User talk:TheImaCow/Archive/2020/April

Archive #1, starting from 4. April 2020
Hello, TheImaCow, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Kleuske (talk) 12:45, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 13:17, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh, thanks for the tip! ^^ TheImaCow (talk) 13:21, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi there!
Hi there Thelma! I see you have been reverting vandalism. I would like to recommend you the anti-vandalism tool Twinkle. While I don't think you will be able to use it right now as you are not autoconfirmed, you should be able to use it from tomorrow or day after tomorrow, when you become autoconfirmed. It makes it easier to revert vandalism and warn or report users, as it provides a vast toolbox of actions that you can take. You can revert edits, warn users, request speedy deletion of a page, start a deletion discussion, add tags to a page, report vandals and welcome users with it. Just go to your preferences - under the "Gadgets" section, you'll find the option Twinkle. Switch it on, and use it to get rid of vandalism. Happy editing, and best of luck! -- Java Hurricane  17:09, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Nice, thanks! :D TheImaCow (talk) 17:27, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Editing page - Miloš Biković
Hi, We received message while editing page about Miloš Biković:

Hello, I'm TheImaCow. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TheImaCow (talk) 16:59, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

When we were editing page, we didnt described changes by Wikipedia manual. We are part of Miloš Biković team, so all changes all relevant, and it is important for us that all informationes on this page are relevant and correct. If you need additional info, dont hesetate to ask.

P.S. We need to make changes on almost entire page, bcs it must be updated.

Thank you in advance

Andresabg (talk) 18:08, 4 April 2020 (UTC)


 * I just noticed this because I happened to be leaving a message below. Fyi, user Andresabg has since been informed that they should not be editing that article at all, due to conflict of interest. Also, the warning from TheImaCow about using an edit summary when removing content was correct. --IamNotU (talk) 12:29, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Inspecting multiple edits
Hi TheImaCow, welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for your work on cleaning up vandalism. I just wanted to give you a tip: when you see a bad edit, try to give extra close scrutiny to any preceeding edits by the same user, as they most often need to be reverted too. For example, today in the Miguel Díaz-Canel article, you cleaned up some edits by an IP, but left others, in particular, one where they had modified a direct quotation in a citation.

As it turns out, the IP is a banned user, but you couldn't have known that. I've reverted all the edits. Hope this helps, and thanks again... --IamNotU (talk) 12:21, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

About your edit on the complete saga...
The reason why I made that edit was because of a discussion going on at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games where many users have been talking about removing the plot section entirely or reducing it to 1-3 sentences since the size of the plot section is bigger than everything else combined. Ocelot Creeper ( ta lk ) 03:10, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Ah, ok. It looked like vandalism to me. i reverted my edit now, back to your version ^^ TheImaCow (talk) 03:20, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Come play the Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure


 * Thanks for telling me that, i played it and it was pretty fun! TheImaCow (talk) 07:40, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

My accurate edits.
My well-known edits got taken down. =( Bad Wiki Edits (talk) 11:07, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * jep, veeeery good edits TheImaCow (talk) 11:15, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

G13 speedy deletion
Please check the edit histories of each draft before tagging G13. I have indicated in my reverts when the last human edits were on the two drafts you tagged. Jalen Folf  (talk)  07:10, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, I looked into the history every time, but probably not quite right ;). I thought that this (left side) e.g. would be from a bot. TheImaCow (talk) 07:15, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boolong has been accepted
 Boolong, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Boolong help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! — Sago tree spirit  (talk) 13:24, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brosdale Island has been accepted
 Brosdale Island, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Brosdale_Island help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Sulfurboy (talk) 13:42, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bulbophyllum kupense (April 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bulbophyllum kupense and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bulbophyllum kupense, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Bulbophyllum_kupense Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sulfurboy&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Bulbophyllum_kupense reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 14:10, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Can't Get There from Here (Bless the Harts) (April 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Can't Get There from Here (Bless the Harts) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Can't Get There from Here (Bless the Harts), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Can%27t_Get_There_from_Here_(Bless_the_Harts) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Can%27t_Get_There_from_Here_(Bless_the_Harts) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 19:09, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carol Moseley Braun 2004 presidential campaign (April 22)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carol Moseley Braun 2004 presidential campaign and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Carol Moseley Braun 2004 presidential campaign, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Carol_Moseley_Braun_2004_presidential_campaign Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_arndt&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Carol_Moseley_Braun_2004_presidential_campaign reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:55, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

