User talk:TheMadEntity

June 2015
Hello, I'm Optakeover. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to History of the Catholic Church— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Optakeover (Talk)  13:43, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, TheMadEntity, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

I was about to revert the same edit. Wikipedia articles must adhere to neutral point of view and should reflect the consensus of reliable sources. The article History of the Catholic Church does need a great deal of work, but your edits skewed the article to an opposite opinion. That doesn't work well. I encourage you to read through the links above and get a better understanding of how articles ought to be written, and then start a discussion on the article talk page about changes you'd like to make. Karanacs (talk) 13:47, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User_talk:optakeover with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Optakeover (Talk)  13:48, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at History of the Catholic Church, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: History of the Catholic Church was changed by TheMadEntity (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.927961 on 2015-06-15T13:49:02+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:49, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Help me!
The Roman Catholic Church is not truly Christian, so for honesty's sake, should be referred to as CLAIMING to be. If not, you will be SERIUOSLY be misleading your readers, and ruining your cedibility.

Please help me with... editing this article to at LEAST make it obvious it is a CLAIM.

theMadEntity TheMadEntity (talk) 14:02, 15 June 2015 (UTC)


 * This is a non-starter. Reliable sources accept that the Roman Catholic Church is a denomination of Christianity.  We don't offer our opinions on whether or not that is true. Karanacs (talk) 14:13, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
 * As Karanacs said, we go by what reliable sources say. Reliable sources say that Catholicism is a form of Christianity; Wikipedia therefore says the same. Yunshui 雲 水 14:23, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Well, one of your "Reliable sources" is not the Bible- and it should be your most important. But, I've little time to play games; I hope you take an HONEST look at this matter someday- for the RCC is the most foul and deceptive religion that ever existed. The basis of their Church should be the Bible; but it isn't in any REAL way.

Cheers!
 * As already mentioned, please read WP:NEUTRAL. Thank you. Optakeover  (Talk)  15:57, 15 June 2015 (UTC)