User talk:TheGurgeman7

February 2020
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page 2020 VCDL Lobby Day has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. You did much more than "add a cite". Doug Weller  talk 13:03, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to 2020 VCDL Lobby Day. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. ''These were serious violations of both NPOV and WP:VERIFY: "Threats of violence cause by provocateurs prompted the governor of Virginia to declare an illegitimate state of emergency ahead of the event in order to influence the public opinion of the event before it occured." and virtually all of "Lasting effects".'' Doug Weller  talk 13:04, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Threats of violence cause by provocateurs prompted the governor of Virginia to declare an illegitimate [[state of emergency ahead of the event in order to influence the public opinion of the event before it occured.]], as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". This one's pretty obvious.  Doug Weller  talk 13:05, 3 February 2020 (UTC)