shokugeki no Soma
http://www.crunchyroll.com/videos/anime/genres/ecchi

Crunchyroll lists Ecchi as a genre, and this series is in that category. I think its fairly necessary to find some way to indicate that aspect of this series, because I don't see any mention of it anywhere else in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1702:23B0:F2D0:4C10:F522:BFEB:20F5 (talk) 01:04, 2 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Crunchyroll lists a lot of things as genres that are not. For example, it lists the demographic groups shōnen, shōjo, and mature as genres as well when they are demographic groups. Ecchi as a genre is a fanmade invention in order to lump in anime that contains sexually provocative fanservice and does not describe the actual type of story being told. —Farix (t &#124; c) 13:50, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Codename: Sailor V - The Game
Please, do something with it! This vandal does incorrect actions on this page. Perdon my bad english, I am Turk. Turka al Busavi (talk) 11:29, 7 May 2018 (UTC)


 * I personally question the reliability of the cited source. And the screen rant mention is based on the Wikipedia article, so it would be a circular reference. —Farix (t &#124; c) 11:32, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * No way, Farix. The Wikipedia article's not mentioned. I' ve just copied this word-in-a-word! Turka al Busavi (talk) 11:34, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * It's pretty obvious that it was based on the Wikipedia entry. As for copying it word for word, that makes it a WP:COPYVIO. —Farix (t &#124; c) 11:35, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Farix, no. This is like a... newspaper! Free to distribute. Why not? As a way, why SBerT (user is alrdy mentioned) says that I am blocked here? Wrong criteria for speedy deletion! Turka al Busavi (talk) 11:37, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If you cannot conform to Wikipedia's policies regarding copyright and sourcing, then you will eventually find your editing privileges suspended. —Farix (t &#124; c) 11:40, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * "Text from this website is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 License". Remember it well. 195.170.33.33 (talk) 11:42, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

✅ - IP Blocked by NeilN. Farix, if you want to investigate the matter with the accounts use WP:SPI or WP:AIV or WP:ANI. For an questions with pages ask please NeilN or any another administrator. Turka al Busavi (talk) 14:42, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Tsubasa Oozora statue
Thanks for the answer in the wikiproject. I entered wikicommons and requested for the image here. Is this how it's done? Sorry, I don't have experience when dealing with free images. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 15:48, 9 May 2018 (UTC)


 * I've never initiated a transfer request myself, but I have seen images moved to Commons before. —Farix (t &#124; c) 21:52, 9 May 2018 (UTC)


 * I see. Do you know of any user who might know?Tintor2 (talk) 23:35, 9 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately, I don't. —Farix (t &#124; c) 00:42, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Puppet Show
Hi. I'm not too familiar with Wikipedia's procedures so let me appeal to you directly. Please check the user account Turka al Busavi as it too obviously appears to be a clone of previously banned SBarT, LieH geiS, Tamerlan84, Taller403, and maybe some others I know nothing of. As a related note, the article Codename: Sailor V - The Game should be deleted as obviously created to promote the same nonsense that aforementioned accounts was used for adding across Sailor Moon / Sailor V articles before. --SBerT (talk) 11:48, 7 May 2018 (UTC)


 * If you believe these are sockpuppets of already blocked accounts, file a WP:SPI report on them. I've already reported the IP and to WP:AN3 for edit warring. —Farix (t &#124; c) 11:53, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi again. As you can see, the user Turka al Busavi faked the result message on the Administrators' noticeboard. Where should that be reported? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SBerT (talk • contribs) 09:25, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * You will have to report the allege sock puppet account to WP:SPI. For other behavior issues, report it to WP:AN. —Farix (t &#124; c) 13:28, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * SPI was filed by and resulted in a conformation that  is a sockpuppet. I have also nominated Codename: Sailor V - The Game for deletion (perhaps my longest rational to date). (discussion). And finally, I have formally challenged the ScreenRant article as a clear circular reference. (discussion) Beyond the cleanup, I think we are done here. —Farix (t &#124; c) 21:51, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you! You are very helpful. --SBerT (talk) 22:09, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I'll also note that it was the sock that added you - not me, and I think the CU who ran the check took that into account. :) CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  12:21, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