.
can you get a life? — Preceding unsigned comment added by FiniteBubble (talk • contribs)
 * I ask that one who wants to advertise his Insta account on Wikipedia TheImaCow (talk) 05:51, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

More about anti vandal.
Hello, like you, I am relatively new to editing Wikipedia (I had an account since 2018 but only started editing recently). I like making conservative individuals and organizations look as bad as possible on Wikipedia because I disagree with their political stance. I would recommend you request for the rollback feature here. After that, you will have acess to more tools like Huggle. I use huggle and find it very useful! J cool bro  (talk) 20:36, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Orangezest9004
This user says on the talk page that a promise to add sources would be "granted". But this edit has no source. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 21:02, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I have now explained to him how this works, (on his talkpage) hope it helps TheImaCow (talk) 05:27, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Chi Chi London has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Chi Chi London. Thanks! Zeromonk (talk) 10:24, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Draftifying
Hello TheIma, regarding Ogun state, it's best to wait about half an hour before moving a page to drafts. Many new users create very short articles just to see if it works and then slowly work on adding sources. See you around, – Thjarkur (talk) 18:04, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh...yeah. Good to know, thanks! TheImaCow (talk) 18:05, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve Stoyan Stoyanov (footballer)
Hello, TheImaCow,

Thank you for creating Stoyan Stoyanov (footballer).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains (talk) 18:18, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Anjum Lucknowi moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Anjum Lucknowi, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lopifalko (talk) 06:31, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Rus' vs Russia and Ruthenians vs Russians
Hey, There is mistake in translation of cyrillic signs on the map into English - Instead of Russia - Rus' should be and instead of Russian - Ruthenians. Besides you can read on the Demography on left from the map - No country of the Austrian monarchy had such a varied ethnic mix as Galicia: - and there are no Russians but Ruthenians that is not the same. What are your arguments? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.199.236.157 (talk) 06:08, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Ok, i reverted it because it looked like vandalism to me. But if what you say is true, then I have no problem with that :) TheImaCow (talk) 06:14, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Accuracy in Media - liberals cannot stand unbiased entries
TheImaCow - please enlighten me in the editing of Wikipedia. How is having a line in the Accuracy in Media entry that calls a related website a "right wing conspiracy website..." constructive?

I have a sneaky suspicion that if I edited the Media Matters website to call it an "extreme Left wing Socialist conspiracy site." you would immediately delete it.

The truth is that you, like many other editors, pursue a political agenda and have used Wikipedia to help create George Orwells Ministry of Truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.139.127.66 (talk) 06:11, 25 April 2020 (UTC)


 * I reverted your edit, because here, at the top, are two citations that the Site is "far right". And if so, you should say it too. TheImaCow (talk) 06:18, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

So, because another Wikipedia page, that can be edited by anyone, says it, it has to be true, right? If you follow the "source." which is a link to a news article, not an independent scholarly review of the Gateway Pundit website, you will notice that the author never says that the website is a "right-wing conspiracy" website. I challenge you to either present a non-biased source that calls the website a "right-wing conspiracy" website or delete the intentionally provocative language from what is supposed to be an unbiased entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.139.127.66 (talk) 06:46, 25 April 2020 (UTC)


 * On the page linked to source No. 3 it says "The 4chan board posts were quickly picked up and magnified by The Gateway Pundit, a far-right website that has repeatedly misidentified attackers and continues to promote debunked conspiracy theories about President Barack Obama's birthplace, among other misinformation."

- https://web.archive.org/web/20171007170509/http://uk.businessinsider.com/las-vegas-shooting-mandalay-bay-facebook-twitter-google-2017-10?r=US&IR=T The page says, Gateway Pundit is a "right-wing conspiracy"-site, if you look at the information on the source and then look at the page, you can also confirm that very quickly. TheImaCow (talk) 06:55, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

about the Wiggle Bay page
Please understand that i wasn't doing any disruptive edit on that page. Someone keeps messing it up by adding a personnel section incorrectly in with the tracklist section & it makes the page look awful. I'm only removing that part to page the page look better, not to be disruptive — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:5C50:5D00:4857:715E:ECAB:8C9F (talk) 15:02, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh, youre right. I removed the warnings from your Talk. TheImaCow (talk) 15:11, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * ... or you do it: D TheImaCow (talk) 15:12, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

