User talk:TheJoshuaBoy

What are you doing? Theresa Knott | The otter sank 20:51, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

I am just starting new section on a dissuion page.--TheJoshuaBoy (talk) 20:53, 9 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I reverted you. You appear to be threatening to break the main page, but I'm not sure. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 21:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Dalmatians 3
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dalmatians 3, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Dalmatians 3. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:55, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Talk:Wikipedia has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN tell me a joke...  21:01, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Why do I need to use the sandbox.--TheJoshuaBoy (talk) 21:12, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * No one can understand your messages. There are Wikipedias in many languages; if you aren't able to communicate well in English, that's okay, and you will probably have more fun and be more useful on a Wikipedia in a language that you are fluent in. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:14, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

I have edit Meta pages


 * That's a good example, thank you. I do not understand what you are trying to tell me with your above comment at all.  -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:26, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

I have log in in Meta. I am sure that my source is hard.--TheJoshuaBoy (talk) 21:31, 9 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, as I said, I don't understand what you are saying, but it doesn't seem to relate to my suggestion that, if you are not fluent in English, you should choose a Wikipedia in a language you are fluent in. "I am sure that my source is hard" isn't a sentence that means anything in this context in English. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:33, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Can I be a Wikipedian FisherQueen. Or just eat the cat.
 * Thank you. With that message, you made it clear that you are not just a confused user who doesn't write English clearly, you are simply a disruptive vandal.  Consider this a final warning; the next time you disrupt the encyclopedia, I will block you from further editing. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:44, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

You think you are blocking me pocily. Oh. Maybe you can not blocked me. I am the adult creation. If you trying to block me. I was mean this encyclopedia was allowed. I am a Wikipedia user account.--TheJoshuaBoy (talk) 21:48, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

I have deleted all your user subpages and blocked this account from editing anywhere except this talk page. If you are playing silly buggers now is the time to stop. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 21:52, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

You forgot to add a reason for wanting the block reviewed. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 21:55, 9 March 2008 (UTC)