So you mean?
I can add the kanji and romaji title whenever it's available at the official website but the original air date must be verify? or I can just put TBA on the original air date will that prevent me from getting a warning again? Is that fine? Malerious10 (talk • contribs) 23:14, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If the title of the next was announced on the endcard of the previous episode, that is enough to pass WP:V. However, the next air date cannot be presumed without citing a reliable source. Presuming an air date is a violation of WP:V and WP:CRYSTALBALL. But generally, it is best to not list the air date until after the episode has aired. That is because schedules can change for many reasons, including special programing, breaking news events, or even delays in production. —Farix (t &#124; c) 02:03, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Sorry
I thought that it was possible to use it if I put the original source at it. I'll do it myself now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boyohboy231 (talk • contribs) 03:14, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Subheadings
If you remove a subheading, like you did recently on Twin Star Exorcists and How Not to Summon a Demon Lord, please make sure you fix any links that may have pointed to it, such as volume list links in the infobox. Thanks. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 18:08, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Also, where in the MOS does it say to avoid standalone headings? Because I can't find it at MOS:HEADING.  G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 18:18, 20 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Personally, if the lists are still on the main article, there should not be any links in the infobox. The link should only be created when the lists are on a different page. That is because the Table of Contents is already at the top of the article for navigation. Secondly, avoiding standalone headers or subsections is basic grammar, which are touched on by style guides such as APA. Yes, many people ignore it, but does that mean it is OK to have standalone subheading? Absolutely not. Just like how many people uses it's for the possessive pronoun its does not mean that using it's is correct.
 * Fair enough. But I still think the volume list links are useful, since it's a quick and easy way to check if the volume count in the infobox is correct.  G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 18:39, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Gundam Build Divers
You did nuked everything in the Gundam Build Divers page as of late INCLUDING the episode list. Is that too much just because you did not research it well, or just skipped every single end credits not seeing who voiced who. Not all reliable sources has to come to the official website unless you hate my guts that much. I know what you're gonna say......."blah blah WP:RS WP:OR WP:V blah blah". I don't like that you ruin my experience in this site. Tl:dr: I.HATE.YOU--BlackGaia02 (talkpage if you dare) (talk) 02:37, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * First and foremost, Wikipedia is not a fansite. If having other editors fix problems with articles so that they comply with Wikipeida's polices and guidelines "ruins" your experience, then the problem lies with you and not the editors fixing things. Secondly, I was not the one who removed the episode list form the article. split it and the character section off after I tagged the page with Overly detailed. I did restore the character list by using the official webpage's list. That way it focuses on the principal characters and not every character that appears in the series, regardless of how important they are. Voice roles also fall under WP:BIO. So if they are not sourced, they are automatically removed. —Farix (t &#124; c) 02:49, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Well I don't like how the site is going now concerning anime articles then. So what? Just because academic articles needs to be over complicated and detailed means anime articles needs to be cut off or have some content removed? Is that the reason why this purge is going on? I disagree with this, especially when cutting off things that aren't needed to be cut off! Clearly I'm hating this site from all the bad changes to all anime articles!--BlackGaia02 (talkpage if you dare) (talk) 05:15, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

About Ryoma Baba.
Dear The Farix

Thank you for editing "Ryouma Baba".

I checked his Japanese offcial cite. http://tokientertainment.co.jp/management/ryomababa.html It shows his name is Ryoma Baba.

This Wikipedia should write his actors name.

I think the mistake happened from some Japanese in the TV program wrote his English name with a wrong spell. And then all the spell get wrong in English world. But his Official and Japanese cite shows his actor's name. Ryoma Baba. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Satorudayo (talk • contribs) 05:13, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

About Fujimi Orchestra
Dear The Farix

Thank you for reverting the change of context regarding the sexual encounter between these characters. At cursory glance and from an immature perspective, it might seem like rape, but Morimura is sober and able to defend himself against Tonoin's advances, but doesn't. If anything, he's rather confused about his sexuality. Certainly, he could have spoken up. He's an adult, after all, not a frightened child without power. No violence or retaliation of any kind was threatened at any time by Tonoin and Morimura has never been shy about confronting Tonoin before. I would say the same if the encounter were between a male towards a female or a female towards a male. Fujimi Orchestra is one of my favorite yaoi anime and I was taken aback to see that edit. I was also relieved that someone else agreed that it should be reverted immediately. Thanks again. luxartisan 11:50, 15 June 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ouranista (talk • contribs)


 * The edits appeared to be random vandalism to me. Replacing a character's name with "rapist" will set off red flags that the edits are not genuine. —Farix (t &#124; c) 12:02, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
Hello, I'm Moazam.n25. I just saw your reply on my talk page. I'm terribly sorry about removing information related to volume 15 from Twin Star Exorcists without properly explaining why. I just wanted information regarding the new volume but I couldn't find anything, which led to me deducing it doesn't exist. Next time, I'll be more careful. Thank you so much for your support. —Moazam.n25 (t &#124; c) 13:10, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Change made to the page "Eden's Zero".
Hello, I am Aryan. I recently updated some information on the page "Eden's Zero". The name "Eden's Zero" was not the official name for the upcoming manga by Hiro Mashima. The name was subject to change and the updated, official name for the manga is "Edens Zero". This is the only change I made to the article and I feel it is incorrect to revert the contribution. Thank you. Aryan28829 (talk) 19:31, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * In both reverts, I pointed to the previous discussion on the talk page where it was already decided to keep the name to Eden's Zero pending any new coverage by reliable English-language sources. Because you ignored the discussion after it was pointed out to you, your edits were disruptive. —Farix (t &#124; c) 20:10, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