about the Donald L. Price page
Hello, please understand that I was changing Donald's page to fix errors within the article that my fellow classmates have suggested me to change as it is for a class assignment. Thank you Kit-Kat834 (talk) 16:17, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Kit-Kat834
 * ooh, ok. I reverted my revert, now can you continue editing :) TheImaCow (talk) 16:20, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Hey
I'm just making some changes to some information that some people have forgotten about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DarkMatterMan4500 (talk • contribs) 16:49, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello
HI, Cow! Dont be stupid. --2001:268:C0A4:E4A6:9C12:9605:95B8:8EB4 (talk) 16:56, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Stupid? why? Ok, i reverted your edit, and maybe is your version the better, but it dosent looked for me like that. If you mean, your version is the better, you dont need to say "im stupid" TheImaCow (talk) 16:58, 25 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Because Pontic–Caspian steppe is not ″Russian steppes″, and Kievan Rus is not Russia. Take proper classes in geography and history before making mindless reverting. --2001:268:C0A4:E4A6:9C12:9605:95B8:8EB4 (talk) 17:05, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Kievan Rus Валко (talk) 17:43, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi TheImaCow. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have&#32;temporarily [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ATheImaCow enabled] rollback on your account&#32;until 2020-05-25. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Kevin ( aka L235 · t · c) 07:10, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

April 2020
Your revert here, and warning me about reverting clearly disruptive content is disruptive. You revert back in 3 newlines and the following piece of prose: "All of the above info is false, sleeper agents are lazy fbi and cia agents who fall asleep on the job, thus becoming a "sleeper" agent.". I expect a retraction and apology.Pikavoom (talk) 11:14, 25 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I have no idea how that happened. I probably made a mistake and thought you wrote the garbage down. Well. And of course I deleted the warning from your side. TheImaCow (talk) 13:45, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I make mistakes too, easy to get mixed up between right and left late at night. Pikavoom (talk) 05:12, 26 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Please do not call edits vandalism simply because you disagree with them, and please provide an edit summary when reverting. I'm standardizing the infoboxes across presidential elections for clarity based on the more recent convention. The edit I made to 1852 United States presidential election does not differ significantly from the version you reverted to; this is a content dispute, not vandalism. I've also responded to your message on my talk page. In the spirit of Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals, I don't consider your edit to be vandalism either, but encourage you to provide an explanation for your changes. Thanks. Tartan357 (talk) 05:53, 26 April 2020 (UTC)


 * I'm pretty sure that I just looked wrong and read "butt" instead of "buff" and didn't look at the rest. So of course you're right. Now you can of course remove the warning you received. TheImaCow (talk) 06:10, 26 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you. Tartan357 (talk) 10:00, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Moldavian Autonomous Oblast
Hello. How to remove this fantasy. Валко (talk) 18:22, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * what do you mean with "fantasy"? TheImaCow (talk) 07:29, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
 * There was a Moldovan ASSR,, after 1940 the Moldavian SSR, there was no Moldavian Autonomous Oblast. Валко (talk) 07:34, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Leave an Notic Before Making Changes
Please do not edit my userpage without leaving a message on my userpage. That way, I can know it was not vandalism. Ghost finders (talk) 05:05, 26 April 2020 (UTC)Ghost finders (talk) 05:05, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Lurk
Y u messing up wiki Ricksanchez42 (talk) 06:33, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
 * No you are messing it up TheImaCow (talk) 07:25, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
 * what is COOLCAM/UMB CAM202? TheImaCow (talk) 07:27, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Hey Dmy1948 (talk) 12:52, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Leslie Combs II
Dear Thelma: Leslie Combs II was my father's first cousin, so I am very familiar with his life and circumstances. If you want to remove what I wrote, I understand. I cannot verify what I wrote. It is family history. How can I verify that Uncle Daniel committed suicide? I guess there must be an old newspaper article from 1915. I haven't seen it. Leslie worked for my grandfather in Guatemala for a time. He worked for my grandfather, Herbert Franz Schlubach, who incidentally was married to Leslie's aunt, Annette Combs Schlubach (1880-1972). She was the daughter of Hon. Leslie Combs, US Minister to Guatemala. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KYgentleman (talk • contribs) 17:43, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
 * hmm, ok. I restored the removed content for now, but added marks. TheImaCow (talk) 17:51, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Anon IP warnings
Anonymous IPs are allowed to remove warnings from their user talk pages, just like registered users are. Stop edit-warring with him, he's simply being disruptive and angling for a block. Elizium23 (talk) 03:52, 27 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Ok, good to know, but why can the IPs do that? Isn't there a risk that they will always get 1-2 warnings and then remove them in time so that they don't get exposed? Well. I have just reported the one. TheImaCow (talk) 03:55, 27 April 2020 (UTC).
 * Yes, but it's the same risk as with a registered user. That's why best practice as a vandalism fighter is to slog through page history on their talk page to see if previous warnings have been erased.
 * Erasing your talk page is considered by us to be a signal that you've read and acknowledge receipt of the talk messages, so it's actually useful in a dispute if the user has erased messages: "well, you must have seen them because you acted to erase them here and here..." Elizium23 (talk) 04:10, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Won-il (born 1967)
Hello, with this edit you blanked a page without adequate explanation and added  to a page of which you were not the author. The article is badly formatted and notability is not easy to ascertain but this is not the way to proceed. Draftifying may be a better option. Eagleash (talk) 05:51, 27 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Sorry, i havent any Idea what happened there. May i was confused with this edit? Or i misinterpreted this edit? I dont know. TheImaCow (talk) 05:59, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * No worries; looks as if the creator blanked it (maybe in error, who knows!?) and then reinstated it. I have draftified it and suggested they sort it out before re-submitting. Cheers. Eagleash (talk) 06:02, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Blanking of Won-il (born 1967)
Hello TheImaCow,

