User talk:TheGreenSaga

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Kukini 08:34, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Re: Lost edits
Hi, and thanks for your concerns. I assume good faith when new editors make constructive edits, but I do not believe that your edits were improving the overall quality of the article. There are many of us who are trying to bring Lost to a featured article status. All major edits we make to the page are first discussed on the talk page. If you feel that your edits are necessary to make the article better, please feel free to go to the talk page and argue your case. You're free to edit any page on Wikipedia, but it's good etiquette to discuss your planned changes on the talk page first. If you have anymore questions you can reply on my talk page. Thanks! Jtrost (T | C | #) 23:03, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

The Stony Brook Press Editorial Board
The Stony Brook Press Editorial Board has been proposed for deletion. Please see WP:NOT for the relevant concerns. NickelShoe 20:53, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry I wasn't more specific, I was in a hurry, and since I wasn't the one who proposed it, I could really only give you a general link for this particular concern. Basically, they don't think this information is of general interest. They're claiming it violates "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information." You could also check out Notability, which might help.
 * I see that you removed the prod template. That's okay, but you would have been better off to explain it in your edit summary and put some reasoning on the talk page.  Because since you didn't explain why you disagreed, the article was pretty much immediately sent to Articles for deletion/The Stony Brook Press Editorial Board.  There's a discussion going on there about whether it should be kept or not.  You'll want to go over there and explain why you think the information should be kept, as you did on my talk page.  (Also, make sure to sign your post with ~, that way it's clear who's saying what.)
 * One thing to consider is that it's not so much an encyclopedia article. It ought to have an introduction that links back to The Stony Brook Press and explains why the list is of interest and stuff.  Check out Guide to layout.  You actually might consider merging this information into the article on The Stony Brook Press instead, though I understand why you have it separate for length considerations. Is this information available externally?  Could you simply put an external link at The Stony Brook Press for people to look up if they want to do extra research?
 * Other than that, I don't know really what to tell you. I don't see the information as being particularly important to the encyclopedia, but I don't see the rush to get rid of it.  Just make sure to post at Articles for deletion/The Stony Brook Press Editorial Board, make some improvements to the article, and post at the deletion discussion again to make sure they know what improvements you've made.  NickelShoe 15:01, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Time Belt
A tag has been placed on Time Belt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  TN ‑ X - Man  15:37, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Standalone (media)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Standalone (media), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Bongomatic (talk) 16:48, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

File:Timebeltlogo.png missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Timebeltlogo.png

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 09:20, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

File:PressLogoNew.gif listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PressLogoNew.gif, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:51, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Timebeltlogo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Timebeltlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:49, 29 January 2020 (UTC)