ANI rollback
Sorry for my finger-slip there:( DMacks (talk) 03:56, 27 June 2018 (UTC)53, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Perman
Hello,I am an official of "Fujiko Pro". "Fujiko Pro" is a Japanese company that manages all the things and works related to "Fujiko F Fujio". "Fujiko Pro" has official copyrights of "Perman",'"Doraemom" etc. I have noticed that there are wrong and incomplete information in the article "Perman". I want to fix but you are rolling back my edits everytime. I request you not to rollback my edits. I promise that whatever I will edit,I will give official sources and references. I hope that you will understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Perman Official (talk • contribs) 08:44, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Pings
You have to get them right the first time. You can't add to them. If you save a ping with an error in it or unsigned, you have to do it again. Doug Weller talk 13:20, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

You are correct
I saw an edit to the page FLCL and thought it was vandalism. I didn't notice that it was actually a grammatical correction. So my bad. I'm at least happy that my mistake was noticed. Funplussmart (talk) 14:52, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Space Patrol Luluco key visual.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:11, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Percent vs ems
Percent and Ems ??? I'm not going to enforce it since it's not an article on my watchlist and I was using it to search for something. D-Zero ( Talk  ·  Contribs ) 22:22, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Discussion at Deletion review/Log/2018 July 26
You are invited to join the discussion at Deletion review/Log/2018 July 26. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:38, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Banana Fish
Hiya. You removed the sentence It takes its name from J.D. Salinger's short story "A Perfect Day for Bananafish." from the article for Banana Fish per your claim it was an unsourced claim. The name of the first episode of the series is that exact title – "A Perfect Day for Bananafish" – which is exact same name as the short story, written 37 years earlier. The show also focuses on themes of PTSD and war, mirroring the original story from which it takes it name. I'm not sure what "source" would be acceptable here since it's very obviously named after that per… well, just, common sense (not to mention discussion around the show across the internet backing up this self-evident fact). To what extent does something irrefutably true need a source? How can we best note this or add this line back in? –Fpmfpm (talk) 09:56, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * What you presented is your own theory based on potential coincidences, but no statement by a reliable that there is any association between the manga and the short story. At best, your claim is entirely based on synthesis, which is prohibited on Wikipedia under the WP:No original research content policy. It is up to you to WP:PROVEIT by citing a reliable source that directly states the claim. —Farix (t &#124; c) 13:46, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * "Potential coincidences"? Lmao, what a joke. You know as well as I do it's a direct reference, as does the entire rest of the internet, and pretending it's not is ridiculous. I agree it's important to be able to "prove it," but I'm not engaging in your power play. Not mentioning it would be leaving out important info. That's all. If you're fine with the page being incomplete, then whatever. –Fpmfpm (talk) 09:23, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 * The Japanese Wikipedia article for "Banana fish" – バナナフィッシュ – lists two bullet points. The first is a link to the article for the short story. The second is a link to the article for the manga/anime which says it is "derived from the above" (上記に由来する), meaning the fact it's derived from/referencing the short story. This citation (#2) on the BANANA FISH page also mentions it. So how can we proceed? –Fpmfpm (talk) 09:32, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Here are some more sources:    . One of these mentions that an early chapter of the manga itself mentions the source of its name as from Salinger (which should be obvious anyway, as he coined the word "bananafish"). So feel free to tell me which one of these we should include in the citation, or how it should be referenced considering that the manga itself and thus the original author confirm it. –Fpmfpm (talk) 09:51, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:The Limit manga vol 1.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:The Limit manga vol 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:04, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Chu-Bra!! japanese manga vol 1 cover.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:07, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello there, I am not really sure how to use use the talk section well, but wanted to reach out; I am the anon who updated the Beyblade Burst music page. Those are both known music persons I have seen online in other shows. I don't really get where to cite this type of thing, if their websites/showing up when I google it aren't valid. It looks like they were probably part of a composer team, which happens a lot in TV stuff. Only the top name ends up on the press release, but that doesn't mean that was the only person who worked on it. I'm not gonna undo your edit, since I'm not sure how to proceed. Clarityofpurpose (talk) 02:12, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Harukana Receive and Reception Section
The reception section for Harukana Receive was not removed in error; it is misleading in its current form. Based off only three episodes' worth of content, it uses a single source that makes the assertion that the anime deals with "intentional homoerotism", which is not what Harukana Receive is about. I'd rather not have information about the anime that is untrue, based off the opinions of one source. If there is a place to add this reason, I will be happy to do so; please point the way. If the section is not to be removed, then what would be the preferred course of action? Thanks! Teh nubkilr (talk) 19:43, 23 September 2018 (UTC)


 * So it boils down to you not liking the opinion of that particular review. That is, however, not grounds for removing the review which is from a reliable source. If you want to provide balance, then add other reviews from other reliable sources about the series. The ANN Summer Preview provides several alternative views. There are reviews of the manga that haven't been added to the article either. But just because editors haven't added other reviews or are waiting on reliable sources to publish reviews of the series does not mean that you remove the review from a reliable source that is present on the article. —Farix (t &#124; c) 02:11, 24 September 2018 (UTC)


