User talk:TheImaCow/Archive/2021/November

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:User gurm


A tag has been placed on Category:User gurm indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:30, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

You're back!
Hello, TheImaCow,

I noticed that you had been gone for a while but it looks like you are back to active editing. Welcome back! Liz Read! Talk! 05:50, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I have some time again. Let's see how long this will last. --TheImaCow (talk) 06:34, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Whiskey Ring (1871-1875).jpg
Hello. I believe the original map was a print-free generic free-to-use open-sourced image. I can't find the original map photo. Cmguy777 (talk) 18:00, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay, this makes sense. However, this isn't the only problem with the file. The file is also an borderline case of the WP:F11 deletion criterion. What does "Charles Morrow copyright" mean, are you that person? If yes, everything is fine and i will move the file to commons. --TheImaCow (talk) 18:37, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Category:Boonie Bears fans Wikipedians has been nominated for discussion
Category:Boonie Bears fans Wikipedians has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:26, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

User:Franglespqngle
Hello, again, TheImaCow,

Thank you for catching this and tagging the page for deletion. Just a reminder, please post a notice on the talk page of the editor so they know that this kind of editing is inappropriate. If you use Twinkle and set up your Preferences to "Notify page creator" and also make sure all of the CSD boxes are checked, Twinkle should post the notification for you. Thanks again! I hope you are well. Liz Read! Talk! 20:12, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Hmm, okay. I intentionally unchecked the notification checkbox here, because of Deny recognition. I am sure that the creators of these pages know exactly that such creations are not wanted here. So i tag the nonsense to delete, and an admin comes by, deletes it and end of the story. I have noticed several times that under such "Speedy deletion nomination of XXXX" messages even more insults were made by the creators of these pages - under the message itself and on new attack pages (towards the nominator). But okay, if someone creates such a page, I will send such a message, but only on the first created vandalism page. If this message does not stop the creator, further messages will have the exact opposite effect, as the vandals will feel provoked. --TheImaCow (talk) 20:30, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Tag bombing on wikipedia.png
Hi TheImaCow, was reading Tag bombing and saw this image, the add-on/gadget above the Shortdesc helper gadget looks really cool, but I can't seem to find it anywhere, how do I get it?  Just ' i ' yaya  13:49, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * User:Justiyaya: Oh, that's the "XTools"-Gadget. You can find it under Special:Preferences > Appearance > XTools: dynamically show statistics about a page's history under the page heading. Very useful! --TheImaCow (talk) 14:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot :D  Just ' i ' yaya  14:03, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedia requested images of screencaps has been nominated for deletion
Category:Wikipedia requested images of screencaps has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — swpb T&#8201;•&#8201;go beyond&#8201;•&#8201;bad idea 20:18, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

removed unsourced material
Hello Sir, I was deleting material from the page Akashaditya Lama which had no references and citation.No sources at all to verify authenticity It was more of hyped advertisement of this person. Wikipedia needs authentic data of notable persons. I have only tried to remove such information.Please guide me if I am wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chhedafilms (talk • contribs) 18:17, 24 November 2021 (UTC) Yes, the part you removed had no supporting citations, however, removing the entire part is not appropriate. Something that has no references is usually only removed if it is something negative or controversial about the topic, or if you know for sure that it is wrong. But you removed the section only on principle "because it has no references". If you know for sure it's all wrong, then of course it can be removed, but that's not how you said it. By the way, I don't see how the content you want to remove is promotional.--TheImaCow (talk) 19:51, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you once again for your comments.There is no reliable source for the information I removed. Sorry may be I could not convey it properly.There is no authenticity to the material and seemed that it was added by a paid editor as an advertisement.Please guide further.Chhedafilms (talk) 02:49, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

"Vandalism"
This edit by an IP is a good faith (but incorrect) edit. "Gioco" is the modern Italian spelling, however in the context of modern English language chess literature the old-fashioned spelling "Giuoco" is used. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 00:00, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Your revert on "Hunter Wise Financial Group" page
You reverted my edit of the Hunter Wise Financial Group wherein I quoted from the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) announcing the conviction of Hunter Wise and two individuals. Do you even know what the Commodity Futures Trading Commission is??? It is a part of the U.S. government, established to police the commodity markets and prosecute those who violate commodity laws - in this case swindling the public through fraudulent sales of non-existent precious metals and other commodities. The public is free to quote government press releases of prosecutions. The U.S. government does not sit there and claim copyright like a private company or individual does. I think you probably don't know what the CFTC is, and have probably never even heard of it. It is here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodity_Futures_Trading_Commission

If I do not hear from you, or you do not answer this, I am going to revert your revert. I looked at your history of edits, and it appears that you do revert after revert after revert after revert of quotes and other similar things. I do not see how you can be knowledgeable of such a huge range of topics, and figure that is how you ended up reverting the quote from the CFTC press release on the conviction of Hunter Wise and two individuals. Thank you.EricSavage (talk) 21:30, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

I just looked further at the message you put on the top of the Hunter Wise page. I did NOT quote from the Futures Magazine link that you posted. I posted from the original CFTC link:

https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/6935-14

That Futures magazine page that you erroneously claimed that I quoted from, ITSELF quotes from the CFTC government prosecution press release. Please reverse the revert you made. Thank you.EricSavage (talk) 21:37, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * User:EricSavage: Yes, you are right. I didn't notice that the text was actually from the government. I will pay more attention to such things in the future and I have reverted my edits . Thanks for letting me know. --TheImaCow (talk) 06:09, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

