User talk:TheGoodIndian

Welcome!
Hello, TheGoodIndian, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Nicky mathew (talk) 15:21, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Recording my thanks.
TheGoodIndian would like to say that the thoughtful gesture by Nicky mathew was highly appreciated. Hope that people like you would always be there to guide me through the world of Wikipedia. I thank you, once again. TheGoodIndian (talk) 10:11, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Copy-editing and content change
Dear GoodIndian, thanks for your copy-editing work on a broad range of India-related articles. However, please take care not to mix copy-editing with content changes. Moreover, you need to be careful not to add WP:OR in the midst of sourced content. Any passage that has a citation should only describe what the sources say. All the best! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:10, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Frozen - Disambiguation page guidelines (One live link per page)
Thank you for your work on Frozen. Unfortunately, disambiguation pages do not follow the same stylistic rules as normal pages.

Please see the disambiguation style guide for more information. If you have any questions not answered there,

or try the help desk. Ubcule (talk) 15:32, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Stalingrad
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Stalingrad you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of JohnWickTwo -- JohnWickTwo (talk) 01:40, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Battle of Stalingrad - GA nomination
Hi there, I notice you have nominated Battle of Stalingrad for GA. Just skimming the article, I can see multiple issues, including clean up tags and there are numerous paragraphs that are uncited. These will definitely require fixing and will involve accessing sources to confirm the information in those paragraphs and then adding the necessary cites. This will be very time consuming for such a large article and will need multiple sources. Looking at the article history, I see that you have not made any edits to it. As it is expected that the nominator do the necessary work to rectify any issues arising out of the review, can you confirm that you have both the time and resources to do this? If you haven't, then I recommend that I quick fail the article. You can then take your time to sort out the issues and make sure the article meets GA criteria and re-nominate it when it is ready. If you haven't already, I also suggest checking out Nominating good articles. Let me know, cheers, Zawed (talk) 01:50, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
 * And I see the article has found a reviewer already. If you want to have this quickfailed, you will need to let them know before they invest too much time in it. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 02:00, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Reply To Zawed
Sir, I am glad that you went through the article about Stalingrad and pointed out its weaknesses. Practically, I had nominated the article simply to know if there were any real deficiencies in it or it had simply escaped the notice of the editors. Removing the nomination is probably the right thing to do. I will inform the reviewer immediately. By the way, if you had some spare time, could you look into 'Indo-Pakistani War of 1971'? I nominated it for good article status, too, again without properly knowing the guidelines (I joined Wikipedia less than 3 years ago, and have been serious about it for an even lesser period of time). TheGoodIndian (talk) 11:09, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Stalingrad
The article Battle of Stalingrad you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Battle of Stalingrad for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of JohnWickTwo -- JohnWickTwo (talk) 23:21, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Indo-Pakistani War of 1971
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 15:20, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Indo-Pakistani War of 1971
The article Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 15:20, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Indo-Pakistani War of 1971
The article Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 16:21, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

August 2020
Djm-leighpark (talk) 20:24, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Madhuri Dixit
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Madhuri Dixit you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. DTM (talk) 13:53, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Please can you please address the comment I have left on Talk:Madhuri Dixit/GA1. Otherwise I will have to fail the GA nom without a proper review. DTM (talk) 06:32, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Madhuri Dixit
The article Madhuri Dixit you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Madhuri Dixit for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DiplomatTesterMan -- DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 13:02, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dilip Mahalanabis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DCH. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)


 * TheGoodIndian (talk) 15:31, 30 November 2023 (UTC)