 * No, it boils down to the balance that you mentioned – don't assume bad faith here. I will use the source you described accordingly to expand out the section in due course. Teh nubkilr (talk) 04:44, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

File:The Master of Ragnarok & Blesser of Einherjar light novel vol 1.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:07, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Bokusatsu Tenshi Dokuro-chan light novel vol. 1.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:08, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Mushiuta light novel vol 1.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:21, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Gundam Build Divers
Hello, why did you remove the change I made? please! --11 Tom (talk) 13:40, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Because you did not cite a reliable source for the change. —Farix (t &#124; c) 22:12, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Kuroshitsuji
The reason why I added the manga's summary was because there were major spoilers dropped right in the initial opening paragraph. While I understand spoilers can still be included, I feel as if the entire paragraph should be rephrased and perhaps the major spoilers be moved to character specific articles or chapter summaries; for example, I do not believe "Ciel then endures the next month full of torture and rape." sounds very professional for Wikipedia standards and it can be very triggering for survivors of sexual abuse to see a word like "rape" right in an opening paragraph. Please consider rephrasing the entire paragraph, as well as adding an initial paragraph briefly describing the series' initial premise (such as the manga's summary) before leading into such a second paragraph. While I would do so myself, I'd appreciate if you wouldn't revert my edits again without considering this matter (though I do understand why you did, I'd appreciate if my points are considered as well.) Thank you. (I also noted the current paragraph does not cite any sources while I was citing the manga's published summary.) Also, if you have an issue with any edit of mine in the future, it'd be appreciated if I was contacted before revision so any changes or corrections could be made. It is not an article I frequent anyhow, it was simply something I noticed while catching up with the series, along with scattered grammar/spelling/etc. errors on other Kuroshitsuji articles, including that one.Awr1024 (talk) 22:54, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Kiteretsu
In Spain, LUK did distribute the series, and the titular character was made Nobita's cousin.

Proof? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OugebB1w9Is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_wL26J4S10

And more proof? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGJrgte9Ne8

And the Spanish Wikipedia says so as well: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiteretsu

--2601:199:4302:ABE0:45A1:6535:E04B:C9CB (talk) 16:40, 30 September 2018 (UTC)


 * None of those are reliable sources. Do read Wikipedia's policy on Venerability and do not restore content that has been challenged for lacking reliable sources. —Farix (t &#124; c) 17:00, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 * It is true. You should really think about contacting LUK and seeing if your "No, this series never aired in Europe because probably fake (i.e. in reality, real) evidence!" argument goes through. --2601:199:4302:ABE0:45A1:6535:E04B:C9CB (talk) 17:05, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Venerability is a core content criteria. If content cannot be verified by citing reliable, published sources, it CANNOT be included on Wikipedia. It does not matter how much you believe your edits to be true. —Farix (t &#124; c) 17:10, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Canvasing
Hi. Just as a heads up I do not really have editing buddies, but I wanted more views from people who work on film. Related articles a bit more as it's a film related article. The discussion on films in the anime and manga group seemed biased. I brought in users who I knew basics on following rules and can articulate themselves well. That's all. Hope it is ok. Andrzejbanas (talk) 02:52, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Gurazeni manga vol 1.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:09, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Dragon Ball page edit
Hi there, i edited the page and added the superhero genre because its an prominient genre in the DBZ franchise becaue he have characters that possess super hero traits Such as Goku, Gohan, Vegeta along the other the Z team characters, we even have masked heroes personas such as the Saibaman, Gohan hero's identity/costume so i added based on these facts. ZenIceHero (talk) 23:41, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * This is very much personal interpretation. Genres, like all other content, must be verifiable based on reliable sources. Without citing sources, it is simply original research. Secondly, the genre field is limited to the three most relevant genres. There are already three genres listed, all of which are sourced to the English-language distributor/publisher. The same is true for My Hero Academia. And finally, looking at your talk page, it is very clear that you have an extensive history of warns for not citing sources. If you wish to continue editing on Wikipedia, I advice that you read the content policies as soon as you can. —Farix (t &#124; c) 00:07, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Hello, I'm 1989. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, List of Naruto episodes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 1989 (talk) 12:50, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

...
Hey TheFarix,

Leafninja.com is a realiable source to you? I don't recall the people involved with the series making that site. Accurate or not, it is still not a reliable source. The Naruto reverts were unnecessary as well. My corrections along with the organization was reverted by you for an inaccurate reason. You should let people who have worked on articles longer and more than you to get them where they are to do what they need to do for improvement, and use the talk page. They're there for a reason. -- 1989 (talk) 13:14, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

The Saga of Tanya the Evil
You deleted my work due to it being original research. The book titles are mostly Latin quotes from Classical literature except for two famous heraldic mottoes (detailed elsewhere in wikipedia), a famous quote by Winston Churchill, and a famous quote from the Bible. If you looked at the references next to each quote, you would see that they line up. The author chose the quotes for their resonance to the events in each volume and the information broadens this understanding. Hotspur23 (talk) 15:24, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Those connections were your original analysis or synthesis and were not based on reliable, published sources. Nor did You cite any reliable, published sources that directly states that those titles have anything to do with quotes from classical literature, mottoes, or quotes from historical figures. Wikipedia does not publish original thought, but your edits to the article were exactly that. —Farix (t &#124; c) 15:55, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Perman
Sir,you have reverted my 2 edits from the article "Perman". Sir,can you tell me the reason for it ? If I have broken any rule,please tell me so I can contribute to the wikipedia in a better way.

