User talk:TheLevite1347

Your edits to Chronology of the Bible
I hope you'll take some time to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policies such as WP:SOAP and WP:OR and WP:3RR. Also, if you find your edits being reverted by more experienced editors, consider discussing the edit on the talk page and finding a consensus, rather than simply trying again to make the same edit. - Lisa (talk - contribs) 21:34, 18 April 2013 (UTC)


 * I have no idea what you're talking about. You keep talking about BC/BCE, when that has absolutely nothing to do with your edit.  Of course it should be BCE and not BC.  But that's because of the content of the article.  Your objections to BC may be legitimate.  I don't like it or use it myself, particularly since I'm Jewish.  But Wikipedia has a policy on the issue.  Look at WP:BCE.


 * But that's completely irrelevant here. This is the edit you keep making:


 * ''For a complete compilation of the Tenach “old testament” and Brit Chadasha “new testament” chronologies from Adam to present, see "Time Line 1, The 6000 Years from Adam to Yeshua's Return"


 * Nothing in this edit relates at all to the usage of BC or BCE. Your reference to "Brit Chadasha" and "Yeshua" seem to identify you either as a so-called "Messianic Jew", or a Christian fan of them, which doesn't endear you to me in the least.


 * I assume that you are "Hezekiya Haas". You can't keep inserting ads for a timeline you wrote.  I don't care how well researched you think it is.  You also seem to have ignored what's posted at the beginning of the article:


 * This article deals with the chronology of the Hebrew Bible (or Christian Old Testament). For material on the Christian New Testament, see Chronology of Jesus, Historical reliability of the Acts of the Apostles, and Timeline of Christianity. For a historical look at the bible see The Bible and history. For the composition of the various books of the Bible, see Dating the Bible.


 * Do you understand that? Is there something about it that is confusing you?  You can't keep inserting this edit into that article.  It will be removed every time you do.  Since you continue to insert it despite being told to take your case to the talk page and despite being pointed to Wikipedia policies that disallow the edit, I decided that your action constituted vandalism.  That's what it's called when someone deliberately inserts inappropriate text into an article.  If you don't like that, you can go to the talk page for the article and discuss it there.  Maybe someone else can explain this to you in a way you'll understand.


 * Lastly, I looked at the Haas chronology you posted. It's not bad for a parody.  - Lisa (talk - contribs) 04:07, 25 April 2013 (UTC)


 * PS: when you leave a note on someone's talk page, you don't simply add it to a previous note by someone else. You create a new section.  If you do want to continue commenting after a previous comment, you indent your comment so that it's noticably different than the preceding one.  To indent, use a colon.  Or two.  Depending on how much you want to indent.  If you notice, my first comment here was not indented.  My second one was indented a single time (but again on each paragraph in the comment, and this PS is indented twice.  - Lisa (talk - contribs) 04:07, 25 April 2013 (UTC)