You Reverted Native Design's Page
Could you please provide specificity as to why you flagged the Native Design page and reverted its material? None of the information that I added was promotional nor an advertisement, but factual and accurate information about the company. This will help inform exact type of factual content that can remain or be considered promotional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meat and potatoez (talk • contribs)
 * No, it is full of promotional wording. A few examples:
 * independent full-service
 * awarded for developing innovative products
 * offers a full-service innovation practice
 * that reimagined transportation choice and business models
 * In 2012 the world's third largest broadcasting corporation, BBC, worked with Native
 * worked with Native to release a range of world-firsts in digital
 * ...and many more. This definitly needs rewording. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:33, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Delete Request for Shining Glorious School
Why are you deleting request for this page rahulpaal (talk) 09:46, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Because you copied the text from another site. The text was was protected by copyright, and as such, it would be illegal for Wikipedia to use it. See WP:COPYVIO. --TheImaCow (talk) 13:46, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Rollback
Hi TheImaCow. After reviewing your request, I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ATheImaCow enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when using rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! F ASTILY  00:41, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Hedge and Donna
At Talk:Hedge and Donna, you changed living=yes to living=no, even though one of the two people in the duo is still living. I don't know if your bot needs tweaking to avoid this happening in future. Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:58, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. I'll see what i can do there. --TheImaCow (talk) 15:10, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Hans Niemann
Hi. The edit you just reverted on Hans Niemann was not a test. It's a personal attack in Spanish. (I always make a habit of translating whatever I come across on Wikipedia, to make sure it's not just something that's 'not in English'.)

However, thank you for reverting non-constructive edits! --67.183.139.157 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 18:18, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

re: Rental Management Software page
In the Example Software section of the Rental Management Software page, you rejected our edit, saying it's inappropriate for a wiki page. While I understand the concept of not wanting "Example software" to be used as an exhaustive list of businesses associated with this (or to be used as a promotional tool by companies), it seems questionable to allow other companies to use it as such, especially when said companies aren't as relevant to the rest of the wiki (there are a couple of car rental software products; the rest of the wiki is related more to the equipment and event rental industries). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.16.77.110 (talk) 17:32, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Other companies removed too. --TheImaCow (talk) 15:37, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

shilpa shirodkar namrata shirodkar
You keep the edits. no prob. Actually Namrata is elder, but joined movies later, so everyone thinks she is the younger sister. We know this since the 90s — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mousum (talk • contribs) 18:37, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who use Wikiplus has been nominated for deletion
Category:Wikipedians who use Wikiplus has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 05:41, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Category:WikiProject User warnings participant has been nominated for discussion
Category:WikiProject User warnings participant has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Invitation to discussion: FAC 4 nomination of nonmetal
Please accept this note as an invitation to participate in the discussion of this latest FAC nomination for the nonmetal article.

The context is that you were involved in the FAC 3 discussion for the article (which was not prompted) or you are an editor who made a recent edit to the nonmetal article.

Thank you. Sandbh (talk) 07:20, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Events in South Ossetia


A tag has been placed on Category:Events in South Ossetia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 06:08, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ramon Serrano Suñer (cropped).jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Ramon Serrano Suñer (cropped).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 14:49, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: B.E.H.S (5) Aungpan has been nominated for discussion
Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: B.E.H.S (5) Aungpan has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:03, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello!
Hi, TheImaCow,

I just saw your name on the page history of a draft article I was looking at and realized that I used to run into your work all of the time and it's been quite a while since I've seen you active. I hope you are well. I hope when you find the time and interest, you might return to the solid patrolling you used to do. We can use every competent editor we have these days! Take care, Liz Read! Talk! 05:40, 18 May 2022 (UTC)


 * One day, maybe. Right now, i'm not motivated at all. But thanks for the words, i appreciate it. --TheImaCow (talk) 20:52, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Removing links to "deleted pages" that were never deleted
Hi!

Sorry to be late on this, but I just noticed these edits from March of last year. I don't mind manually reverting these 43 edits (per the result of the then-already-closed AFD), but I'm a bit concerned that:
 * (i) you seem to have made hundreds if not thousands of similar edits within the same time period;
 * (ii) your edit summaries didn't link the supposedly-deleted articles, meaning each one needs to be manually checked; and
 * (iii) no one seems to have talked to you, at least on this page, about the matter in March or April 2021 (forgive me if my check was not thorough enough).

It's okay in my book as long as you're not doing it anymore, but I kinda wanted to hear from the horse's mouth that you did indeed stop because you realized the mistake.

Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 11:29, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bengali films


A tag has been placed on Category:Bengali films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 23:10, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Category:Singlechart usages for Oricon2 has been nominated for renaming
Category:Singlechart usages for Oricon2 has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 22:41, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Category:Museums in Jelgava has been nominated for merging
Category:Museums in Jelgava has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:15, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Externally peer reviewed articles by Trends in Ecology and Evolution


A tag has been placed on Category:Externally peer reviewed articles by Trends in Ecology and Evolution indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:51, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
Hello TheImaCow! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! &mdash; MusikBot II  talk  17:23, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

CfD nomination at
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at  on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkl talk  14:47, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Unassessed vital articles in Biology


A tag has been placed on Category:Unassessed vital articles in Biology indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 17:16, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:A-Class vital articles in Art


A tag has been placed on Category:A-Class vital articles in Art indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 08:13, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:SagorAhmedbd


A tag has been placed on User talk:SagorAhmedbd, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Ternera (talk) 21:29, 2 January 2024 (UTC)