Sorry for my grammatical and spelling mistakes... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siftuullah (talk • contribs) 14:13, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Because your edits are very similar to a Pakistani-based vandal who targeted the article previously. —Farix (t &#124; c) 20:18, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

I am sorry if my edits have vandalized the article.But I have some sources for my edits.Can you please allow me to edit this article ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siftuullah (talk • contribs)
 * I still believe that you are just another sockpuppet of the editor I mention (given timing of the Pakistani-based IP edits to the talk page) and have already field a Sockpuppet Investigation report based on the behavior evidence alone. —Farix (t &#124; c) 15:59, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Sir that was my past.I am sorry for that mistake.Now,this is my only account on wikipedia.I am a big fan of Perman.There is a lot of mistakes in the article of Perman on wikipedia.I want to fix them.Please allow me to do so.I promise that I will provide reliable source for my every edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siftuullah (talk • contribs)
 * I have no time for sockpuppets, especially those who pretended to be representative of the copyright owners and issuing legal threats to intimidate other editors. The SPI case has been updated and a notice placed at WP:ANI about your admission of block evasion and sockpuppetry. —Farix (t &#124; c) 17:07, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Food Wars BD 2.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:08, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Sir...Please Listen to me
Sir,Please listen to me. You have blocked my 4 accounts due to my fault (i.e., legal threat,vandalism,sockpuppetry). Sir,I am sorry for that but now this is my only account on Wikipedia. Sir,I promise that I will neither vandalize any article nor make any other account or issue a legal threat. Sir,I just want to improve the article "Perman". There are some major mistakes in that article and I want to correct them. I corrected them in past but someone kept reverting my edits,so I got angry and issued a legal threat. I am really sorry for that.I should not have done that. But,please sir understand. If you do not want me to edit the article "Perman",then I can give you the information and source of information. If you find them valid,then please modify the article "Perman".

I request you to consider my application. BoldP15 (talk) 06:23, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Attack on Titan Season 2 vol 1.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:10, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

List of Attack on Titan episodes
Can you have a look at what's happening regarding preempting Season 3 on List of Attack on Titan episodes. My feeling is that it should not be "pre-formatted" prior to broadcast, however I could be wrong. Ozflashman (talk) 10:53, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * What do you mean by "pre-formatted"? Is that referring to splitting the second cour in the Series overview section? AFAIK, that is not typically done for mid-season breaks. If it is about the "Part 1" and "Part 2" dividers, that is not typically done either. I would also change the "Last aired" cell for seasons three to either "present" or "TBA" because the season is still ongoing and the last episode has yet to air. —Farix (t &#124; c) 11:19, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * All of that. User:Jack Cox created a special section and colouring in the [List_of_Attack_on_Titan_episodes#Series_overview|Series overview box]] and "Part 1" and "Part 2" dividers but "Part 2" is due to air in 2019. I thought that this sort of formatting/design should happen only after airing - is this true, or are the guidelines unclear about this? Ozflashman (talk) 23:40, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Why is season 3 being divided on the list to begin with? The season may be on break until the spring, but that doesn't mean it gets separate headings or other formatting. —Farix (t &#124; c) 23:43, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Exactly, however after undoing the special formatting twice, I don't want to get into an argument with User:Jack Cox so was looking for an appropriate approach to take and/or guideline. Ozflashman (talk) 02:45, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I took the formatting out while spitting the seasons out into their on respective sublists. Jack Cox only added the formatting once with an IP restoring the formatting you removed from the season overview once as well. If Cox or anyone else wants to restore that formatting, it needs to be discussed on the list's talk page per the WP:BRD cycle. The leads of those sublists still needs more work, like adding in streaming, licensing, and theme music, but they are in a relatively good place to serve as a start. —Farix (t &#124; c) 12:01, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Ozflashman (talk) 22:29, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The "ShortSummary" seems to have disappeared from view in these episode lists although still there in the code. Is this something to do with the "/sublist" setting? Ozflashman (talk) 00:07, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
 * You will have to contact about that mess. I'm just fully irritated at the haphazard handling of Japanese episode list‎ which ended up breaking things everywhere simply because one editor wanted to stuff square pegs into round holes in just to have one episode template for everything. —Farix (t &#124; c) 12:21, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Looks like it's fixed now!
 * FYI, I'm replacing the Blue Ray cover art you added with a small Attack on Titan logo to bring the episode table closer to the top to improve readability. The page colour coding should suffice to differentiate the seasons. The Blue Ray covers could be added in later when there is some "Home video releases" information. Ozflashman (talk) 23:53, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I always consider logos to be a terrible way to identify the subject, especially when dealing with foreign language media. Covers at least lets the reader identify the art style and the characters to make sure that they found the right page. —Farix (t &#124; c) 00:00, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The image has been removed as I obviously did not upload it with the appropriate permissions (Attack_on_Titan_logo_small.jpg). Even though I though it was an appropriate solution, I don't intend to pursue it. Ozflashman (talk) 21:43, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * This is pretty much akin to what happened with Mad Men and Breaking Bad during their final seasons. This is Season 3 With Two Parts, the first part has finished airing and the second will air starting in April and they have seemingly gone out of their may to make it clear that there's a break in here.Jack Cox (talk) 00:34, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Season breaks happen on a fairly regular occurrence, that doesn't mean they are treated as if they were some sort of informal mini-season. —Farix (t &#124; c) 00:40, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Elfen Lied
Have you considered that the information you removed is also in List of Elfen Lied episodes?

