User talk:TheFriendlyFas2

December 2021
Hello, I'm Vif12vf. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Faisceau, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 22:27, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at National Synarchist Union, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 22:27, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Bolivian Socialist Falange, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 22:27, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at National Falange. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 22:28, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roald Nikolai Flemestad (December 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Caleb Stanford was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roald Nikolai Flemestad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Roald Nikolai Flemestad, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Roald_Nikolai_Flemestad Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Caleb_Stanford&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Roald_Nikolai_Flemestad reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Caleb Stanford (talk) 01:40, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roald Nikolai Flemestad (December 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roald Nikolai Flemestad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Roald Nikolai Flemestad, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Roald_Nikolai_Flemestad Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rusalkii&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Roald_Nikolai_Flemestad reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rusalkii (talk) 03:13, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Hi TheFriendlyFas2! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 07:45, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Why did you change your political position on your user page from fascist to third position?
Doug Weller talk 08:59, 25 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Because I feel as though 'Third Position' more accurately represents my political views, that being said I'm still a fascist or at least some variation of it. I also don't want people to think that I'm a Nazi or a racist. TheFriendlyFas2 (talk) 06:20, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Religion
Please stop spamming articles with religious affiliations. Religion is only used as an infobox parameter when the subject is a religious leader. DrKay (talk) 08:17, 26 February 2023 (UTC)


 * I've seen a great number of articles about non-religious leaders who have their religious affiliation listed in the infobox. Isn't the point of the infoboxes to make information easily accessible and convenient? And there are infobox templates specifically for religious leaders so why even include the option to add religious affilation? TheFriendlyFas2 (talk) 08:27, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
 * "Religion may be listed if relevant, sourced and uncontroversial." Not "Religion may be listed if subject is a religious leader" also why'd you reverse my edits with the same reasoning every time? TheFriendlyFas2 (talk) 08:50, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Please remove it from those articles. Articles should only have one infobox. We don't include infobox royalty and infobox religious leader on people who are both. So, parameters are sometimes copied over to ensure flexibility for when people have dual roles. It doesn't mean that every parameter should be filled. DrKay (talk) 09:13, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
 * "We don't include infobox royalty and infobox religious leader on people who are both. So, parameters are sometimes copied over to ensure flexibility for when people have dual roles" okay that makes sense but that doesn't mean that the role shouldn't be filled because religion is a relevant characteristic of many monarchs. And if the subject has to also be a religious figure then how is it that there are numerous articles in which the subject's religious affiliation is included but the subject isn't a religious leader? This is the first time anybody has told me that the subject has to be a religious leader for their religious affiliation to be included because it isn't necessary. TheFriendlyFas2 (talk) 09:36, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
 * As I said, it should be removed from articles in which the subject's religious affiliation is irrelevant. You haven't been adding it to monarchs or religious leaders. You've been adding it to people that are neither. DrKay (talk) 09:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay then why would my edits be reverted for actual monarchs? TheFriendlyFas2 (talk) 21:44, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
 * See the edit summaries and individual article talk pages. DrKay (talk) 22:17, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
Hello, I'm Veverve. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Polish National Catholic Church, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Veverve (talk) 15:49, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Categories should reflect what is within the article
Categories should reflect what is already within the article, as per Categorization. Veverve (talk) 15:50, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Asqueladd (talk) 07:19, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Disambiguation link notification for June 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Folk saint, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bouillon, Arcozelo and Chincha.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Folk saint, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emperor of the Romans.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siberian Evangelical Lutheran Church, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Denomination.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

ANI notification
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HadesTTW (he/him • talk) 00:09, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 06:31, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

My username was assumed to be The Friendly Fascist but that's not what it is. My username is TheFriendlyFas2, and the username itself doesn't refer to anything specifically and thus doesn't violate any policies. My username wasn't intended to mean "The Friendly Fascist" anyway so the claim that my username is a sort of code to mean "The Friendly Fascist" is based on pure speculation and assumptions. But in any case, I was blocked for disruptive editing not for having an inappropriate username. Please consider unblocking my account. Thank you! TheFriendlyFas2 (talk) 23:06, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

It's not the exact same thing actually since I did something different. I made an addition to include the bit about my username, because that was the reason why my first request was denied. I kept the rest to make my other points clear. With this information in mind please consider unblocking my account. Thank you! TheFriendlyFas2 (talk) 08:35, 15 November 2023 (UTC)