I was just wondering why you decided to revert the edit that blanked all the content from Won-il (born 1967) (now moved to draftspace at Draft:Won-il (born 1967). The person who blanked the page was the page creator, not some random vandal; when the page creator blanks their own article that nobody else has substantially edited, this usually means that they would like it deleted, so it can be nominated for speedy deletion using.

Thank you,  Passenger pigeon  ( talk )  06:54, 27 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Oh, sorry about that, I saw you were already notified. It's good to keep in mind the use of for future occurrences like that, though.  Passenger  pigeon  ( talk )  06:56, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

The page was blanked by the creator who then reinstated it. Thelma then undid the reinstatement and added 'db-author' (G7). The creator restored it again and it is now in draftspace: See section above. Cheers. Eagleash (talk) 07:01, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Oops, I seem to be doubly-confused - the page creator actually added the content back in after I tagged it for deletion. In this case you can remove the G7 template. Sorry about all that,  Passenger pigeon  ( talk )  06:57, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi TheImaCow
About Frank Fredericks, I only fixed semantics like his name and grammar. Thus I didnt cite any source documents. ```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hilda Basson Namundjebo (talk • contribs) 09:20, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * ohhhh..youre right. I reverted my Revert, back to your version. :) TheImaCow (talk) 09:22, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Draft:List of known cases of COVID-19 in the United States
Exactly what is wrong with that edit? Category:People with the coronavirus disease 2019 was deleted at CFD! -- 65.94.170.207 (talk) 09:35, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I thought that since you replaced [current disaster] with [COVID], it would break the template. But I didn't look at the page .. so .. well. I have of course now reset my undo and removed the warning from your userpage. TheImaCow (talk) 09:42, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Ah, Ok. The new template Current COVID was discussed at WT:COVID-19 as the template for the pandemic -- 65.94.170.207 (talk) 09:43, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Going a bit fast...
RE this warning, yes the IP is being disruptive and you could've jumped right away to a level-2 or level-3 message. However, Fred Phelps is dead since 2014 so the the BLP warning was out of place.--Eostrix (talk) 09:41, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh, youre right. But a Unsourced-Warning would be ok, right? TheImaCow (talk) 09:47, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Unsourced, vandalism, disruptive, defamatory, or maybe a few others. It was a bad edit that should've been reverted, just not BLP.--Eostrix (talk) 10:03, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Explaining my action
I deleted the content on a redirect page and replaced it with new content that was relevant to the subject. I also removed the redirect. As I am relatively new to this process, I apologize if this is not the correct order of events, but I did not leave any page blank. Thank you for your help.Raisin2Love (talk) 17:07, 27 April 2020 (UTC)