Also, the information is not original research as everyone has access to those texts (they are in the public domain), the texts are widely known, everyone can easily verify that a literal quotation from an ancient Latin text is, well, a literal quotation from an ancient Latin text.

Ignisāra (talk) 01:04, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Food Wars BD 3.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 22:14, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cardfight!! Vanguard promo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cardfight!! Vanguard promo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Urotsukidōji manga vol 1 (2004 reprint).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Urotsukidōji manga vol 1 (2004 reprint).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

"List of Naruto: Shippuden episodes (season 8) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect &. Since you had some involvement with the "List of Naruto: Shippuden episodes (season 8) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:46, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

"List of Naruto: Shippuden episodes (season 9) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect &. Since you had some involvement with the "List of Naruto: Shippuden episodes (season 9) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:47, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

MNCTV
MNCTV 28 tahun manda TPI Oktober 2019 TheFarix MNCTV Jakarta untuk Pagi TPI (Indonesia) Sock Manda 1993 --Ayfrom (talk) 17:10, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
 * This is the English-language Wikipedia, thus you are required to use English. Second, continuing to added unsourced content to article will only result in your edits being reverted. —Farix (t &#124; c) 18:29, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reverting this perennial sock JarrahTree 23:37, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pretty Rhythm vol 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Pretty Rhythm vol 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Shonen
I have provided evidence and asked you to add this link to the citation. https://books.google.com/books?id=uY8700WJy_gC&pg=PA1&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=4#v=onepage&q=Shonen&f=false This is a very reliable source. Robin E. Brenner is known for her credibility in knowing manga. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SG1994! (talk • contribs) 21:37, 29 May 2019 (UTC)


 * All this does is very that the age range is very similar. But this is not proof that the 8-18 age range is wrong. Secondly, Deb Aoki has previously written about manga for About.com's Manga website and currently Anime News Network, so she is very much a expert on the subject. —Farix (t &#124; c) 21:39, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Yes but there are a substantial amount of sites that say it’s for 12 to 18 years of age. Deb Aoki is the only person to claim that but she has no evidence to support that. She is merely assuming that’s the age range when there is no consistency to that and while Kodomo-muke (for children) is the only confirmed manga demographic that age range fits in. While most sources say that Shonen is for boys ages 12 to 18. In fact most agree it’s for teen boys. Some say tween to teen boys but tween refers to 12. You want multiple sources then here I will provide them for you. And once you read all these please consider adding these to the references and change the age range of the Shonen demographic on the page. Thank you. https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ShonenDemographic?from=Main.Shonen

https://nihonmangaworld.wordpress.com/2013/10/22/shonen-jump/

https://allthetropes.org/w/index.php?title=Shōnen_manga&useformat=mobile#

https://books.google.com/books?id=E03KBgAAQBAJ&q=Teenage+readers#v=snippet&q=Shonen&f=false

https://books.google.com/books?id=uY8700WJy_gC&pg=PA1&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=4#v=snippet&q=Twelve%20&f=false

https://geekandsundry.com/an-introduction-to-manga/

http://manga.yoexpert.com/types-of-manga-10465/what-are-the-different-types-of-manga-43730.html

http://www.hxchector.com/anime-and-manga-types/

https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shōnen_(media)

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=manga

https://bookriot.com/2019/01/30/guide-to-manga/

https://m.wikihow.com/Get-Into-Manga

https://reelrundown.com/animation/animanga_genres

http://guides.lib.jjay.cuny.edu/c.php?g=288313&p=1922706

https://anigamers.com/2009/08/otakon-09-shonen-manga-history-of.html

https://animanga.fandom.com/wiki/Shōnen

https://www.nypl.org/blog/2018/12/27/beginners-guide-manga — Preceding unsigned comment added by SG1994! (talk • contribs) 02:59, 31 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Wikis and blogs are not reliable sources. Those that remain also state "tweens", which includes those as young as 8, or makes it clear that the demographic isn't exclusively defined as teenage. In fact, almost all don't give a definitive age range at all. So none of these show that Deb Aoki is incorrect, and several backs up her expanded age range to 8 by using the term "tweens". —Farix (t &#124; c) 11:22, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

