User talk:TheGodfather1987

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:30, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Edit war
Hello. You appear to be involved in an edit war on Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University. While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus. Continued edit warring may cause you to be blocked. Toddst1 (talk) 21:01, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for spamming or advertising. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 21:26, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Suggestion
Bwilkins' suggestions above are very good. I'd also be looking to learn what you plan to edit besides hyping ERAU. In fact, a voluntary topic ban on ERU might be useful in any attempt to be unblocked. Toddst1 (talk) 17:12, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Ref backing my claim!
http://www.amtonline.com/online/article.jsp?siteSection=1&id=9053 http://www.erau.edu/er/newsmedia/newsreleases/2009/usnews.html http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/08/20/idUS216659+20-Aug-2009+PRN20090820 http://news.erau.edu/top-news/find-news-releases/2010/index.html And dozens more.TheGodfather1987 (talk) 10:24, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Considering you ask us to look at those links, can we ask you to look at WP:RS, which will show beyond reasonable doubt that your links are not reliable sources, or WP:NEUTRAL, which will show beyond a reasonable doubt that your wording is not acceptable in an encyclopedia? I may add that you are not doing your school any favors by dragging them through all of this--it's really bad PR. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Tweak: the Reuters thing probably could be cited, though it's indirect, and a reference to the original source is much better. That bit of information can have its place in the article, but not in the way in which you are trying to get it in, and certainly not in those words. Drmies (talk) 15:51, 12 July 2011 (UTC)