User talk:TheKnightoftheHeart

Muhammad
Hello - would you please follow our guidelines at MOS:ISLAM. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 14:44, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Junaid Jamshed, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. &mdash;  MusikAnimal talk 15:46, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Junaid Jamshed
Dear TheKnightoftheHeart, assalamu alaykum warahmatullahi wabatakatuh. I hope you are well. Citations to reliable, authoritative, and neutral third-party sources are essential. Wikipedia requires them. Two good sets of Wikipedia guidelines that I have found really useful can be found HERE and HERE.

This blasphemy affair is still in progress; it's unfolding as we speak. So please refrain from reaching conclusions not found in the sources or based on your own point of view. I don't actually have an interest in this guy Jamshed. He's not my ideal type of preacher. But that doesn't matter any more than your own view does. As editors we need to be objective. We also need to write in careful, proper English. I'm willing to try to help you do this if you'll let me. Pleased discuss the changes you want to make on the article's talk page. My regards, George Custer&#39;s Sabre (talk) 12:32, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Junaid Jamshed: Allegation of Blasphemy
I repeat what I said above: it cannot be stated or implied at this stage that Jamshed HAS committed blasphemy. It is currently just an ALLEGATION. Thus, the section can't be titled "Blasphemy". Please don't start an edit war on this issue. George Custer&#39;s Sabre (talk) 15:33, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Luke no 94 (tell Luke off here) 12:06, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did at Junaid Jamshed. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Wifione  Message 18:22, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

As to what specific rule I violated, can you please make mention of that?TheKnightoftheHeart (talk) 04:03, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Repeatedly reinstating contentious and challenged material into a BLP against consensus.  Wifione  Message 10:31, 17 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Dear TheKnightoftheHeart, salam. I wish to make a correction: I do not know Luke no 94 . He is not my "friend" and I have no contact with him outside of Wikipedia. He is anonymous to me. I merely see him as an excellent, professional and ethical editor with a fine record on Wikipedia. George Custer&#39;s Sabre (talk) 05:24, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Gorge is correct. Also, as a rule of thumb, if you're blocked for making BLP-violating statements, it is a really bad idea to keep making the same statements in your unblock request; you should also read WP:NOTTHEM. Luke no 94  (tell Luke off here) 10:53, 17 December 2014 (UTC)