First off you are wrong. Tween means 12 and only 12. In fact the word Tween comes from the pronunciation of the number Twelve! 😂😂😂 Wow you are an idiot! SG1994! (talk) 06:15, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Second, *Wiki and blogs are not a reliable source* Wow! For a person who works for Wikipedia that’s hypocritical for you to say. Ain’t that the pot calling the kettle black. 😂 Regardless most of the sources on here say they are for teen boys. https://books.google.com/books?id=E03KBgAAQBAJ&q=Teenage+readers#v=snippet&q=Shonen&f=false

https://books.google.com/books?id=uY8700WJy_gC&pg=PA1&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=4#v=snippet&q=Twelve%20&f=false

http://www.hxchector.com/anime-and-manga-types/

https://nihonmangaworld.wordpress.com/2013/10/22/shonen-jump/ These are not blogs or Wikis. So don’t make any bullshit excuses. These are reliable sources. Even the one that talks about Shonen Jump says and I quote: “Shōnen Jump was a bi-monthly for young male teenagers. Until April 1969, it was published alternating with the bi-monthly Shōnen Jump Book, a shōnen magazine founded in 1958 which was a competitors of the Weekly Shōnen Magazine and Weekly Shōnen Sunday magazines from editors Kōdansha and Shōgakukan. For its 20th publication, Weekly Shōnen Magazine merged with Shōnen Book and became the weekly magazine under the name Weekly Shōnen Jump.” Not is how it says “young male teenagers”. 😂 In fact several Japanese sources I read say Shonen is for young teens. Not Pre-teen or Tween. Just teen boys. Even Japanese Youtubers. Deb Aoki hasn’t even provided a source to prove 8 to 18 is even correct. In fact, it’s pretty clear she merely assumed that cuz of the fact she saw boys that age reading it. Just because kids then liked them doesn’t mean they were aimed towards them. Plus there is already a demographic for kids and it’s called Kodomo-muke. It would be pointless to have that if Shonen was for 8 to 18. Also Deb Aoki claims there are only 4 demographic of manga when there are in fact 5. Kodomo-muke, Shonen, Shojo, Seinen and Josei. Yet no Japanese source or person has ever confirmed 8 to 18 is even correct. Not even Japanese sites that talk about Shonen. In fact most Japanese I know personally disagree with that. And they are working on becoming mangeka. They say Shonen is for 12 to 18. As well as Robin E. Brenner’s book Understanding Manga And Anime. Which Deb Aoki agrees with nowadays. Also in one of the links above and happens to be one of the most resource books regarding manga. Guess Deb Aoki is either wrong or a hypocrite. Seems you will make any excuse for Deb Aoki cuz you are in too much denial to accept the truth. Or just bias of her. 😂😂😂😂 SG1994! (talk) 06:20, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

What? Got nothing else to say? Looks like I win this argument. Might as well admit your wrong and change that Shonen page to the right age range. Stop believe Deb Aoki. She is not as much as an expert as you think. She is more of a manga artist. There are Youtubers with more manga credibility than her. Most are from Japan. And they all say Shonen is mostly for young teen boys. SG1994! (talk) 22:39, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Shonen
Wow. Deleting my facts now? Oh wow. Sore loser. 😂😂😂😂 SG1994! (talk) 04:59, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Surprised you haven’t said a word back to me. Still thinking Deb Aoki is correct? Cuz many Japanese people who are experts in the same field strongly disagree with her. I’ve spoken to them. And they say Shonen is usually for teen boys. Not 8 to 18. They even said that’s way too low as 8 year old range is more for Kodomo-muke. So Shonen is not for 8 to 18. It’s 12 to 18. Cuz 12 and up is a low teen rating in Japan. So 12 to 18 is the more plausible fact. Deb Aoki hasn’t been doing well enough research. She isn’t even from Japan so I don’t take credibility from non-Japanese manga experts. Lots of mistranslations and misconceptions are made on her article and I can tell where she messed up. She even claims there are only four manga types when there are in fact five. Kodomo-muke Shojo Shonen Seinen Josei That’s all. SG1994! (talk) 06:44, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

It seems Deb Aoki agrees with Robin E. Brinner’s book. And even quotes it. So it seems Robin’s book “Understanding Manga and Anime is a good enough source to back up my claim. LMFAO https://www.liveabout.com/essential-manga-for-libraries-2283061 SG1994! (talk) 07:39, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Also it seems you are wrong of what a tween is. 8 year olds are not tweens. Tweens are between 10-13. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preadolescence SG1994! (talk) 07:47, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dragon Ball Super Key visual.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dragon Ball Super Key visual.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Tokyo Ghoul
(1) Please cite your source concerning use of ‘’cite’’ in ‘external links’’, I do not see it.

