User talk:TheFranzFerdinand

March 2017
Hello, I'm Justeditingtoday. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of single sign-on implementations have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Justeditingtoday (talk) 15:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Answer
Hi, thanks for your message but I do not agree with this explanation. And if so why don't you remove the other commercial solutions from the list? I do not see the difference with a totaly commercial solution (eg. OpenAM) and Wigth SSO (that I bought and have been using and working with for 2 months - licence is less Open Source with Forgerock than with Wight SSO...). Because I use to work on SSO solutions for years, I am aware of it and I objectively think it's a nice promising solution. It has its position in this list.

Your argument leant torward : to be in this list, you have to be a mega commercial solution, everybody knows (or open source).

Or maybe you have your proper SSO solution in the list and you prefer less lines to promote more your line ?