(2) Your edit retort comment to just ‘’drop the dead link’’ is a non-starter for any real editor, so please stop playing ‘’deletionist’’ via ‘’revert’’, my edit includes the REPAIR of the dead link.

(3) Next Time,instead of doing a ‘’drive-by’’ edit via a lazy ‘’revert’’ try a ‘’real’’ edit — don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.  WurmWoode  T   04:25, 4 August 2019 (UTC)


 * "This Citation Style 1 template is used to create citations for web sources" So yes, the citation templates are only used for citations. Second, you are the one who was "driving by". I've had that article on my watch list for years do to repeated vandalism. You, on the other hand, have never edited that article before. And you retort that I not a "real editor" because I reverted your non-constructive edits is nothing but a personal attack and I would advice you to refrain from any further personal attacks. —Farix (t &#124; c) 10:29, 4 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Thanks so much for the quick response, but it is incomplete, not fully addressing the points/questions raised, and then there is the question now of your appendage of ‘’ad hominen’’ and ‘’special pleading’’.


 * No thanks, such is really non-sequitar, unnecessary, unprofessional, yes, retorts—— furthering my initial assessment of your demonstrated ‘’drive-by’’ style. Which interpretation was reached by assessing your own edit commentaries which indicated NO regard for the repair of the dead link, and your preference to just delete such items and NOT to repair them.  With your special pleading based upon self-alleged curation duration, in that context that seems rather strange:  deletionism vs. repair.


 * Your haste is clearly further demonstrated even here, your obviously ignoring your own spelling and grammar checker:
 * I advice/advise you
 * do/due to
 * I (am) not a
 * WP:IRONY, much??


 * (1) I repeat, for my own edification, something I hope (wish) you are amenable towards, where may I find your WikiPedia source (rule/law) concerning how external links are to be encoded. And NO, your asserted opinion is insufficient.  Thank you.    WurmWoode  T   01:36, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Sonic X DVD.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Sonic X DVD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Dragon Ball work group project pages


A tag has been placed on Category:Dragon Ball work group project pages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 19:57, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Broadcast
PLEASE DO NOT remove the international broadcast, as you did on Jewelpet (TV series)! As i said numerous times, you can easily add the sources yourself! CuteDolphin712 (talk) 17:51, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Max Lovely! manga vol 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Max Lovely! manga vol 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:27, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox animanga character
Template:Infobox animanga character has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Grapesoda22 (talk) 01:06, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Nihongo-s
Template:Nihongo-s has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 22:26, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

"List of List of Attack on Titan episodes (season 1)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of List of Attack on Titan episodes (season 1). Since you had some involvement with the List of List of Attack on Titan episodes (season 1) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC  678  04:14, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dragon Quest Legend of the Hero Abel DVD vol 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dragon Quest Legend of the Hero Abel DVD vol 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The World God Only Knows II


A tag has been placed on The World God Only Knows II requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://sanningx.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-world-god-only-knows.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Onel 5969  TT me 11:41, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Category:Anime and manga episode redirects to lists has been nominated for renaming
Category:Anime and manga episode redirects to lists has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 16:33, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Welcome back!
Hello and welcome back to Wikipedia! I see that you have edited recently, and wanted to let you know that I removed you from the list of missing Wikipedians. If you ever decide to take another wikibreak or retire (which I hope you don’t!), you can leave a message on your user page. Glad to see you’re back! Happy editing, Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 02:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Powerpuff Girls Z vol 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Powerpuff Girls Z vol 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

"DList of Dragon Ball Z episodes (season 9)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect DList of Dragon Ball Z episodes (season 9). The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 10 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:20, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Hope all is well
Hello TheFarix! I hope you are doing well. I just wanted to let you know that I added you to Missing Wikipedians. If you ever come back, or choose not to have your name on this list, just let me know. Hope you come back, even just to check in, Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 21:51, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mobile Suit Gundam Char&#39;s Counterattack DVD.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mobile Suit Gundam Char&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mobile Suit Gundam SEED Astray Vol 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mobile Suit Gundam SEED Astray Vol 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
Hello TheFarix! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! &mdash; MusikBot II  talk  17:21, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Girls und Panzer manga vol 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Girls und Panzer manga vol 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Girls Saurus vol 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Girls Saurus vol 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Food Wars!: Shokugeki no Soma
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, TheFarix!


Happy New Year! TheFarix, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

— Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 02:51, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 02:51, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Yu-Gi-Oh! Zexal vol 1.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Yu-Gi-Oh! Zexal vol 1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 16:17, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Honey Bunny! manga vol 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Honey Bunny! manga vol 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:12, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

"Wikipedia:DIT" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:DIT&redirect=no Wikipedia:DIT] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Is la  🏳️‍⚧ 10:39, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Maze manga vol 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Maze manga vol 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 15 November 2023 (UTC)